For whatever it's worth, I really do try to maintain a neutral position when gathering "facts" as they are told to us by the media and other sources, with the hope that my good sense can at least get a baseline of what few things all parties mutually agree on.
I think people agree that Tracy was brought to campus in a professional capacity and Mel Tucker grew fond of her. Tucker had very direct influence on the degree to which she was brought in for consulting, which placed her in a disadvantaged power dynamic as would be the case in any vendor/client relationship. Now, whether there was a consensual romantic relationship or not is obviously in dispute, but it's not hard to imagine where she was "overly" friendly by some standards looking to nurture a business relationship, and Tucker misread those signals. What seems to not be in dispute is that Tucker acted in a sexual manner that he insists was consensual, she insists wasn't, and the university insists was inappropriate regardless of consent, based on context and venue.
Objectively, the lesson here is not to pursue romantic or sexual interests where there is a professional dynamic in play, or you must do so knowing that your job and reputation are at risk. No one should really have to explain this to someone with one of the most lucrative contracts in the sport, but whatever...we're not exactly in a great position to throw stones over what a millionaire head coach should know or not.