Penn State's case concerned events from years earlier perpetuated by one high-level individual. The questions became, "What did Paterno know, and when did he know? Or what should he have known?"
But at NU, the allegations involve the entire team, especially after their letter in defense of Fitz. How is the program supposed to proceed from here? With the firing of Fitz, they're all presumed sexual abusers—past and present, unless they were whistleblowers. And if they didn't perpetuate the sexual abuse, then they watched it. They were complicit. Not to mention, apparently they also suffered it.
It's not like media, or commentators, or fans can just blame Fitz. In fact, he seems to be just about the only person that players and the report agree DIDN'T know about the hazing. He took the fall by losing his job. But the players will take all the blame from here. And the stigma will attach to all NU players of the last 25 years as well, no matter where they go.
The failure of the report, and then the response by Schill, was not disclosing the scope. Was this so widespread as to deserve firing for the coach even though few have claimed that he knew anything? Or was it localized to some players and not others, a kind of dirty secret that many players resented and resisted to no avail over the years?
Leaving these questions without answers puts all these players in a bind.
But at NU, the allegations involve the entire team, especially after their letter in defense of Fitz. How is the program supposed to proceed from here? With the firing of Fitz, they're all presumed sexual abusers—past and present, unless they were whistleblowers. And if they didn't perpetuate the sexual abuse, then they watched it. They were complicit. Not to mention, apparently they also suffered it.
It's not like media, or commentators, or fans can just blame Fitz. In fact, he seems to be just about the only person that players and the report agree DIDN'T know about the hazing. He took the fall by losing his job. But the players will take all the blame from here. And the stigma will attach to all NU players of the last 25 years as well, no matter where they go.
The failure of the report, and then the response by Schill, was not disclosing the scope. Was this so widespread as to deserve firing for the coach even though few have claimed that he knew anything? Or was it localized to some players and not others, a kind of dirty secret that many players resented and resisted to no avail over the years?
Leaving these questions without answers puts all these players in a bind.