ADVERTISEMENT

Cats land 2025 Rivals150 point guard Jake West

The problem with Smith is he is Purdue's three star, undersized midget and not NU's. If he was a Collins recruit we would absolutely love his running around on the perimeter tossing passes back and forth looking intense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJCat
The problem with Smith is he is Purdue's three star, undersized midget and not NU's. If he was a Collins recruit we would absolutely love his running around on the perimeter tossing passes back and forth looking intense.
But we wouldn't argue he's the best player in the BIG this season.
 
The nice thing about all of this, as already said before, is that we will all get a chance to see how Smith does without Edey. He has a lot of experience under his belt now and this is the year he can either live up to the hype or not.
 
I think the hate for Braden Smith stems from all the Purdue fans who seemed to think he was vastly superior to Boo. Smith became touted because he was a freshman who could survive on the court by passing the ball to Edey all night long without messing it up too much. That elevated him to stardom in his second season, though he's never really truly displayed true star playmaking ability. Yet, Purdue fans thought he was the best point guard in the league despite the guy balling out in Evanston.
I think some of the love for Smith also stems from the fact that he's a very traditional point guard. He drives, creates movement, distributes, and shoots well enough to always be a threat to fire which creates further space for the defense. He's not hero ball scoring option #1 like Boo who was able to create and generate for his teammates but was ALSO the focus of his own team's scoring. People like that old school playing style, I think.
 
At the risk of completely turning this thread to Purdue, I had to chuckle when I saw that Zach Edey fouled out in 15 minutes in his NBA debut last night. This ain't college kid. That slow, plodding crap won't cut it at the next level.
 
At the risk of completely turning this thread to Purdue, I had to chuckle when I saw that Zach Edey fouled out in 15 minutes in his NBA debut last night. This ain't college kid. That slow, plodding crap won't cut it at the next level.

Gonna take a wild guess that the fouls were largely bs.
Its the NBA. If you're in the club you can draw a foul on every play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoralSpringsCat
I dunno. I didn't watch the game, but I've seen a lot of Edey playing and if he played in the NBA the way he played for Purdue, I can see him fouling out a lot. The NBA is full of VIPs and he isn't going to be able to just throw elbows and arm lock guys with impunity at this level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: No Chores
If I hated every player that’s fanbase overrated their own players, I would hate the whole conference.

This is an interesting assumption about other fanbases.
Around these parts, there are people with a habit of degrading everybody on the team until that player proves them wrong.

Martinelli ("clownish") and Nicholson ("useless") come immediately to mind, but even Buie had haters into his 3rd season.

Is that a Northwestern thing?
 
Count me among those who though Martinelli looked goofy and awkward when he first came in. Of course, I like to think that was almost a compliment, because it lulls other teams into a false sense of confidence. No way this guy can be this good around the rim! It took most of the year for the Big Ten to realize he's a lefty!

Boo *was* really frustrating early in his career. I don't even think the biggest Boo supporters on this board could have foreseen when he was a freshman how great he was going to be by the time he was a senior.

As for NU fans overrating players, I just don't see it. One thing I noticed in the Wisconsin game last week was how much the announcers were hyping NU players that even our own fanbase is meh about, like Joe Himon and Thomas Gordon. My thought was: am I underrating these guys? I didn't think so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PurpleWhiteBoy
This is an interesting assumption about other fanbases.
Around these parts, there are people with a habit of degrading everybody on the team until that player proves them wrong.

Martinelli ("clownish") and Nicholson ("useless") come immediately to mind, but even Buie had haters into his 3rd season.

Is that a Northwestern thing?

I think it mostly, not entirely, reflects fans without much detailed knowledge about a sport having either never played or at best played at a backyard level, so they resort to stereotypical thinking and/or group think until a player makes a case that they can't criticize. I don't know that NU fans are particularly unique in that regard, however.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: PurpleWhiteBoy
Come on..... not everything is a conspiracy.

The NBA has gone to great lengths to legislate the old-fashioned centers out of the league... so there is a business motive (or preference) to make sure guys like Edey fail.

In fact, I predicted that Edey would get the short end of the stick in the NBA for that reason. Obviously the NBA controls its referees.

Whether Edey can overcome it remains to be seen.
 
At the risk of completely turning this thread to Purdue, I had to chuckle when I saw that Zach Edey fouled out in 15 minutes in his NBA debut last night. This ain't college kid. That slow, plodding crap won't cut it at the next level.
People should me smarter than to draw conclusions based on someone’s first week in the NBA.
 
People should me smarter than to draw conclusions based on someone’s first week in the NBA.
I'm not concluding anything. I'm just having a little fun in the moment with a rival.

That said, my Boston Celtics are unquestionably on pace to finish the season undefeated, winning every game by 20+ points!!
 
