I think what jjjjjjjj (is that too many??) is saying is that the "scouting report" is a bit lacking. If I were to send a request for a professional scouting request for a PG, I might frame it with questions such as:
- how would you rate his ball handling skills at this point? who is a good comparable?
- how does he distribute the ball? is he a drive and kick player, pick and roll, etc? with respect to passing and assists, how would you rate him and who is a good comparable?
- on ability to drive the ball, is he equally adept at going to his right and left? how does he finish? can he finish with both right and left hands? does he play above the rim on finishes? who is a good comparable?
- initiation of the break - does he show ability to push the ball up the court quickly and initiate the fast break? who is a good comparable?
- how is he on defense? does he show good on-the-ball defensive ability? how does he communicate and rotate on defense? does he generate a high or low % of steals? who is a good comparable?
- how does he demonstrate leadership qualities? does he bring his teammates up, or put them on his back when needed?
- how is his level of athleticism? rate his quickness, speed with the ball, leaping ability, etc. Again, who is a good comparable?
Answering these questions would provide a thorough scouting report. Saying that he is "long and athletic" and "will develop at the next level", the former can be seen by his photos and measurables, the latter should be assumed for any D1 recruit.
All that said, I'm very excited about the commitment, glad he is going to be a Wildcat, and fully trust CC and staff's judgement on talent. They've had a very high hit rate so far. But, this is a "professional" scouting, recruiting, and news outlet, so I don't think the reporting quality expectations are entirely unreasonable. I hope you take this as constructive criticism as it is intended. I am and will remain a faithful reader and participant.