ADVERTISEMENT

Thorson injured?

mybrotha

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2011
2,162
107
63
According to VegasInsider.com Thorson is out for the Stanford game! I sure as heck hope that this is a mistake!!
 
Only thing I can think of GCG is that because he was named the starter, that's what they were trying to say. I think we would have heard if he got hurt.
 
Only thing I can think of GCG is that because he was named the starter, that's what they were trying to say. I think we would have heard if he got hurt.
Less than 24 hours ago, Fitz stood in front of the fans and was excited about Thorson. Even said the other QB's would have roles. Thorson even did a podcast with insidenu. So I'm not sure if you read the report right or what is going on in vegas??? I went to vegasinsider.com and I didn't see that report. The only thing I saw was them talking about the 45 point total being the second lowest.
 
Less than 24 hours ago, Fitz stood in front of the fans and was excited about Thorson. Even said the other QB's would have roles. Thorson even did a podcast with insidenu. So I'm not sure if you read the report right or what is going on in vegas??? I went to vegasinsider.com and I didn't see that report. The only thing I saw was them talking about the 45 point total being the second lowest.

Wanna change your prediction again?
 
Less than 24 hours ago, Fitz stood in front of the fans and was excited about Thorson. Even said the other QB's would have roles. Thorson even did a podcast with insidenu. So I'm not sure if you read the report right or what is going on in vegas??? I went to vegasinsider.com and I didn't see that report. The only thing I saw was them talking about the 45 point total being the second lowest.
I looked and could not find anything there either.
 
I looked and could not find anything there either.
Guys you have to go to the Stanford-NU game spread for Vegas Odds. On the game they list the various Casinos and their numbers. Under that horizontal set of numbers it states big players who are out for the teams playing. It states "NOW-Clayton Thorson- OUT"
 
Here's a cut and paste of that section. I deleted a bunch of the numbers but you see here at the bottom the item about Thorson...171 Stanford
172 Northwestern
-10 -10
45u-10

-12 -10

Time-change to 12:00pm EDT | NOW-QB-Clayton Thorson-OUT | TV: ESPN, DTV: 206

I am still guessing that's it's simply a mistake, but this is a big site that a ton of people go to.
 
Guys you have to go to the Stanford-NU game spread for Vegas Odds. On the game they list the various Casinos and their numbers. Under that horizontal set of numbers it states big players who are out for the teams playing. It states "NOW-Clayton Thorson- OUT"
Thanks. I found it, but I don't believe it.
 
Here's a cut and paste of that section. I deleted a bunch of the numbers but you see here at the bottom the item about Thorson...171 Stanford
172 Northwestern
-10 -10
45u-10

-12 -10

Time-change to 12:00pm EDT | NOW-QB-Clayton Thorson-OUT | TV: ESPN, DTV: 206

I am still guessing that's it's simply a mistake, but this is a big site that a ton of people go to.

One would think that given the fact that $'s are involved these guys would have good sources.........
 
Wanna change your prediction again?
Yes, I would change my prediction if there was a significant injury like this. But it would be a complete insult if we found out about such a big injury through Vegas as opposed to those in the program we support. I think Vegas is wrong. At any rate, the line didn't move so it may be a misprint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJCat83588
Yes, I would change my prediction if there was a significant injury like this. But it would be a complete insult if we found out about such a big injury through Vegas as opposed to those in the program we support. I think Vegas is wrong. At any rate, the line didn't move so it may be a misprint.

Man of many convictions and even more predictions.
 
Man of many convictions and even more predictions.
I've been on this board about a month and I really don't understand why you add negative remarks about Turk under most of his post. If there is some personal issue or you just don't like his predictions on the sports show then can you please just ignore him? I don't see him attacking you, as he seems like he has class thus far, plus he is knowledgeable on our team.

You don't seem like a bad fan until you start cluttering post under Turk.
 
I've been on this board about a month and I really don't understand why you add negative remarks about Turk under most of his post. If there is some personal issue or you just don't like his predictions on the sports show then can you please just ignore him? I don't see him attacking you, as he seems like he has class thus far, plus he is knowledgeable on our team.

You don't seem like a bad fan until you start cluttering post under Turk.

WWJD?
 
I've been on this board about a month and I really don't understand why you add negative remarks about Turk under most of his post. If there is some personal issue or you just don't like his predictions on the sports show then can you please just ignore him? I don't see him attacking you, as he seems like he has class thus far, plus he is knowledgeable on our team.

You don't seem like a bad fan until you start cluttering post under Turk.
There are many, myself included, who feel the same way. You go Turk!
 
  • Like
Reactions: IGNORE2
I've been on this board about a month and I really don't understand why you add negative remarks about Turk under most of his post. If there is some personal issue or you just don't like his predictions on the sports show then can you please just ignore him? I don't see him attacking you, as he seems like he has class thus far, plus he is knowledgeable on our team.

You don't seem like a bad fan until you start cluttering post under Turk.

His schtick is quite old. Occasionally I can't help but point out the absurdity.

Plus if you've only been here a month, yes -- Turk often makes a habit of trolling and tries to make things personal with me.
 
I've been on this board about a month and I really don't understand why you add negative remarks about Turk under most of his post. If there is some personal issue or you just don't like his predictions on the sports show then can you please just ignore him? I don't see him attacking you, as he seems like he has class thus far, plus he is knowledgeable on our team.

You don't seem like a bad fan until you start cluttering post under Turk.
I have been on for a long time and also get annoyed at the endless bickering among the posters. When asked about it, the response seems to be that they enjoy it. I quit asking about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IGNORE2
One would think that given the fact that $'s are involved these guys would have good sources.........
Yes NJ and that's what bothers me. I truly think it's just a case that Thorson was named the starter two days ago...My guess is what they meant to say was that "Thorson will start at QB fo NU"
 
If it is a ploy by VegasInsider to get more NU fans to visit their website... it worked. I never heard of it before today and have checked it four times to see if they had corrected the statement.

Seems kinda doubtful. A betting website intentionally putting out incorrect info for marketing purposes, which could cause users to lose money?
 
There is undoubtedly lingo that everyone who bets understands - a shorthand - but, and I am reaching here, perhaps "NOW ... OUT" means that the news is now out publicly. Perhaps Vegas thought they knew about Thorson's selection before the public announcement.
 
Here's a cut and paste of that section. I deleted a bunch of the numbers but you see here at the bottom the item about Thorson...171 Stanford
172 Northwestern
-10 -10
45u-10

-12 -10

Time-change to 12:00pm EDT | NOW-QB-Clayton Thorson-OUT | TV: ESPN, DTV: 206

I am still guessing that's it's simply a mistake, but this is a big site that a ton of people go to.
It seems like a mistake because if it were real news, I think other media would know about it. OTOH, as long as they let the number 2 practice all week and not try to give "injured Thorson" reps for when he comes back, I don't think it would make that big of a difference. The competition was close and # 2 just needs the reps and time to prepare.
 
There is undoubtedly lingo that everyone who bets understands - a shorthand - but, and I am reaching here, perhaps "NOW ... OUT" means that the news is now out publicly. Perhaps Vegas thought they knew about Thorson's selection before the public announcement.

Good reach, but I don't think this is the case. I scanned the list for other players listed as OUT and they are known injries, like the BYU and Arkansas RB's. I also doubt it refers to their sexual orientation.......;)
 
Good reach, but I don't think this is the case. I scanned the list for other players listed as OUT and they are known injries, like the BYU and Arkansas RB's. I also doubt it refers to their sexual orientation.......;)
Now that's funny. It's almost a basis for a movie script.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT