Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is Stanford so far ahead of us 11 vs 20? Same record and obviously we have the head to head and both of our losses are to top 12 teams. Also don't get how Michigan moved up and is now ahead of Utah
Stanford has the 28th ranked strength of schedule. We have the 43rd. We're 7-2 against the FBS. They're 8-2. We're 6-2 against the powers five. They're 7-2. We've been blown out or won close games (except for 2). They've lost close games (10 points and 2 points) and have won 6 games by at least 3 scores.Why is Stanford so far ahead of us 11 vs 20? Same record and obviously we have the head to head and both of our losses are to top 12 teams. Also don't get how Michigan moved up and is now ahead of Utah
Just keep winning and ratings will take care of themselves.Dropped 2 spots in the only poll that matters after a lackluster PU game. Seems about right.
Because Stanford has only lost one more game and it was close. We have lost two and they were not close. Because Utah has lost twice recently while Mich has lost once in a controversial fashion.Why is Stanford so far ahead of us 11 vs 20? Same record and obviously we have the head to head and both of our losses are to top 12 teams. Also don't get how Michigan moved up and is now ahead of Utah
Because Utah has lost twice recently while Mich has lost once in a controversial fashion.
It's the eye test. Stanford have been much more impressive in their wins than has nu, and also better in their losses. Unlike NU, Stanford actually has a competent offense.
I really do not understand the emphasis on scores. One either wins the game or loses the game. Nothing else matters.Because Stanford has only lost one more game and it was close. We have lost two and they were not close. Because Utah has lost twice recently while Mich has lost once in a controversial fashion.
When you're trying to separate a dozen teams with 2 losses and 6 of those teams have similar strength of schedule, some subjectivity has to come into play as the committ is (supposed to be) watching the games. Watching the Iowa and Michigan games doesn't really give any points subjectively. Additionally, it shows the committee that if NU were in the playoff, they could be risking a terrible blowout game that no one wants to watch. Watching Michigan MSU, one could say that Michigan "hung in there" with a top 10 team and really had the game in there hands. As such, that tells the committee that if Michigan were in the playoff, they would put up a fight.I really do not understand the emphasis on scores. One either wins the game or loses the game. Nothing else matters.