No thanks.Clueless. You really need a subscription to the Rock.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No thanks.Clueless. You really need a subscription to the Rock.
No thanks.
Unbelievable.. for 99.00 dollars and the best coverage of all NU major sports … why are you even following NU sportsStay uniformed. Your choice.
Why? We rarely apply that principle to the posters around here…100% Dave gold is an nu student reporter. Consider the source here.
We aren’t using all the existing schollies.Perhaps, but another way to look at it is that if Lausch did jump him, then there really is no reason to lament his departure. Probably addition by subtraction and at least we free up a scholarship for somebody who actually wants to be here and compete.
Yes, please keep your uniform onStay uniformed. Your choice.
No premium basketball boardUnbelievable.. for 99.00 dollars and the best coverage of all NU major sports … why are you even following NU sports
Not likely with a talent depleted team with no stellar D. This hot transfer they are expecting, must be a real gunslinger.Bryant was hardly a disappointment except that he only had one year of eligibility. We would be feeling pretty good now if he could play.
Talent depleted? Compared to when?Not likely with a talent depleted team with no stellar D. This hot transfer they are expecting, must be a real gunslinger.
Have a feeling Sully will be the Ryan Young of football. A bunch of posts every time our current QB burps and Sully has a gain from the line of scrimmage.
Uh Ben Bryant?If they handled it delicately, then it is on Sullivan. Only people that know are the coaches and Sullivan. Shame on Sullivan if he doesn't like a little competition for the starting job. I am no fan of portal guys. Everyone we have landed was a disappointment, with the exception of Ramsey, and he was more like a steady game manager than a gunslinger, which is all what we needed in '20. We need a gunslinger that can take off when need be for '24. No great D to bail anyone out. I wonder if an OSU or OU kid is the target.
It's interesting to me that Bryant, to a casual observer, was unimpressive until Q4 of the MN game. Then, PSUs D overwhelmed our line and injured him. Then he missed 4 games.Uh Ben Bryant?
I don't pay for groupthink.Stay uniformed. Your choice.
#wishboneNot likely with a talent depleted team with no stellar D. This hot transfer they are expecting, must be a real gunslinger.
I don't pay for groupthink.
Yeah even I don’t mind reading Coral’s posts if it means supporting Lou and Matt.How about all the work Lou and Matt put in? Would you pay for that??
No more post there - I assume it was was deleted? Whose post was it, and what did it say?
You mean all the deleted and locked posts and threads? I would pay if they really backed off or provided a non-safe space area, behind paywall or not, that those with some thicker skin could post more freely.How about all the work Lou and Matt put in? Would you pay for that??
I do pay, and I'm not happy about posts being deleted that relate to the actions of President Schill that expose the University to potential legal liability. Why this is not relevant to athletics, such as recruiting, is beyond me. However, I won't hold my breath waiting for a response from the mods.You mean all the deleted and locked posts and threads? I would pay if they really backed off or provided a non-safe space area, behind paywall or not, that those with some thicker skin could post more freely.
Paying to get censored for the benefit of maybe getting a little information a bit earlier seems to send the wrong message 🤷♂️
It's not related to athletics, because he is testifying about a political issue, not an athletic issue.I do pay, and I'm not happy about posts being deleted that relate to the actions of President Schill that expose the University to potential legal liability. Why this is not relevant to athletics, such as recruiting, is beyond me. However, I won't hold my breath waiting for a response from the mods.
But I still wonder what it means for the football lawsuits after Schill is canned.It's not related to athletics, because he is testifying about a political issue, not an athletic issue.
I suppose we'll cross that bridge when your hypothetical comes true or doesn't.But I still wonder what it means for the football lawsuits after Schill is canned.
I find it ridiculous to say this when Hilinski has played solidly in the SEC at South Carolina against the likes of Alabama and Georgia, not to mention his earlier games at NU. Not exactly sure what happened after that / but I do wonder if it’s the same thing that happened to Hunter Johnson, and if it was more Bajakian and Fitz and our offense than it was the QB, and whether Lujuan might fix him. I’m not saying it’s gonna happen but I do wonder and as far as potentially be a solid back up, I would say he can be that at least, and he has proven the ability to win games probably more so than Sullivan ever did (Hilinski has won more games as a starting P5 QB than Sullivan).
Not disputing this, but why wasn’t he as terrified when Bama and Georgia was sending their pressure against him? Were the Cock WRs and OLs so much better than ours?To me, Hilinski looked terrified at times, back when he was playing.
The O-line was porous and he'd look downfield and either
a) see that nobody was open
or
b) see a blur of activity and not be able to identify his open receiver(s).
Then he'd look at the guys coming toward him and duck or start running for his life.
Ben Bryant stood in there, felt the pressure and threw good passes.
However, Hilinski probably has a better arm in practice.
I hope he isn't a hopeless case. Its possible he'd be okay with better blocking and targets.
Hunter was bad under Mick as well. He had his only good game (MSU) under Jake. That game was 59.5 minutes of garbage time, though, due to JON.Or did Bajakian just ruin him and Hunter?
