JK, but he's now a better player than he was 24 hours ago when he was a 3 star, right?
I'm with Deeringfish on this one. Whatever you think of the star system, this young man has worked hard and seeing an unbiased source recognize his abilities and hard work is a strong positive for which he should be congratulated.I undertand the star debate and the imperfection of the data behind stars but when one of our guys gets upgraded, I think it would be nice to just say congratulations. I'm sure he has worked really hard and now he is getting some recognition.
Regardless of how you think, other recruits will look at the quality of this class based on stars and be influenced, wanting to join a strong class.
Congrats Roderick!
Go Cats!
JK, but he's now a better player than he was 24 hours ago when he was a 3 star, right?
Earlier today The commitment list showed Campbell as a four star and 5.8. It now again shows him as three-star and 5.7. Don't know what is going onI must be dense because I cannot find any change in ratings to NU commits. What are you talking about?
Earlier today The commitment list showed Campbell as a four star and 5.8. It now again shows him as three-star and 5.7. Don't know what is going on
OK< That is weird. ...LOUEarlier today The commitment list showed Campbell as a four star and 5.8. It now again shows him as three-star and 5.7. Don't know what is going on
I'm not talking about what you wrote because I know it's in jest, but I never understood why people on this board get so upset when a player was upgraded to a 4 star. Yes, the player is the same player when he moved up to 4 stars and is the same player when that was switched back to 3 stars. No he will not be better or worse next year based on stars.JK, but he's now a better player than he was 24 hours ago when he was a 3 star, right?
OK< That is weird. ...LOU