If we're going to play that game, then we have to go back to 1992.Sexual abuse is now accepted, even promoted, at our highest level of government. NU and CMT are on the right side of this, to go for the facts and root it out, based upon evidence.
Sexual predators have sadly been around since before humans started evolving 100K years ago.If we're going to play that game, then we have to go back to 1992.
I have been highly suspicious of the “hazing” claims purely because of the lack of publicly available evidence and the inconsistencies in behavior by NU in response to “hazing.”The hazing in Evanston was not limited to the football program. Fitz deserved to be fired with cause. Sexual predation has been prevalent at NU for decades: the football program’s abuse was both a symptom and a cause.
What would surprise most posters? While the people on this message board persist in demonizing the Truth.. NUFB players of all types are on my side.
Including some Rose bowl 1995 alumni!
Fitz’s shitty lawyers had better brace themselves.
I’mFitz was the heart of recruiting and in his second year on staff (first as LB coach) in 2002.
He was in the locker room at various points, was a big talker, and saw the head shavings. He didn’t care. He just wanted to get the best recruits he could, a la Barnett.
yeah, this is what I have been saying. “This is a huge scandal and Fitz must be fired immediately.” Then followed up with absolutely nothing. If it was so bad, then how is it addressed by only firing the HC?Well, when it comes to NU and the alleged behavior in the football program...
NU led with... "It was really, really bad" and they claimed they had no other moral choice but to fire Fitzgerald, who may not have known, but "should have."
And then they followed with "It really wasn't that bad" and no alleged perpetrator was punished or even named.
People, judges and juries can see the contradiction without trying - and it looks entirely like NU was trying to weasel out of a contract.
That is fair.I have been highly suspicious of the “hazing” claims purely because of the lack of publicly available evidence and the inconsistencies in behavior by NU in response to “hazing.”
I am not “demonizing the truth” but attempting to discern it. If your efforts can contribute to our understanding what has actually transpired, I wholeheartedly support them.
Let’s see the evidence!
Happy Thanksgiving too, pal! 🦃Worst moderator ever. Allows a lunatic to post disparaging nonsense detrimental to the program during peak recruiting times.
This garbage is visible to prospective recruits and their parents. Pathetic.