Originally posted by No Chores:
shakes,
Nice to hear from you, but I disagree. Cardale Jones will be the starting qb at OSU next year. Barrett lost to VA. Tech and was taken to double OT by Penn State, a team that was crushed by the 'Cats. Jones destroyed Wisconsin, Alabama, and Oregon. He is enormous, not very susceptible to injury and has a huge arm. He will be a first round draft choice after 2015.
Talk about revisionist history and going after the "new hot thing."
Cardale Jones:
Oregon: 16-23 242 1 TD 1 INT 21 rushes for 38 yards 1 TD
Alabama: 18-35 243 1 TD 1 INT 17 rushes 43 yards
Wisconsin: 12-17 257 3 TDs 8 rushes 9 yards
Ezekiel Elliot on the other hand:
Oregon: 36 for 246 and 4 TDs
Alabama: 20 for 230 and 2 TDs
Wisconsin: 20 for 220 2 TDs
Last 3 games 232 ypg 2.67 TDs per game
Compare that to Elliots production against Va Tech and Penn State
Va Tech: 8 for 32 and 1 TD
Penn State: 26 for 109 1 TD
First 12 games games: 98 ypg .83 TD per game
No offense to Jones who played really good games, JT Barrett was right there with Gordon and Cooper in the Heisman running. Jones's success in the final three games had a lot to do with the success of the running back and the offensive line manhandling the defenses and less to do with Jones's ability.
Look at passer ratings Barrett 169.8 vs Jones 160.2. That's the difference between the #2 QB (after Mariota's that was off the charts) and #7. It's small, but it's there. The metric I like is QBR (I linked in article explaining the metric) which takes into consideration who is responsible for the play rather than just the numbers. JT Barrett 81.9 Cardale Jones 60.6. JT Barrett was #2 in the country. Jones would be 56th if he played enough to qualify.
Now I know what you're going to say. Jones played 3 great teams which is why they have adjusted QBR to take into account the opponents skill. JT Barrett #3 in the country at 85.6. Jones #27 at 71.9.
Bottom line Barrett out played Jones by every statistical measure I can find.
QBR explanation