Supposedly. Until it did not agree with his viewpointI disputed your description of how Virginia plays. Wasn’t that what your post was about?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Supposedly. Until it did not agree with his viewpointI disputed your description of how Virginia plays. Wasn’t that what your post was about?
It had nothing to do with the meaning of the post, "Heads are going to explode" in particular should have been a clue- I think Evanston Cat Or Virginia Cat would have been the likely casualtiesSupposedly. Until it did not agree with his viewpoint
Here's a hint. Do you remember another coach that slowed down the game, ran a disciplined offense, relied on 3's, retreated after shooting, used a unique defense , all out of necessity to counteract superior talent
Bennett actually recruits talent. Pretty large difference. Other coach can't get enough talent to be competitive in the Patriot League.
It can't be possible that you're still a Carmody hugger, can it?At least you recognized the irony of Corbi's original post and my response. Corbi just wanted to criticize me rather than recognize the rather obvious meaning of the post that he was advocating a style of play not too dissimilar to CC's predecessor , which I agree could be a style that could make NU more competitive considering the usual talent deficiencies that NU faces
which I agree could be a style that could make NU more competitive considering the usual talent deficiencies that NU faces
It can't be possible that you're still a Carmody hugger, can it?
At least you recognized the irony of Corbi's original post and my response. Corbi just wanted to criticize me rather than recognize the rather obvious meaning of the post that he was advocating a style of play not too dissimilar to CC's predecessor , which I agree could be a style that could make NU more competitive considering the usual talent deficiencies that NU faces
BC could run circles around CC with regards to X's and O's
I think CC would have scored more than 40 against Wheaton.
You are assuming NU had superior talent. Anyone that followed NU and thought the talent level was anywhere near B1G standards was delusional. The talent deficit may have been BC's fault but NU scoring 40 against anyone should not have surprised anyone. Hell ,UMBC beat UVA last year so any team is capable of laying an egg. A winning % of 31% with NU's talent in all honesty was extraordinary-acceptable no, but relative to talent level-remarkable
The difference is that Bennett teaches defense first and is built on defense.I don't care about your opinion on UVA's 3 point strategy-the post had almost nothing to do about that so I would suggest you read it again and then think about what you were proposing
The difference is that Bennett teaches defense first and is built on defense.
Defense was an afterthought under Collins’ predecessor.
The difference is that Bennett teaches defense first and is built on defense.
Defense was an afterthought under Collins’ predecessor.
Your trolling was along the lines of “hahaha UVA plays like the Carmody Cats.” Clearly you are not actually dumb enough to think that’s the case. This is good.NU could not play man to man in the past because of talent issues. NU had to resort to gimmick defenses to survive. There is no way NU could have played the pack line D then or now. Pardon was the only player on this years team that could double and recover.
Your trolling was along the lines of “hahaha UVA plus like the Carmody Cats.” Clearly you are not actually dumb enough to think that’s the case. This is good.
The point is that UVA is decidedly defense-first. Bennett’s core philosophy is nothing like Carmody’s core philosophy.I must be that dumb since I don't understand your post.
My response to Corbi's original post was that he was advocating many of the principles that BC was forced to use while here. I thought that would lead to a boisterous response fron VaC, Willycat et al. Somehow that was turned into a debate on the specifics of UVA's offense by Corbi
I am not advocating a return to BC but just the realistic evaluation of NU's performance relative to their talent level during BC's tenure. Anyone that thinks BC was not a miracle worker with his teams is not being honest. The talent level at NU should have resulted in 0-16 almost every year. I would guess that NU was picked to finish last by the experts almost every year and in all honesty that would have been a very real appraisal of NU's talent
Really? When was a 1-3-1 defense considered a gimmick?NU could not play man to man in the past because of talent issues. NU had to resort to gimmick defenses to survive. There is no way NU could have played the pack line D then or now. Pardon was the only player on this years team that could double and recover.
Was Carmody "forced" to run the P offense and "forced" to not rebound?I must be that dumb since I don't understand your post.
My response to Corbi's original post was that he was advocating many of the principles that BC was forced to use while here. I thought that would lead to a boisterous response fron VaC, Willycat et al. Somehow that was turned into a debate on the specifics of UVA's offense by Corbi
I am not advocating a return to BC but just the realistic evaluation of NU's performance relative to their talent level during BC's tenure. Anyone that thinks BC was not a miracle worker with his teams is not being honest. The talent level at NU should have resulted in 0-16 almost every year. I would guess that NU was picked to finish last by the experts almost every year and in all honesty that would have been a very real appraisal of NU's talent
I must be that dumb since I don't understand your post.
My response to Corbi's original post was that he was advocating many of the principles that BC was forced to use while here. I thought that would lead to a boisterous response fron VaC, Willycat et al. Somehow that was turned into a debate on the specifics of UVA's offense by Corbi
I am not advocating a return to BC but just the realistic evaluation of NU's performance relative to their talent level during BC's tenure. Anyone that thinks BC was not a miracle worker with his teams is not being honest. The talent level at NU should have resulted in 0-16 almost every year. I would guess that NU was picked to finish last by the experts almost every year and in all honesty that would have been a very real appraisal of NU's talent
Was Carmody "forced" to run the P offense and "forced" to not rebound?
Really? When was a 1-3-1 defense considered a gimmick?
The point is that UVA is decidedly defense-first. Bennett’s core philosophy is nothing like Carmody’s core philosophy.
Pointing out that a coach wants to control tempo and believes in shooting three-pointers is basically pointing out that a coach’s profession is basketball coach - these are things that most basketball coaches wish to do.
So is you’re crapping on the players just to rep your bizarre infatuation for Carmody!? Regadless, you are wrong. He did have some real talent to work with. Shurna, Coble, Young, Thompson, Hearn just to name a few. Some of those guys played pro ball.
I don't have an infatuation with BC but I do believe he was a good x and o coach that maximized NU's chance of winning relative to the talent available to him. Every coach should strive for that goal.
You listed 5 players from the BC era but can you name any NU team that had 5 legitimate B1G starters with a few bench players to help out. Maybe there was a team like that but I can't recall one. I probably only saw a lot of NU games in the last 6-7 years of BC's career