I love Trevor but Keenum’s on a different level. He’s played in 78 games, thrown for 78 TDs, and passed for almost 15K yards. He was also a record setting college QB. The Browns should have finished last season with him instead of Baker.
Trevor is 4 years younger, has played in 33 games, thrown for 7K yards and 41 TDs. Not quite the same level. But their passer ratings are close and he has a few years to catch up.
I agree that Daniel is below average, and Glennon stinks.
Cousins is getting paid $30M guaranteed a season for a reason.
What the 2 did in college is irrelevant - played with and against different levels of talent.
Here, however, is a comparison of them QBing the Broncos 2 yrs apart.
Siemian - 14 gms, 59.5%, 3,401 yds, 7.0 yds/avg, 18 TDs, 10 INTs, 31 sacks, 84.6 rating
Keenum - 16 gms, 62.3%, 3,890 yds, 6.6 yds/avg, 18 TDs, 15 INTs, 34 sacks, 81.2 rating
In most categories, Siemian was better despite it being his
1st season of playing compared to it being Keenum
6th year of seeing action.
Also, Trevor played most of that season with a serious shoulder injury (actually played less than 14 gms as he was knocked out early in 2).
Keenum also had a lot more help from the run game - the Broncos avg'ing
4.9 ypc with their lead back, Lindsay avg'ing 5.4 ypc. They also had 12 big run plays.
In Siemian's 1st season as a starter, the Broncos avg'd a pitiful
3.6 ypc with only 4 big run plays, 2 of them coming in the 1st game of the season.
Know that Siemian is a little bit younger; that's why I included his 2 yr contract with the Bears despite not yet suiting up for them and he's still nowhere close to Keenum's earnings.
Given a similar opportunity, think Trevor could do what Cousins is doing now (but making fewer bone-headed throws).
In his 1st 3 yrs of being a part-time QB for Wash, Cousins had 18 TDs vs 19 INTs.
Cousins finally started to put things together in his 4th season (this is where continuity with not only the team, but the system helps the QB, something Siemian never had).