Would have to beI hope so. 6-1 and just beat #1 and our only loss isn't too bad.
Good observation. My only worry is that we tend to play down to the level of our competition. I mean look at us against Purdue, all those missed free throws!Not only will NU be ranked (though yes, below Purdue), but with no games until December 10, it's possible they'll be ranked next week too. Of course they have to win that Dec. 10 game, and I assume nothing, but I will go out on a limb and say that 0-7 Detroit Mercy will not give NU as tough as a game as they got last night.
Yeah, I'd be surprised if we were ranked as well. Maybe in the top 35 point-getters.I'd feel more confident NU would be ranked if they had *any* points in the poll last week, but I still think this one win will catapult them into the rankings. Early-season rankings generally aren't going to care about games like Western Michigan (as long as you get the win), but wins over ranked teams are huge, especially #1.
I know the bracketology stuff is even more meaningless right now, but to the point that Lunardi and his ilk are doing them now anyway, I'd like to see NU get off the "last four in" line and more safely into the tournament - and of course to stay there too.
Yes we will most definitely crack the top25I hope so. 6-1 and just beat #1 and our only loss isn't too bad.
Purdue and some other overrated teamWisconsin should be ra ked, they just beat Marquette. Just joking.
But if NU and Wisco sin go in, who comes out.
Marquette is back to being a great program.. Very good win by Wisconsin.Wisconsin should be ra ked, they just beat Marquette. Just joking.
But if NU and Wisco sin go in, who comes out.
That's was a good win for Wisconsin and the Big10. Hopefully Purude wins out the rest of the month and that would look great for NU. Dayton had a good win against SMU which helpsMarquette is back to being a great program.. Very good win by Wisconsin.
I agree. Don’t care about that at all. Keep a chip on their shoulders. All that matters is where you are seeded.I'm ok being unranked. It's still way early in the season. Lets see the Cats win the next five gimmes, beat IU, and then revisit being ranked. Right now it just feels premature in terms of our achievements so far.
Or you can note that Purdue this year had just beaten Marquette, Tennessee and Gonzaga (as opposed to beating lots of Big Ten teams last year leading up to February). Hard to argue which one is more impressive. And to me, with Purdue focused on seeking revenge, and with our losing more key guys than them since last year, this year is more impressive.For as awesome as last night’s victory was, and one can argue it was against a better #1 team than last year’s, it’s not as impressive to beat a #1 this early in the season as it is late.
This is because a late #1 is a true #1, tried and tested. Right now it can be a team that later falls apart.
I think we beat a better team than last year. Just offering an explanation as to why there’s not as much buzz about it outside the purple bubble as there was last year.Or you can note that Purdue this year had just beaten Marquette, Tennessee and Gonzaga (as opposed to beating lots of Big Ten teams last year leading up to February). Hard to argue which one is more impressive. And to me, with Purdue focused on seeking revenge, and with our losing more key guys than them since last year, this year is more impressive.
Ok. Not sure how we define “buzz”, but we did get on the ESPN Top Headlines like last year.I think we beat a better team than last year. Just offering an explanation as to why there’s not as much buzz about it outside the purple bubble as there was last year.
Yeah, but the headline read, "Late flurry lifts N'western past No. 1 Purdue again.". Late flurry? NU tied the game with 15 minutes left and had the lead in the last few minutes. The headline makes it seem like Purdue blew a big lead at the end or NU had a lucky run.Ok. Not sure how we define “buzz”, but we did get on the ESPN Top Headlines like last year.
Ok - that’s not quite the way it hit me - it was a battle that we won late (in OT).Yeah, but the headline read, "Late flurry lifts N'western past No. 1 Purdue again.". Late flurry? NU tied the game with 15 minutes left and had the lead in the last few minutes. The headline makes it seem like Purdue blew a big lead at the end or NU had a lucky run.
I am fine if NU beating the number one team is now seen as routine.Yeah, but the headline read, "Late flurry lifts N'western past No. 1 Purdue again.". Late flurry? NU tied the game with 15 minutes left and had the lead in the last few minutes. The headline makes it seem like Purdue blew a big lead at the end or NU had a lucky run.
It seems to me that people take the College Basketball Rankings far less seriously than the football one's.
For example
Ranked at 34 it's the Wildcats
Ranked at 27 is West Virginia....their record is 3 and 4.
Ranked at 11 is Saint Marys and their record is even worse 3 and 5
I have to wonder if this isn't something people just do on the fly (and might have filled out before our game). If we are not in the Top 25 next week I am simply going to stop looking at them. If it's a coaches poll a lot of the coaches might be assistants or even grad students told to "fill this out for me, willya? thanks".
College Basketball Rankings 2024-25 - NET
Get the latest College Basketball rankings for the 2024-25 season. Find out where your favorite team is ranked in the AP Top 25, Coaches Poll, Top 25 And 1, NET, or RPI polls and rankings.www.cbssports.com
I'm ok being unranked. It's still way early in the season. Lets see the Cats win the next five gimmes, beat IU, and then revisit being ranked. Right now it just feels premature in terms of our achievements so far.
Nobody said it was insignificant. I don't think the one big win is enough to jump us into the top 25 (i.e. being "ranked"). I apologize if I was so unclear as to lead you to such a significant misinterpretation of my post.Premature? We just beat the #1 team in the nation. That’s a significant accomplishment. Sheesh.
And because it was more expected. Vegas only gave Cats 5.5I think we beat a better team than last year. Just offering an explanation as to why there’s not as much buzz about it outside the purple bubble as there was last year.
It's December 3. How many wins over the number one team in the nation do we need to have so far for you to say we belong in the top 25?Nobody said it was insignificant. I don't think the one big win is enough to jump us into the top 25 (i.e. being "ranked"). I apologize if I was so unclear as to lead you to such a significant misinterpretation of my post.
I think Wisconsin won their November tournament too though. They have a couple nice wins now I think.Evidently Wisconsin's win over #3 Marquette was more impressive to the voters than our win over #1 somehow...
Win out in December and NU will be ranked when they roll into Champaign on Jan 2.
It may not be all about brand names, but they seem to have an outsized impact.I can understand Wisconsin being ranked they had previously beaten a 7-1 Virginia teams also currently ranked but what I don’t understand is why the hell a team like Tennessee is in there with a 4-3 record and Duke ranked 23rd with a 5-3 record this doesn’t make any sense it’s all about brand-name for these rankings i guess .