Not disputing this, but why wasn’t he as terrified when Bama and Georgia was sending their pressure against him? Were the Cock WRs and OLs so much better than ours?
Or did Bajakian just ruin him and Hunter?
Our top 5 D under Hank looked horrible the next year, many of the same players looked completely different under JON, and then they magically became decent again when Braun took over. I can’t help but to believe it maybe could have been the coaching and schemes.
Disagree, but at this point arguing will get me nowhere.It's not related to athletics, because he is testifying about a political issue, not an athletic issue.
He is at the pinnacle of everything NU, including Wildcat athletics, in these unprecedented times.. And we are still getting to know him. That makes nearly everything about his public activities both interesting and relevant to us fans. We want to know and share opinions about the man in charge.It's not related to athletics, because he is testifying about a political issue, not an athletic issue.
All of these items you've mentioned are related to athletics in some way, so no, I would not remove them. What Schill is testifying about currently is not related to athletics.Would you tank discussions about KAH speaking to Congress about Biden's re-writing of Title IX? Or the state of women's sports and transgenderism? Or the impact of state NIL laws on the landscape of highly successful non-revenue women's sports? I hope not. Sometimes sports and politics and/or the law merge to create issues we fans are interested in.
Duly noted.Let me respectfully object to substituting your judgment and heavy handed censorship for the informed wishes of your NU sports fans.
Very well put my old friend, Your post reads like a blurb from an appellate court brief or argument. You are right and Cappy is wrong, but he'll never admit it. Nonetheless, I'm happy because I can continue to savor your post for some time. Hope all is well with you and yours.He is at the pinnacle of everything NU, including Wildcat athletics, in these unprecedented times.. And we are still getting to know him. That makes nearly everything about his public activities both interesting and relevant to us fans. We want to know and share opinions about the man in charge.
Would you tank discussions about KAH speaking to Congress about Biden's re-writing of Title IX? Or the state of women's sports and transgenderism? Or the impact of state NIL laws on the landscape of highly successful non-revenue women's sports? I hope not. Sometimes sports and politics and/or the law merge to create issues we fans are interested in.
Let me respectfully object to substituting your judgment and heavy handed censorship for the informed wishes of your NU sports fans.
GOUNUII
Northwestern’s President is testifying before the United States Congress, and we can’t discuss the potential athletic consequences of his performance/testimony?All of these items you've mentioned are related to athletics in some way, so no, I would not remove them. What Schill is testifying about currently is not related to athletics.
Duly noted.
It’s sad about the censorship. I have never met Cap like I have with you or GoNU, sure he is a passionate NU fan and overall great dude, but he has a huge blind spot to the impact of University mismanagement as it relates to Athletics and he’ll never admit it. I would love to share a libation with him some day.Very well put my old friend, Your post reads like a blurb from an appellate court brief or argument. You are right and Cappy is wrong, but he'll never admit it. Nonetheless, I'm happy because I can continue to savor your post for some time. Hope all is well with you and yours.
Firmly agree with all of this!It’s sad about the censorship. I have never met Cap like I have with you or GoNU, sure he is a passionate NU fan and overall great dude, but he has a huge blind spot to the impact of University mismanagement as it relates to Athletics and he’ll never admit it. I would love to share a libation with him some day.
An overwhelming number of folks disagreeing and pleading for leniency hasn’t gotten him to re-evaluate that position, so you two successful counselors aren’t likely to sway his thought process. Ironically, I believe all this issues would just play out and die in normal thread discourse, but digging his heels in actually exacerbates the situation.
Apparently not.Northwestern’s President is testifying before the United States Congress, and we can’t discuss the potential athletic consequences of his performance/testimony?
Schill is intimately related to the force and direction of Northwestern Athletics. At a time when both NU and the college sports world remain embroiled in athletic, political and legal uncertainty. Being the new kid on the block and having already ignited a firestorm of dissension on several fronts, I think it's pretty obvious that Wildcat fans would like to size him up in whatever context he appears and no matter the subject. We don't get many chances to do that. In fact, his comments on a subject far removed from athletics could be extremely telling on what kind of cloth he's cut from and what we can expect from him as we work our way through multiple challenges to NU remaining competitive at the highest level of college athletics.All of these items you've mentioned are related to athletics in some way, so no, I would not remove them. What Schill is testifying about currently is not related to athletics.
Duly noted.
It’s sad about the censorship. I have never met Cap like I have with you or GoNU, sure he is a passionate NU fan and overall great dude, but he has a huge blind spot to the impact of University mismanagement as it relates to Athletics and he’ll never admit it. I would love to share a libation with him some day.
An overwhelming number of folks disagreeing and pleading for leniency hasn’t gotten him to re-evaluate that position, so you two successful counselors aren’t likely to sway his thought process. Ironically, I believe all this issues would just play out and die in normal thread discourse, but digging his heels in actually exacerbates the situation.
What are the potential athletic consequences of him testifying in regards to political protests on campus? Again, if his testimony was about improperly firing football coaches, hazing in sports, or any of the things GoU mentioned, by all means, have at it.Northwestern’s President is testifying before the United States Congress, and we can’t discuss the potential athletic consequences of his performance/testimony?