This is an interesting assumption about other fanbases.
Around these parts, there are people with a habit of degrading everybody on the team until that player proves them wrong.

Martinelli ("clownish") and Nicholson ("useless") come immediately to mind, but even Buie had haters into his 3rd season.

Is that a Northwestern thing?
It's called Battered Cat Fan Syndrome. Primary symptoms are mental and emotional fatigue. Advanced cases are typically found among those age 55 and over. Deeply rooted in long term losing and associated early fandom trauma. Compensatory psychological behavior centers on maintaining very low expectations for success. Also known as We Can't Have Nice Things Syndrome.

No known cure. Though recent studies suggest post season hoops dancing - combined with large doses of KAH lacrosse therapy - can temporarily ease symptoms.

Warning: This is a high risk for regression disease. Just when you think ...

GOUNUII
 
It's called Battered Cat Fan Syndrome. Primary symptoms are mental and emotional fatigue. Advanced cases are typically found among those age 55 and over. Deeply rooted in long term losing and associated early fandom trauma. Compensatory psychological behavior centers on maintaining very low expectations for success. Also known as We Can't Have Nice Things Syndrome.

No known cure. Though recent studies suggest post season hoops dancing - combined with large doses of KAH lacrosse therapy - can temporarily ease symptoms.

Warning: This is a high risk for regression disease. Just when you think ...

GOUNUII
Keystone Light Post of the Week!
 
  • Like
Reactions: No Chores
It's called Battered Cat Fan Syndrome. Primary symptoms are mental and emotional fatigue. Advanced cases are typically found among those age 55 and over. Deeply rooted in long term losing and associated early fandom trauma. Compensatory psychological behavior centers on maintaining very low expectations for success. Also known as We Can't Have Nice Things Syndrome.

No known cure. Though recent studies suggest post season hoops dancing - combined with large doses of KAH lacrosse therapy - can temporarily ease symptoms.

Warning: This is a high risk for regression disease. Just when you think ...

GOUNUII
As someone who is just under 55, do I need to get it checked out yet, or should I wait until my 55th birthday?
 
It's called Battered Cat Fan Syndrome. Primary symptoms are mental and emotional fatigue. Advanced cases are typically found among those age 55 and over. Deeply rooted in long term losing and associated early fandom trauma. Compensatory psychological behavior centers on maintaining very low expectations for success. Also known as We Can't Have Nice Things Syndrome.

No known cure. Though recent studies suggest post season hoops dancing - combined with large doses of KAH lacrosse therapy - can temporarily ease symptoms.

Warning: This is a high risk for regression disease. Just when you think ...

GOUNUII

I think you're pretty damned close... but I witnessed every home loss during our record-breaking football streak and reveled when we finally beat NIU and Minnesota. I'm not scarred. I went to as many basketball games in McGaw as I could - as long as somebody else was up for it. I don't think of NU as unlucky or cursed or "chokers" or anything like that.

Barnett and Walker and Fitz showed what was possible at NU if you played to your strengths. Collins eventually picked up that torch...

Because of those successes, I never bought into the "We Can't Have Nice Things" notion. Unfortunately, the playing field has tilted and now NIL is a real threat. The administration seems somewhat out of touch and self-destructive. Northwestern may have too much at stake as an academic institution to try to compete with a bunch of minor league sports franchises masquerading as universities.

I guess we'll see how that plays out, but I look at our basketball team in recent years and see plenty of talent and desire. Sometimes that talent is sitting on the bench. But all you really have to do is watch a young guy play and see if he is out there competing or if he is intimidated. Hunger, Nicholson, Martinelli, Buie, Barnhizer, Young, Berry - those guys all played aggressively when given their earliest opportunities. Of course they made mistakes, but winners learn and adjust.

If a young guy enters a game and starts looking for his mommy, thats a bad indication.
If he gets after his opponent, I'm going to assume he can contribute.
The players generally know how they measure up - sometimes even more than the coaches.
 
If a young guy enters a game and starts looking for his mommy, that's a bad indication.
This is why I have high hopes for Mullins. He and Blake Smith definitely made mistakes last year, as inexperienced guys do, but they didn't seem terrified of being on the court
 
I think some of the love for Smith also stems from the fact that he's a very traditional point guard. He drives, creates movement, distributes, and shoots well enough to always be a threat to fire which creates further space for the defense. He's not hero ball scoring option #1 like Boo who was able to create and generate for his teammates but was ALSO the focus of his own team's scoring. People like that old school playing style, I think.
From a basketball substack I read:

I just know what I’ve got and what I’m getting here, which is more than what I can say about a good-but-flawed Tier 2 and a mish-mash of gold and trash in Tier 3. The floor and ceiling for Purdue are simply higher than anybody else. And, yes, it’s time to defend Braden Smith from the haters because I already got to defend Painter.​
Smith’s numbers last year benefitted from playing with Zach Edey. Obviously. I would imagine that’s as unsurprising as it gets. When Smith shared the floor with Edey, he was dominant: a 121 ORtg on 22% USG, a 38% Assist%, 43% from three. All those things. And yes, in limited action without Edey, Smith’s own efficiency suffered and he committed more turnovers. But it wasn’t catastrophic. He still had a high assist rate, hit 44% of his threes, hit 44% of his midrange twos. It could be time for the average Joe to admit he’s just a really good player. His +8.2 BPM leads all Big Ten players with 2023-24 stats.​
The guy's a Tennessee fan so he has no bias in his write-up from a conference rival standpoint. Guess we'll see what Smith does in a few weeks.
 
Barnett and Walker and Fitz showed what was possible at NU if you played to your strengths. Collins eventually picked up that torch...

Because of those successes, I never bought into the "We Can't Have Nice Things" notion. Unfortunately, the playing field has tilted and now NIL is a real threat. The administration seems somewhat out of touch and self-destructive. Northwestern may have too much at stake as an academic institution to try to compete with a bunch of minor league sports franchises masquerading as universities.

I guess we'll see how that plays out, but I look at our basketball team in recent years and see plenty of talent and desire. Sometimes that talent is sitting on the bench. But all you really have to do is watch a young guy play and see if he is out there competing or if he is intimidated. Hunger, Nicholson, Martinelli, Buie, Barnhizer, Young, Berry - those guys all played aggressively when given their earliest opportunities. Of course they made mistakes, but winners learn and adjust.

If a young guy enters a game and starts looking for his mommy, thats a bad indication.
If he gets after his opponent, I'm going to assume he can contribute.
The players generally know how they measure up - sometimes even more than the coaches.
I’d be interested in your expanding on Collins eventually getting to “if you played to your strengths”. He coached the team to better records every year since his hiring, on his way to our first-ever NCAA team (and win). And did every other NU bball or football coach not listed by you not play to our strengths?
 
This is an interesting assumption about other fanbases.
Around these parts, there are people with a habit of degrading everybody on the team until that player proves them wrong.

Martinelli ("clownish") and Nicholson ("useless") come immediately to mind, but even Buie had haters into his 3rd season.

Is that a Northwestern thing?
No
 
The NBA has gone to great lengths to legislate the old-fashioned centers out of the league... so there is a business motive (or preference) to make sure guys like Edey fail.

In fact, I predicted that Edey would get the short end of the stick in the NBA for that reason. Obviously the NBA controls its referees.

Whether Edey can overcome it remains to be seen.
Old fashioned centers can't make it in the league because they can't shoot threes and because they get caught out on the perimeter guarding smaller and quicker players when switching on the pick and rolls. It's not that complicated. The NBA didn't "legislate" this as much as teams found ways to utilize their freakishly athletic players and exploit the slower, less mobile ones.

In his game tonight, Edey scored 13 points and grabbed nine rebounds, while committing only four fouls. Better effort, though his team lost by 20 to the Rockets.
 
Old fashioned centers can't make it in the league because they can't shoot threes and because they get caught out on the perimeter guarding smaller and quicker players when switching on the pick and rolls. It's not that complicated. The NBA didn't "legislate" this as much as teams found ways to utilize their freakishly athletic players and exploit the slower, less mobile ones.

In his game tonight, Edey scored 13 points and grabbed nine rebounds, while committing only four fouls. Better effort, though his team lost by 20 to the Rockets.
The great NBA renaissance: realizing 3 points is more than 2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: No Chores
I’d be interested in your expanding on Collins eventually getting to “if you played to your strengths”. He coached the team to better records every year since his hiring, on his way to our first-ever NCAA team (and win). And did every other NU bball or football coach not listed by you not play to our strengths?

CC went away from what worked when he got too infatuated with forwards shooting the long ball, and initially, went with an up-tempo O which exhausted the starters, which was a problem as there was little/no depth behind them.

CC, like pretty much every coach, has made his fair share of mistakes, but unlike some others we have seen, he doesn't seem to be making the same ones over and over again.

CC has the program back on track with regard to style of play and team composition/roster building.

Not that concerned about individual player rankings as most of CC's best players were under-ranked.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: IGNORE2
The depth at guard starting next year (especially guys that can play lead/point guard) is going to really serve us well. It's our main question mark this year.
 
CC went away from what worked when he got too infatuated with forwards shooting the long ball, and initially, went with an up-tempo O which exhausted the starters, which was a problem as there was little/no depth behind them.

