Why can't we win the whole darned thing?Y'all are counting wins and I'm over here thinking that's there's no reason we can't finish in the top three of the conference.
Why can't we win the whole darned thing?Y'all are counting wins and I'm over here thinking that's there's no reason we can't finish in the top three of the conference.
As competitive as ever, yes. As strong as ever, I would say no. Think it's about in the middle relative to history.There are not the top teams but the rest of the conference is as strong and competitive as I have seen it. The conference is very competitive this year.
ACC.
As competitive as ever, yes. As strong as ever, I would say no. Think it's about in the middle relative to history.
I think there are 10 B1G teams in the top 65 of Ken Pom, which sounds good... until you realize there are 11 ACC teams in the top 50 (out of 15 total). And they have 7 in the top 30, the B1G has 3. But because of the depth of the middle of the conference we should have 6-7 teams that make it into the tournament still.
Yeah, I'm not saying the conference is trash by any means. We are solid but not great this year without the elite teams at the top. It'll be the sort of season where B1G teams get ~2 teams with 3,4,5 seeds (Wisconsin and Purdue, Md making a case), then 4-5 teams that are in those 7,8,9,10 (and 11) first round matchups.I would not go near arguing that the Big Ten is the best conference. ACC.
I think many here feel, I believe rightly, that the conference is good - contrary to what the conventional wisdom often seems to be - that a conference is good with a few elite team ("who cares about the rest") and isn't any good if they don't have a few elite teams at the very top.
I said the rest of the teams. As Smithee says. we don't have the elite teams we generally do as many are rebuilding. But Frosh become Sophs and next year the conference with be back up near the top.But overall top to bottom more competitive than it has been in a long time. Almost any team can beat any other on any given night. In the past that has generally not been true. So I would say the conference very strong but not elite. And I am not saying they are better than the ACC as currently we do not have the elite teams. And 10 out of 14 in top 65 is pretty darn good. Means no easy wins.As competitive as ever, yes. As strong as ever, I would say no. Think it's about in the middle relative to history.
I think there are 10 B1G teams in the top 65 of Ken Pom, which sounds good... until you realize there are 11 ACC teams in the top 50 (out of 15 total). And they have 7 in the top 30, the B1G has 3. But because of the depth of the middle of the conference we should have 6-7 teams that make it into the tournament still.
And we also barely lost to Notre Dame, which is currently in first place in the ACC. Your point?No question about it. The ACC is top to bottom the best conference.
FWIW, Wake is currently in last place and NU struggled to beat the Deacs.