phatcat Well-Known Member Nov 5, 2001 17,382 10,530 113 Wisconsin Dec 2, 2017 #1 Or is it "malignment"? Is it as simple as the movement of talent to the defense like we did WR =>DB? I mean, Lanny might make a slight difference on the OL
Or is it "malignment"? Is it as simple as the movement of talent to the defense like we did WR =>DB? I mean, Lanny might make a slight difference on the OL
F freewillie07 Well-Known Member Gold Member Aug 22, 2017 4,955 5,351 113 Dec 2, 2017 #2 phatcat said: Or is it "malignment"? Is it as simple as the movement of talent to the defense like we did WR =>DB? I mean, Lanny might make a slight difference on the OL Click to expand... There are not many other examples of a shift, is the thing. Yes, Lancaster would have been excellent on the OL. In fact, the only other example is Oxley moving in the opposite direction -- from DL to OL.
phatcat said: Or is it "malignment"? Is it as simple as the movement of talent to the defense like we did WR =>DB? I mean, Lanny might make a slight difference on the OL Click to expand... There are not many other examples of a shift, is the thing. Yes, Lancaster would have been excellent on the OL. In fact, the only other example is Oxley moving in the opposite direction -- from DL to OL.
G gocatsgo2003 Well-Known Member Gold Member Mar 30, 2006 42,187 26,489 113 Dec 2, 2017 #3 freewillie07 said: There are not many other examples of a shift, is the thing. Yes, Lancaster would have been excellent on the OL. In fact, the only other example is Oxley moving in the opposite direction -- from DL to OL. Click to expand... ... then back to DL.
freewillie07 said: There are not many other examples of a shift, is the thing. Yes, Lancaster would have been excellent on the OL. In fact, the only other example is Oxley moving in the opposite direction -- from DL to OL. Click to expand... ... then back to DL.
