ADVERTISEMENT

Moritz Wagner

Where does Wagner (Mortiz) rank in this year's NBA draft class, if he were to declare? Is he a top 5 given his rare stretch 4 talents?
Good question. He has nothing to gain by staying as far as the NBA is concerned, although he seems to like playing college ball and may well return. Some are saying MSU's Jaren Jackson is a first-five pick, and Mo is way better offensively at this point, so not crazy that Mo could be a lottery pick. Wherever he's picked he's going to be very wealthy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hungry Jack
Good question. He has nothing to gain by staying as far as the NBA is concerned, although he seems to like playing college ball and may well return. Some are saying MSU's Jaren Jackson is a first-five pick, and Mo is way better offensively at this point, so not crazy that Mo could be a lottery pick. Wherever he's picked he's going to be very wealthy.

Wagner's stats this year are about the same as Lauri Markkanen's during his one year at Arizona. Markkanen is a better 3-point shooter, but Wagner handles the ball just as well, if not better. Some NBA team is going to get a steal with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hungry Jack
Wagner's stats this year are about the same as Lauri Markkanen's during his one year at Arizona. Markkanen is a better 3-point shooter, but Wagner handles the ball just as well, if not better. Some NBA team is going to get a steal with him.
I would think he's more like a 2nd round pick, or maybe late 1st round at best. Though I also though Lauri went too early, and he's turned out alright thus far. I worry about defensive viability for both of them though. Also ability to penetrate against NBA defenses. Not sure he is strong enough either - in general Michigan seemed to get outmuscled by Nova yesterday.
 
I would think he's more like a 2nd round pick, or maybe late 1st round at best. Though I also though Lauri went too early, and he's turned out alright thus far. I worry about defensive viability for both of them though. Also ability to penetrate against NBA defenses. Not sure he is strong enough either - in general Michigan seemed to get outmuscled by Nova yesterday.
Lauri is a much better athlete than he appears. He is not especially fluid but he can move his feet on switches against smaller players and he will get stronger. And he has had some highlight dunks this year as well. I could be wrong but I don't think Wagner is nearly as athletic.
 
Wagner's stats this year are about the same as Lauri Markkanen's during his one year at Arizona. Markkanen is a better 3-point shooter, but Wagner handles the ball just as well, if not better. Some NBA team is going to get a steal with him.

Wagner is not as good an athlete or player as Markkanen but he is comparable. I see him as Markkanen light. Lauri should have been a top 3 pick last year but luckily for the bulls some teams slept on him. I see Wagner as a top 15, possibly top 10 pick this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOUNUII
Wagner is not as good an athlete or player as Markkanen but he is comparable. I see him as Markkanen light. Lauri should have been a top 3 pick last year but luckily for the bulls some teams slept on him. I see Wagner as a top 15, possibly top 10 pick this year.

I saw a few mock drafts that have him in the second round. Lauri is going to be good, but I’d rather get Wagner at No. 30 (or later) than Lauri at No. 7.
 
I saw a few mock drafts that have him in the second round. Lauri is going to be good, but I’d rather get Wagner at No. 30 (or later) than Lauri at No. 7.

Those mocks are stale. I think people realized in the tournament how improved he is over last year. He will go in the top 20. I don’t see the Bulls passing on him with their second first round pick which should be in the high teens or low 20s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOUNUII
Those mocks are stale. I think people realized in the tournament how improved he is over last year. He will go in the top 20. I don’t see the Bulls passing on him with their second first round pick which should be in the high teens or low 20s.
Eh I saw one that was literally updated after the championship and looked better than most in terms of the projected top 10 being up to date / accurate, and it still had him mid 2nd round. He may slip into the late 1st round, but it doesn't look like people view him as anything approaching a lottery pick.

Which I think is for the reasons above - strength, lateral quickness on D, general athleticism. But who knows.

I'm also curious to see where Brunson gets drafted. And it looks like Jaren Jackson will go top 5, Bridges top 10... this was not one of Izzo's best postseason coaching efforts.
 
And it looks like Jaren Jackson will go top 5, Bridges top 10... this was not one of Izzo's best postseason coaching efforts.
I don't get the love for either of these guys. Jackson in particular is WAY overrated. Athletes, but not really ballers.
 
I don't get the love for either of these guys. Jackson in particular is WAY overrated. Athletes, but not really ballers.

