I actually disagree. What NC did was a despicable academic joke, but the sham classes were open to all students (even as athletes were steered to them). Accordingly, the sham classes were not a "special benefit" for athletes, unfortunately removing it from the NCAA's purview.
That said, what SHOULD happen is that NC's accrediting agency should go after them with a huge, well-sharpened axe. It turned out to be academic fraud. Academic fraud from which athletes "benefited" along with other students. That kind of fraud is well within the purview of their accreditation agency, SAC (Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges).
There were a number of jocks in Intro to Astronomy when I took it with J. Allen......mick course if every there was one!Problem is, you can't write by-laws on the fly to suit the situation. Despite a lengthy investigation, they couldn't find sufficient evidence of violations of NCAA bylaws. It would be an impossible task for the NCAA to assume for itself the evaluation of the academic merit of every class every athlete (and others) take. Do you think they can fairly make those determinations? I don't.
Other organizations, on the other hand, have that precise responsibility, and the expertise to do it.
Problem is, you can't write by-laws on the fly to suit the situation. Despite a lengthy investigation, they couldn't find sufficient evidence of violations of NCAA bylaws. It would be an impossible task for the NCAA to assume for itself the evaluation of the academic merit of every class every athlete (and others) take. Do you think they can fairly make those determinations? I don't.
Other organizations, on the other hand, have that precise responsibility, and the expertise to do it.
Is the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges a real organization or simply a sham set up to rubber stamp Southern schools in the face of poor educational standards in the south?I actually disagree. What NC did was a despicable academic joke, but the sham classes were open to all students (even as athletes were steered to them). Accordingly, the sham classes were not a "special benefit" for athletes, unfortunately removing it from the NCAA's purview.
That said, what SHOULD happen is that NC's accrediting agency should go after them with a huge, well-sharpened axe. It turned out to be academic fraud. Academic fraud from which athletes "benefited" along with other students. That kind of fraud is well within the purview of their accreditation agency, SAC (Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges).
Hmm. When I took Genetics at NU, it was a lecture / lab course taught by R. C. King who wrote the text book. We chloroformed and counted fruit flies. And allowed a few swarms to escape. Maybe that's why they discontinued the lab part.
It's a legit, recognized regional accreditation agency, one of the six regional accrediting agencies (the regional counterpart to the North Central Association --> Higher Learning Commission in the Midwest/West). They have plenty of teeth available for use.Is the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges a real organization or simply a sham set up to rubber stamp Southern schools in the face of poor educational standards in the south?