No resistance is inaccurate.The defense has been exposed way too many times this year. Ace Bailey is incredibly talented, but we're meeting him with no resistance - and that's disappointing,
You do not need to stop every bullet man. It makes you someone that cannot see the praise the coach gets because all you see is the negative comments. I’ve praised, for example, taking Berry off the starting 5. I’ve been very complimentary of Collins.Some guys appreciate great offensive talent. Some guys denigrate our coaching staff. Life is a bowl of cherries.
I read the praise and appreciate it and agree with them. I read the criticisms and largely disagree with many of them (not all, of course - no one is perfect) just like the recent one about not defending Bailey. Some folks criticize me for defending Collins. Others should not be afraid to be criticized for being called out when being so quick and frequent to criticize him.You do not need to stop every bullet man. It makes you someone that cannot see the praise the coach gets because all you see is the negative comments. I’ve praised, for example, taking Berry off the starting 5. I’ve been very complimentary of Collins.
No coach is immune to making mistakes. It does not make them bad coaches, it just makes them human.
And I still think we’ll win this.
The problem with this team is not defense. It’s offense and has been all year.The defense has been exposed way too many times this year. Ace Bailey is incredibly talented, but we're meeting him with no resistance - and that's disappointing,
Because they have several shooters and bigs that can score if left wide open.We don’t have a real offense. That’s the big problem. Without a PG, we don’t run sets and that’s on Collins. He didn’t get Blackmon (the guy who went to Miami) but still could run sets like Wisconsin used to with their flex offense. Why aren’t we?
Offense was not great. No questioning that.We don’t have a real offense. That’s the big problem. Without a PG, we don’t run sets and that’s on Collins. He didn’t get Blackmon (the guy who went to Miami) but still could run sets like Wisconsin used to with their flex offense. Why aren’t we?
Coach and players sounded vaguely similar to me after the game though.Some guys appreciate great offensive talent. Some guys denigrate our coaching staff. Life is a box of chocolates.
Effort in the 2nd half was better, we just couldn't shoot. But there was no excuse for the first 20 minutes. None. They got disspirited because a good player went off. That's inexcusable.Offense was not great. No questioning that.
But consider this:
1) We average 73.5 ppg in conference. We scored 72
2) Rutgers averages 71.8 ppg in conference. They scored 79 without Dyland Harper, a top 3 draft pick
3) Vegas believed this was a 138.5 points game. It was a 151 points game
We lost the game, and frankly were disapointingly not that close to winning it, because we could not stop a fairly mediocre team
Not so eye popping but, in the spirit of fairness and to not deny offense was not good, at all:
1) We allow 77.3 ppg on average, we allowed 79. But we allowed this with the toughest front loaded schedule of the B1G
2) Rutgers allows 76.6 ppg, they allowed 72
Agreed, but when you have defensive efforts like the first 20 minutes, that magnifies it.We don’t have a real offense. That’s the big problem. Without a PG, we don’t run sets and that’s on Collins. He didn’t get Blackmon (the guy who went to Miami) but still could run sets like Wisconsin used to with their flex offense. Why aren’t we?
The effort was way better than against Illinois. The effort against Illinois was abysmal. Last night, we should have tried something different when he went off. Deny, double, hard foul, don’t know if it would have made any difference. This was not a lack of effort!Agreed, but when you have defensive efforts like the first 20 minutes, that magnifies it.
And thank goodness. The guy has been a total bust at Miami. 0 points again last night.He didn’t get Blackmon (the guy who went to Miami)
By my estimate, which could be entirely wrong if I've screwed up the math, based on the schedules thus far, in a 65 possession game, we were expected to score 74 points (1.138 PPP) and they were expected to score 65.4 (1.006 PPP). Clearly, we had a defensive problem last night, but our offense also looked like garbage for long stretches of the game.Offense was not great. No questioning that.
But consider this:
1) We average 73.5 ppg in conference. We scored 72
2) Rutgers averages 71.8 ppg in conference. They scored 79 without Dyland Harper, a top 3 draft pick
3) Vegas believed this was a 138.5 points game. It was a 151 points game
We lost the game, and frankly were disapointingly not that close to winning it, because we could not stop a fairly mediocre team
Not so eye popping but, in the spirit of fairness and to not deny offense was not good, at all:
1) We allow 77.3 ppg on average, we allowed 79. But we allowed this with the toughest front loaded schedule of the B1G
2) Rutgers allows 76.6 ppg, they allowed 72
Time | NU PPP (5 min) | RU PPP (5min) | NU PPP (cumulative) | RU PPP (cumulative) |
5:00 | 1.571 | 0.571 | 1.571 | 0.571 |
10:00 | 0.875 | 1.625 | 1.200 | 1.133 |
15:00 | 1.571 | 2.000 | 1.318 | 1.409 |
Halftime | 0.857 | 1.714 | 1.207 | 1.483 |
25:00 | 1.000 | 0.571 | 1.167 | 1.306 |
30:00 | 0.600 | 0.800 | 1.043 | 1.196 |
35:00 | 1.286 | 2.000 | 1.075 | 1.302 |
Final | 1.250 | 0.833 | 1.108 | 1.215 |
Yeah, the simplification of my numbers is they do not account for tempo. But I'm glad that the whole idea of "our offense was not good but our biggest problem was defense" holds.By my estimate, which could be entirely wrong if I've screwed up the math, based on the schedules thus far, in a 65 possession game, we were expected to score 74 points (1.138 PPP) and they were expected to score 65.4 (1.006 PPP). Clearly, we had a defensive problem last night, but our offense also looked like garbage for long stretches of the game.
Here's how the PPP looked throughout the game:
Time NU PPP (5 min) RU PPP (5min) NU PPP (cumulative) RU PPP (cumulative) 5:00 1.571 0.571 1.571 0.571 10:00 0.875 1.625 1.200 1.133 15:00 1.571 2.000 1.318 1.409 Halftime 0.857 1.714 1.207 1.483 25:00 1.000 0.571 1.167 1.306 30:00 0.600 0.800 1.043 1.196 35:00 1.286 2.000 1.075 1.302 Final 1.250 0.833 1.108 1.215
The problem was defense in the first half, as after we went up 13-4, Ace Bailey himself outscored us 24-22 the rest of the half, while the rest of Rutgers added another 15. The first 8 minutes of the 2nd half sealed the game though, as the defense arrived only for the offense to collapse into disaster, going scoreless for over 5 minutes in that stretch. Extremely disappointing night.
Agree to disagree, especially in the FIRST half. But yes, way better than Illinois.The effort was way better than against Illinois. The effort against Illinois was abysmal. Last night, we should have tried something different when he went off. Deny, double, hard foul, don’t know if it would have made any difference. This was not a lack of effort!
I have a hard time questioning players effort unless it is blatantly obvious. At Illinois, it was a lay up drill and I too didn’t see much intensity. Probably the only time I saw it all year.Agree to disagree, especially in the FIRST half. But yes, way better than Illinois.
Point being .... why would that happen 2x in 4 days?