Jackson would be drafted completely on potential. Wagner is a classic stretch 4 in today’s NBA game. I am convinced he’ll go top 20 after he goes through the pre draft workouts. Whichever team drafts him will be happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJCat and GOUNUII
I don't get the love for either of these guys. Jackson in particular is WAY overrated. Athletes, but not really ballers.
Funny you'd say that, Fitz. I've been thinking the exact same thing about Jackson, whom I've seen going to the Bulls in a couple of mocks. I've seen nothing about him that screams "NBA star", but I figured that was just my untrained eye more than anything. So apparently I'm not the only one who doesn't get what the buzz is about with him. If he does go to the Bulls, here's hoping we're wrong.
 
Eh I saw one that was literally updated after the championship and looked better than most in terms of the projected top 10 being up to date / accurate, and it still had him mid 2nd round. He may slip into the late 1st round, but it doesn't look like people view him as anything approaching a lottery pick.

Which I think is for the reasons above - strength, lateral quickness on D, general athleticism. But who knows.

I'm also curious to see where Brunson gets drafted. And it looks like Jaren Jackson will go top 5, Bridges top 10... this was not one of Izzo's best postseason coaching efforts.
He has had a couple of those,
 
I saw a few mock drafts that have him in the second round. Lauri is going to be good, but I’d rather get Wagner at No. 30 (or later) than Lauri at No. 7.

I think Lauri will be be much better than Mo in the NBA. Just don’t know who he guards in the NBA. Look what Krutwig did to him. Imagine what Felieco would do to him!
 
I’m going to assume that is exactly what no one else was thinking.

Mo hasn’t been projected in the first round in any mock draft I have seen. I sure there might be some out there, but comparing Mo to Lauri isn’t much less far fetched than Felecio to Mo. just don’t see him being more than a NBA role player.
 
Mo hasn’t been projected in the first round in any mock draft I have seen. I sure there might be some out there, but comparing Mo to Lauri isn’t much less far fetched than Felecio to Mo. just don’t see him being more than a NBA role player.

Wagner is a stretch 4, not a center. He would struggle to guard a guy like Felicio but not as badly as a guy like felicio would struggle guarding him on the other end of the floor. The reality is true post centers like a felicio or even a Much more talented Jahlil Okafor don’t play in today’s NBA. Wagner is a less athletic Markkanen. A Markennen lite and there definitely is room for players like that in today’s NBA. pretty much every Mock draft I’ve seen post NCAA tournament shows Wagner as a first round pick and I’ll stick to my prediction that he ends up being a top 20 pick.
 
Wagner is a stretch 4, not a center.
Mo seems to me to be like Kevin Love.

And Kevin Love is now playing Center for CLE. His ability to hit 3's outweighs any defensive liabilities against more traditional Centers. And his 3's are usually wide open because Centers don't have the quicks to get out to the 3 point line and guard him.
 
Mo seems to me to be like Kevin Love.

And Kevin Love is now playing Center for CLE. His ability to hit 3's outweighs any defensive liabilities against more traditional Centers. And his 3's are usually wide open because Centers don't have the quicks to get out to the 3 point line and guard him.

He may end up playing the 5 position at times in the NBA but that’s because true post players have gone the way of the dinousar in today’s NBA game. Most teams start two guards and three forwards or vice versa. Besides Embid and Cousins, are there any NBA regulars today that could have played the 5 in the days of the true post center (Ewing, Parrish, Shaq etc..)?
 
Last edited:
Mo seems to me to be like Kevin Love.

And Kevin Love is now playing Center for CLE. His ability to hit 3's outweighs any defensive liabilities against more traditional Centers. And his 3's are usually wide open because Centers don't have the quicks to get out to the 3 point line and guard him.
First Lauri Markanen, now Kevin Love, who is next Kevin McHale?

The mocks have him as high as 19 and as low as 48. I suspect someone will take a chance in the higher end, but I sure hope it isn’t the Bulls at their second pick in round one. Major defensive liability at that level.
 
First Lauri Markanen, now Kevin Love, who is next Kevin McHale?

The mocks have him as high as 19 and as low as 48. I suspect someone will take a chance in the higher end, but I sure hope it isn’t the Bulls at their second pick in round one. Major defensive liability at that level.

I don’t think he is as bad defensively as you contend but in a worst case scenario he is no more of a defensive liability than Trae Young. Where do you think Trae will be drafted?
 
