Fun with hypotheticals
- Thread starter TheC
- Start date
Tough tough choice. Clarify "choking away". 20 point loss, never in the game?
I guess winning a first round game might be better, especially if the 2nd round isn't an ass beating
Edit. Win an NCAA game. Remember the "haven't won a bowl since the 40s" mantra? Let's end the "haven't won a tourney game" before it starts
I guess winning a first round game might be better, especially if the 2nd round isn't an ass beating
Edit. Win an NCAA game. Remember the "haven't won a bowl since the 40s" mantra? Let's end the "haven't won a tourney game" before it starts
Last edited:
The question is posed as a trade-off for a reason 
I don't think either is inherently better for the program. People remember 15 seeds winning, not 9 seeds. However I would guess that in the next ten years NU will have more games won in the NCAAs than conference tournament championships. So I'll pick the more rare event and say Big Ten title.
I don't think either is inherently better for the program. People remember 15 seeds winning, not 9 seeds. However I would guess that in the next ten years NU will have more games won in the NCAAs than conference tournament championships. So I'll pick the more rare event and say Big Ten title.
I guess I mean losing, period. I assumed that if we won the BTT, we'd get a 7 or higher seed, so losing in the first round would be viewed as an upset.
I think that winning the BTT would be a great step for the program, and I'd prefer a BTT win to a two-game NCAA run. A BTT win makes NU one of ... three conference champions on one of the biggest days of the season. A Thursday or Friday win makes NU one of 16 winners.
Exceptions: I would prefer a day one win if accompanied by, say, a 40 point outburst from Lindsey (think Harold 'The Show' Arceneaux, who will forever be grilling [Weber State!] the Tar Heels in our minds) or a memorable buzzer beater.
Exceptions: I would prefer a day one win if accompanied by, say, a 40 point outburst from Lindsey (think Harold 'The Show' Arceneaux, who will forever be grilling [Weber State!] the Tar Heels in our minds) or a memorable buzzer beater.
I voted NCAA wins. I just don't like these conference tournaments. The regular season games are what should count.The question is posed as a trade-off for a reason
I don't think either is inherently better for the program. People remember 15 seeds winning, not 9 seeds. However I would guess that in the next ten years NU will have more games won in the NCAAs than conference tournament championships. So I'll pick the more rare event and say Big Ten title.
I'm with you willy. Watching these games in empty gyms is boring. And playing 3 or 4 consecutive days just becomes an endurance contest. But as long as the TV money is there, so will post-season championships.
Similar threads
