Precisely. Watching the few highlight videos we have, he is going to be special for NU.I don't think people realize how good Lathon is. I certainly don't have any inside knowledge but I believe we will be very happy with him from day one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Precisely. Watching the few highlight videos we have, he is going to be special for NU.I don't think people realize how good Lathon is. I certainly don't have any inside knowledge but I believe we will be very happy with him from day one.
As much depth as this past season!I overlooked Gaines. Thanks for catching it. It would be the greatest quality depth I've seen at NU.
starting 5 with mooney
mooney
taylor
law
nance/turner/gaines
pardon
starting 5 with mooney
mooney
taylor
law
nance/turner/gaines
pardon
"Had Sobo" in the same way we "have Ash" now. Dave really struggled in Collins first year during non conference play, got banged up and never regained a starting role.
With BMac on board the following year, it was a given Sobo would see action in a reserve role, a role he filled nicely. That's where Ash will fit in going forward with Lathon in the mix.
It's a different calculation if Mooney were to sign. Collins would then have several legitimate starting options between the LG and two wings depending on match ups, style of play, and speed at which to bring Lathon (and Kopp) along.
Ah yes absolutely I forgot him, put Kopp in the group w Turner Gaines // Nance Falzon. It’s possible that 8 guys play 20+ mpg next year. That said, based on past experience, it might be more likely that due to injuries, or some players asserting themselves more than others, that we settle on a core rotation of ~7.agree with everything you wrote.....but with the add that Kopp will get significant minutes from the start
Just like the last 4 years, no one.Ok. Who keeps up with the opposing PG?
You watched him play, right? The answer to you question is just that.Thought we had SOBO. Why was that not an option then?
Ok. Who keeps up with the opposing PG? What happens in the press? Do we have more turnovers or assists as a team by the start of conference?
I like all the players above, a lot, but real world is not a video game. You couldn’t put 5 MJs on the floor. No rebounding, no real ball handling, too much ball needing, etc. There are pivotal roles and ball handler / distributer as well as guy to check opposing ball handler / distributer is one.
I can see a combo of ‘the wings’ spelling the LG role for 5 minutes a game. But longer than that without a distributor, a guy to get the ball moving...I would expect a lot of one on five and chucks from the outside, when not turned over.
I would take 5 MJ’s and take my chances.
Not me, he kinda old and hasn't played for a while. But then again, I imagine the guys at your Y are pretty old too...
I recall Ted Williams being asked at the time he was a manager if he thought he could hit .300 against the current crop of big league pitchers. Williams responded that "of course I could. But you have to remember, I am 66 years old!"Not me, he kinda old and hasn't played for a while. But then again, I imagine the guys at your Y are pretty old too...
I recall Ted Williams being asked at the time he was a manager if he thought he could hit .300 against the current crop of big league pitchers. Williams responded that "of course I could. But you have to remember, I am 66 years old!"
I wouldn't bet much against Michael Jeffrey Jordan...
Wasn't this whole experiment explored thanks to the Washington Wizards. In fact, rumor has it Hamilton got traded because he kicked some Jordan arse for $$$ playing one-on-one before practice one day. And Hamilton would never be my first pick in any kind of fantasy draft. And that was, like, ten years ago. I suppose if we are talking about games at the Y, I would 5 MJs all day, any day. Against a Michigan, MSU or other high level D1 team, well, not so sure. Against any NBA squad, I don't think so - not a set of current MJs. But offer a set of MJs in his prime and I would probably wager on them...
The original point, though, was related to the importance of roles in team basketball. And the PG (or LG) cannot be overlooked on offense or defense. While you might be able to get by with someone else at the position against the other team's reserve, I believe that much more often than not, you will be burned trying to play a non-PG against a D1, P5, B1G PG. I think Lathon can probably handle the role from Day 1 - but I am concerned about expecting him to handle it for about 35 mpg for the full course of a season. We caught lightening in a bottle with an older, mature BMac and even he wore down quite noticeably by mid-B1G season.
I am not sure where I stand. Mooney is a valuable player but not a LG, at least not beyond covering the other team's reserve. Assuming a healthy Law, part of me would rather see a PGish player better than Ash. That's the bar, better than Ash. But I can understand the notion that Mooney increases talent level and might be able to cover LG for spurts.
In that case, pray for Lathon to receive the protection of the Gods against injury and maybe ask for their stamina too, cuz if anything happens to Lathon (including a mid-B1G freshman meltdown) and the season is over, Mooney and Taylor be damned.
There are four scenarios that could play out with regards to Mooney. I'd argue each outcome is strictly better having Mooney than not.
1) Get Mooney. He is a better LG option than Lathon, and so he starts.
2) Get Mooney. Lathon outplays him, or your concerns appear and Lathon starts instead.
3) Don't get Mooney, get a lesser LG prospect. That player is better than Lathon, and so he starts.
4) Don't get Mooney, get a lesser LG prospect. Lathon outplays him.
If you assume that there is no better LG available to NU than Mooney (which I do), then outcome 1 is by definition better than 3, and 2 better than 4.
Get Mooney.
There are four scenarios that could play out with regards to Mooney. I'd argue each outcome is strictly better having Mooney than not.
1) Get Mooney. He is a better LG option than Lathon, and so he starts.
2) Get Mooney. Lathon outplays him, or your concerns appear and Lathon starts instead.
3) Don't get Mooney, get a lesser LG prospect. That player is better than Lathon, and so he starts.
4) Don't get Mooney, get a lesser LG prospect. Lathon outplays him.
If you assume that there is no better LG available to NU than Mooney (which I do), then outcome 1 is by definition better than 3, and 2 better than 4.
Get Mooney.
More Mooney! More Mooney! Cash back rewards!wrassler has got a new favorite on here.starting 5 with mooney
mooney
taylor
law
nance/turner/gaines
pardon