Last edited:
I don’t think he is as bad defensively as you contend but in a worst case scenario he is no more of a defensive liability than Trae Young. Where do you think Trae will be drafted?
I don't think Mo is nearly as good offensively as Trae. Also, it's hard for me to tell whether Trae's defensive liability is a lack of effort thing (which it frequently looked like at OK, maybe because he was their entire offense on the other side) or a lack of ability thing (certainly his size and possibly durability is an issue). Neither one is good, but if it's the former maybe it's more fixable. But I think Trae has a bit of an attitude problem too which is an issue - which became apparent at times in the second half of their season when they were struggling.

I think Trae is likely to go in the 8-15 range maybe? The back half of the lottery sort of. But honestly I wouldn't really want the Bulls to take him with their pick either, I think he's limited and could create chemistry issues. Sexton seems like better in many of those regards as a PG, but the big issue there is he can't shoot. The best players in this draft seem to be all the rangy large wings and bigs.
 
Last edited:
I don't think Mo is nearly as good offensively as Trae. Also, it's hard for me to tell whether Trae's defensive liability is a lack of effort thing (which it frequently looked like at OK, maybe because he was their entire offense on the other side) or a lack of ability thing (certainly his size and possibly durability is an issue). Neither one is good, but if it's the latter maybe it's more fixable. But I think Trae has a bit of an attitude problem too which is an issue - which became apparent at times in the second half of their season when they were struggling.

I think Trae is likely to go in the 8-15 range maybe? The back half of the lottery sort of. But honestly I wouldn't really want the Bulls to take him with their pick either, I think he's limited and could create chemistry issues. Sexton seems like better in many of those regards as a PG, but the big issue there is he can't shoot. The best players in this draft seem to be all the rangy large wings and bigs.

I view Trae similarly. I hope the Bulls get into the top 6 and aren’t forced to take him but if not, I would still take Young over Sexton. Sexton can’t shoot consistently and the Bulls already have a guard (Dunn) who has that issue. I think Young is a better player and better fit for the Bulls than a guy like Sexton. As far as Wagner is concerned, he does not bring as much offensive upside as Young but in my opinion he is not as bad a defensive player/matchup in the NBA as some here claim. I see Young going in the back half of the Lottery and see Wagner going late teens/early 20s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ricko654321
I view Trae similarly. I hope the Bulls get into the top 6 and aren’t forced to take him but if not, I would still take Young over Sexton. Sexton can’t shoot consistently and the Bulls already have a guard (Dunn) who has that issue. I think Young is a better player and better fit for the Bulls than a guy like Sexton. As far as Wagner is concerned, he does not bring as much offensive upside as Young but in my opinion he is not as bad a defensive player/matchup in the NBA as some here claim. I see Young going in the back half of the Lottery and see Wagner going late teens/early 20s.
I see Young and Wagner going about where you project as well. I hope the Bulls get a better player than Young with the 7th pick and a better player than Wagner with their second pick. I think Young will be a good pro and will score like crazy. I think Wagner is an off the bench guy. I know you think otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ricko654321
I see Young and Wagner going about where you project as well. I hope the Bulls get a better player than Young with the 7th pick and a better player than Wagner with their second pick. I think Young will be a good pro and will score like crazy. I think Wagner is an off the bench guy. I know you think otherwise.

I view Wagner as a solid rotational contributor capable of getting a double double on most nights. Not sure if that is as a starter or off the bench. If you can get a guy like that with the 20th pick in the draft, then you are doing well.
 
I view Trae similarly. I hope the Bulls get into the top 6 and aren’t forced to take him but if not, I would still take Young over Sexton. Sexton can’t shoot consistently and the Bulls already have a guard (Dunn) who has that issue. I think Young is a better player and better fit for the Bulls than a guy like Sexton. As far as Wagner is concerned, he does not bring as much offensive upside as Young but in my opinion he is not as bad a defensive player/matchup in the NBA as some here claim. I see Young going in the back half of the Lottery and see Wagner going late teens/early 20s.
I realized by 'latter' I suggested that "lack of ability" on defense would be more fixable than "lack of effort"... I meant the opposite (have fixed now).

You make a good point on Young being a better fit alongside Dunn than Sexton. Honestly though I would prefer neither of them. I'm not fully a believer in Levine yet but I think we roll with him for now, I don't love the G options in this draft. Maybe Doncic if he fell but by all accounts he's gonna go top 3. Knox does have a ton of potential, he is a risk though. I'd rather get one of the talented rangy bigs to put alongside Lauri. Then fill in another G / SF with our Pelicans pick? Or whoever we think is best available. Too bad they ended up making the playoffs. It's hard to have much confidence in Garpax's scouting / drafting abilities based on their past experience.