CC, like pretty much every coach, has made his fair share of mistakes, but unlike some others we have seen, he doesn't seem to be making the same ones over and over again.

CC has the program back on track with regard to style of play and team composition/roster building.

Not that concerned about individual player rankings as most of CC's best players were under-ranked.
Thanks. I agree CCC toned down the faster-paced, fast break tendency, which helped our depth issue as you said and also mitigated our inability to finish breaks at the rim. This was even during his first run to the tourney (which is the timeframe that really matters here since he found success early on).
 
Old fashioned centers can't make it in the league because they can't shoot threes and because they get caught out on the perimeter guarding smaller and quicker players when switching on the pick and rolls. It's not that complicated. The NBA didn't "legislate" this as much as teams found ways to utilize their freakishly athletic players and exploit the slower, less mobile ones.

In his game tonight, Edey scored 13 points and grabbed nine rebounds, while committing only four fouls. Better effort, though his team lost by 20 to the Rockets.

Here is an article describing how the expected value of a 2 point attempt is now higher than the expected value of a 3 point attempt in the NBA. Worth reading for those who want actual data (instead of relying on "their observations").

 
Here is an article describing how the expected value of a 2 point attempt is now higher than the expected value of a 3 point attempt in the NBA. Worth reading for those who want actual data (instead of relying on "their observations").

I’d be curious to see a shot chart of these new high-value 2-pointers. Feels like they wouldn’t be worth so much if teams weren’t jacking up threes and opening up the lane and high-percentage shots within 5 feet. It’s all connected, no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PurpleWhiteBoy
I’d be curious to see a shot chart of these new high-value 2-pointers. Feels like they wouldn’t be worth so much if teams weren’t jacking up threes and opening up the lane and high-percentage shots within 5 feet. It’s all connected, no?
Yes. Players are taking a lot less mid-range jumpers. I assume the corner 3 is still the highest valued shot in basketball but passing up layups to pass it for a 3 will hopefully be reevaluated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PurpleWhiteBoy
I haven’t read the article yet, but I’m going to guess that one of the value inflators for the modern two is the NBA disinterest in defense leading to a marked increase free throws awarded for charging.

Two point plays becoming three point plays and all that.
 
I’d be curious to see a shot chart of these new high-value 2-pointers. Feels like they wouldn’t be worth so much if teams weren’t jacking up threes and opening up the lane and high-percentage shots within 5 feet. It’s all connected, no?
Yes. Players are taking a lot less mid-range jumpers. I assume the corner 3 is still the highest valued shot in basketball but passing up layups to pass it for a 3 will hopefully be reevaluated.
I haven’t read the article yet, but I’m going to guess that one of the value inflators for the modern two is the NBA disinterest in defense leading to a marked increase free throws awarded for charging.

Two point plays becoming three point plays and all that.
There is not a disinterest in playing defense in the NBA. Just rosters filled with great scorers. No weak links like in college. Boo is not on an NBA roster and he was often unstoppable in college.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdamOnFirst
Yes. Players are taking a lot less mid-range jumpers. I assume the corner 3 is still the highest valued shot in basketball but passing up layups to pass it for a 3 will hopefully be reevaluated.

There is not a disinterest in playing defense in the NBA. Just rosters filled with great scorers. No weak links like in college. Boo is not on an NBA roster and he was often unstoppable in college.
Shot charts of the last bunch of years in the NBA are fascinating. The mid range 2 um has disappeared drastically. Hence why twos are now even more valuable than 3s: the twos taken are overwhelmingly in close, high percentage looks, and also drawing contact.

I’m not a big NBA fan, but the league is filled with guys well over 7 feet who can drive, handle, dunk, distribute, and make it rain from 30 feet. The level of athleticism, size, and skill is truly insane. Back in my day people are just cranky olds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hungry Jack
Thanks. I agree CCC toned down the faster-paced, fast break tendency, which helped our depth issue as you said and also mitigated our inability to finish breaks at the rim. This was even during his first run to the tourney (which is the timeframe that really matters here since he found success early on).

CC pretty much stopped that up-tempo scheme about a 3rd of the way thru his first season, when the roster was really thin on depth.

Didn't really have a problem with utilizing the fast-break at times during the 1st Tourney season since that team had the players (include better depth) to take advantage of it when the opportunity arose.
 
Yes. Players are taking a lot less mid-range jumpers. I assume the corner 3 is still the highest valued shot in basketball but passing up layups to pass it for a 3 will hopefully be reevaluated.

There is not a disinterest in playing defense in the NBA. Just rosters filled with great scorers. No weak links like in college. Boo is not on an NBA roster and he was often unstoppable in college.
I meant disinterest on the part of the refs in calling offensive fouls.
 
Jake West is more athletic than credited.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT