This is not an apologist post for the SIU game. And as everyone here knows, we were getting "upset" by FCS schools and others before it was cool.
But it seems pretty trendy right now. Is my perception of this incorrect? Because I've literally lost track of how many FCS or "bottom feeder" FBS schools have upset their hosts at what were intended to be home field squashes in the first few weeks of the season. When I saw Tulane beat K State and Eastern Michigan beat Arizona State...I didn't even blink.
Around here I see/hear talk of our coaches maybe not opening up the playbooks yet/saving for conference play, and/or perhaps not pressing starters with nagging injuries to play, or perhaps a general/overall strategic failure. But is there speculation on anything else? Is this the portal at work? Too much coaching/staff turnover? Something else?
But it seems pretty trendy right now. Is my perception of this incorrect? Because I've literally lost track of how many FCS or "bottom feeder" FBS schools have upset their hosts at what were intended to be home field squashes in the first few weeks of the season. When I saw Tulane beat K State and Eastern Michigan beat Arizona State...I didn't even blink.
Around here I see/hear talk of our coaches maybe not opening up the playbooks yet/saving for conference play, and/or perhaps not pressing starters with nagging injuries to play, or perhaps a general/overall strategic failure. But is there speculation on anything else? Is this the portal at work? Too much coaching/staff turnover? Something else?