ADVERTISEMENT

I would like to understand…

ricko654321

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2006
4,169
3,173
113
I would like to understand how jumping into, through with a knee, and almost on top of and nearly pancaking someone isn't a flagrant foul 1 at all, yet the 2 or 3 times we've gotten flagrant 2's this year are. Just curious.
 
Based on tonight, I can tell you unequivocally it is traveling.
The traveling call is dubious and perhaps technically correct depending on the timing of his foot placement, but there can still be a flagrant 1 for a dangerous play that was not close to making any impact on the ball or where the player was headed, no? Flagrant can obviously still happen after the play was theoretically paused even if an inadvertent whistle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baz=Heisman
It was such bullshit. The ref close to the play had a foul and that bozo 50 feet away from the play overruled him with a walk. How does that make any sense??
 
It was such bullshit. The ref close to the play had a foul and that bozo 50 feet away from the play overruled him with a walk. How does that make any sense??
It’s because the bozo was busy trying to save face because right before that he called it out on NU and one of the other refs with a better view overruled him. Possibly the worst make up call I’ve ever seen in any sporting event

Leach didn’t travel until the USC guy hit him with the “off the top rope” suplex WWF move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KittyLover24
The refs have been terribly biased against NU all season. I'm almost 70 years old and I have never seen a season like this in that regard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lunker35
The refs have been terribly biased against NU all season. I'm almost 70 years old and I have never seen a season like this in that regard.
We always get Larry Scirotto who is the absolute worst. He gets fired from his job as a police officer for being incompetent yet he keeps getting invited by the conference to #%*} up our games.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT