An argument can be made in support of or against any coach simply by claiming that he has incredible talent to work with or that he has no talent to work with.
We see that with Chris Collins a lot - claiming he is great despite his record because his players are terrible.
Now you're arguing the flipside with Scheyer - he is not very good despite his very high winning percentage because he has the best players.
I'm not stating an opinion on either coach- just commenting on the arguments.
Don't really recall many saying that CC's players are terrible; certainly weren't when it came to recruiting rankings except for when the bounce from the 1st Tourney appearance had run out.
In fact, there were those touting the level of recruiting.
Well, that is a primary reason he didn’t succeed. Carmody forgot that recruiting was part of the job.
Think too much is made of this pretty much over the fact that Carmody wasn't on campus when a certain recruit came to visit (we don't know if he was away on a recruiting trip).
Recruiting, esp the underbelly, fair to say probably wasn't Carmody's favorite thing, but he wasn't a dummy and knew that recruiting was vital.
Carmody certainly had an eye for under-appreciated talent - having a streak of recruits (Juice, Shurna, Crawford and Cobb) who were all significant contributors as frosh, not to mention having a string of PGs who were able ball-handlers from the start.
There were 4 mistakes/impediments to recruiting under Bill.
1. Simply embarrassing facilities - when recruits asked to tour the facilities, the staff would make up a bogus excuse which certainly sent off red flags.
No coincidence that when the facilities were upgraded miday thru Carmody's tenure that recruiting improved.
2. Not hiring a local coach to be on the staff; took longer than it should have to develop relationships with area coaches.
3. Running the Princeton O; while there were some benefits to running the PO, it wasn't exactly the type of scheme that was attractive to recruits, which is probably why even Princeton (under BC's former right hand man no less) has gone away from it.
4. During the last couple years of the NIT run, BC was operating on a year to year contract/extension, so suffice to say, not reassuring to recruits.
All in all, Carmody's biggest failure was in getting the depth needed to overcome the inevitable injuries and/or suspensions.
Didn't help that the program would be in on some under-recruited talent, but a better established program (like Wisconsin a few times) would swoop in whenever a schollie opened up.