Dugan or Campy: +/- stats during the win streak?

[NUThump]

Do either of you have the data to isolate lineups for +/- since the switch to zone or the 4 wins? It would be interesting to see the changes.

 

[CappyNU]

First 11 games:

Team -99


+/- Exp. +/- Diff
Mac -55 -84.3 +29.3
Demps -86 -81.6 -4.4
Law -50 -52.3 +2.3
Lumpkin -69 -50.5 -18.5
Olah -48 -67.9 +19.9
Lindsey -82 -35.2 -46.8
Cobb -4 -51.2 +47.2
Skelly -26 -9.1 -16.9
Sobo -34 -25.6 -8.4
Taphorn +2 -10.5 +12.5
Kreisberg -37 -23.1 -13.9
Vassar -6 -3.8 -2.2

Last 4 games:

Team +39

+/- Exp. +/- Diff
Mac +38 +34.3 +3.7
Demps +38 +31.2 +6.8
Law +46 +20.3 +25.7
Lumpkin 0 +21.5 -21.5
Olah +21 +31.9 -10.9
Lindsey -8 +19.6 -27.6
Skelly +21 +6.6 +14.4
Sobo +4 +11.6 -7.6
Taphorn +35 +17.5 +17.5
Kreisberg 0 +0.5 -0.5
Vassar 0 0.0 0.0

 

[ricko654321]

If you're going to be lazy and ask him to do something for you, one would think you could at least spell his name correctly...

 

[NUThump]

Agreed. My apologies. I can't even blame that on autocorrect.

 

[NUThump]

Much appreciated. Sorry again about the misspelling.

 

[ricko654321]

On reflection though - Lumpkin and Lindsey are the consistent underperformers. BMac is still above team average here though less so. Demps goes from slightly below team average to slightly above - he's been playing a bit better so that makes sense.

We lose the big + impact from when Cobb is on the floor, but Vic's hugely improved play makes up for a lot of that. Also Skelly flips from a negative earlier to a positive - he's found his role as a change of pace backup center. The most consistent outperformer here is Taphorn really. Even though Vic has been playing better and earned more minutes, I think Taphorn still needs to see more time as well (provided he's healthy). Our best lineup right now in my view would be Olah, Law Taphorn, Demps McIntosh. That leaves us slightly light on height outside of Olah, but Law and Taphorn have both been decent at rebounding so I think could clear the boards well enough.

And thanks Cappy.