Things where we agree: a) I trust Fitz to (eventually) do the right thing. b) we don't truly know how accountable he is and c) He has a stock of trust or "goodwill" upon which he can draw.
Where we disagree: i) He is too slow to react, and often reacts poorly, to adverse situations. We were so thrilled to get rid of McCall, and so outraged with JON this year, that nobody notices that the offense is basically as bad as 2019. Ryan Day stuck Kerry Coombs in the doghouse after one bad game and hired a top DC as soon as the season was over. Bert exceeded all expectations and STILL fired his OC. We are stuck with tweedle-dum and tweedle-dumber as coordinators. Stubborn or slow to react, I don't care, but he's not taking the necessary steps ii) I hope we can agree that he is often an insolent, arrogant pr1ck in interviews, often to people less than half his age who tentatively try to ask tough questions about his moribund team. This shows a lack of accountability and respect, at least to fans and the press. Perhaps Gragg has him by the bal1s, but in public, Fitz does and says what he wants. c) his accumulated trust, as you say, is accurate. We are not like other programs in that respect, but for Duke and TCU to get rid of, arguably their best coaches ever (TCU) or in my long lifetime (Duke) is indicative that other schools are willing to cash-out of their positions if the coach breaks the trust.
Further to i) above, I am concerned that, even if he rights the ship, it may not be sustainable in the portal/NIL era.