I dunno, I've mentally written the Bulls off for the time being, hoping they come back after a successful rebuild but not expecting much.
 
I realized by 'latter' I suggested that "lack of ability" on defense would be more fixable than "lack of effort"... I meant the opposite (have fixed now).

You make a good point on Young being a better fit alongside Dunn than Sexton. Honestly though I would prefer neither of them. I'm not fully a believer in Levine yet but I think we roll with him for now, I don't love the G options in this draft. Maybe Doncic if he fell but by all accounts he's gonna go top 3. Knox does have a ton of potential, he is a risk though. I'd rather get one of the talented rangy bigs to put alongside Lauri. Then fill in another G / SF with our Pelicans pick? Or whoever we think is best available. Too bad they ended up making the playoffs. It's hard to have much confidence in Garpax's scouting / drafting abilities based on their past experience.

I dunno, I've mentally written the Bulls off for the time being, hoping they come back after a successful rebuild but not expecting much.

The Bulls have a chance. With a little luck in the draft and then take a chance by bringing Jabari Parker back home, they may have the makings of a contender. Lavine and Markannen are both all stars in the making.
 
The Bulls have a chance. With a little luck in the draft and then take a chance by bringing Jabari Parker back home, they may have the makings of a contender. Lavine and Markannen are both all stars in the making.
I think both are decent role players rather than multi-year all stars. Also, unfortunately in the modern super-team NBA you really need 2+ superstars rather than just a collection of good to very good players (unless you are coached by Gregg Poppovich). But hey, I'd be happy to be wrong, I guess time will tell.
 
I think both are decent role players rather than multi-year all stars. Also, unfortunately in the modern super-team NBA you really need 2+ superstars rather than just a collection of good to very good players (unless you are coached by Gregg Poppovich). But hey, I'd be happy to be wrong, I guess time will tell.

Decent role players? Wow, could not disagree more, especially on Markannen. Do you realize that very few players in Bulls history have put up the type of numbers he has as a rookie.
 
Decent role players? Wow, could not disagree more, especially on Markannen. Do you realize that very few players in Bulls history have put up the type of numbers he has as a rookie.

Markannen is going to be pretty good. But he needs help and there may not be more than one or two keepers on the current roster.
 
Markannen is going to be pretty good. But he needs help and there may not be more than one or two keepers on the current roster.

I see Markannen and Lavine as high level starters, Dunn as an average starter and Portis/Nwaba as solid bench contributors. The rest of the roster is garbage. If they can land Jabari Parker (a risk worth taking) and get lucky with a top 5 player in this draft, then I think they’ve got a shot to be a contender in the East.
 
Decent role players? Wow, could not disagree more, especially on Markannen. Do you realize that very few players in Bulls history have put up the type of numbers he has as a rookie.
Markkanen has worse defensive stats than all the other notable bigs on our roster- RoLo, Portis, Felicio. He is useful on offense, but you need two-way players in the modern NBA. He could get somewhat better on D but given his natural abilities or lack thereof in some areas (quickness and strength) I think he will be a useful role player - a starter but not a star.

Also, in terms of offensive numbers, he's putting up 15 ppg, 7.5 rebs, 1 asst in 30 mpg. While shooting 43% from the field and 36% from 3 pt, taking 13 FGA per game, which isn't very good efficiency, especially for a big guy. Easy with the "very few players in Bulls history", those numbers are certainly respectable for a rookie and clearly show potential but are nothing special given that volume of play and shooting opportunity.
 
He's got better numbers than Kevin Garnett's first year in the league, on a similarly crappy team.

He also reached 100 3 pointers faster than any player in NBA history.

He was much better on D his rookie season than I though possible. You want to talk bad defense on the Bulls....Denzell.
 
He's got better numbers than Kevin Garnett's first year in the league, on a similarly crappy team.

He also reached 100 3 pointers faster than any player in NBA history.

He was much better on D his rookie season than I though possible. You want to talk bad defense on the Bulls....Denzell.
I think you guys are making the mistake of substituting offensive numbers for value to a team. Look at something like BPM instead, it is far from perfect but at least it considers both sides of the ball. Garnett was a gangly HS grad (yes Lauri isn't much older), and his value in his early years was on the defensive side of the floor. He gradually developed his offensive game over a number of years. If Lauri can develop his defensive abilities in the same way that KG developed his offense, then yes he will be a star. I don't see it happening though. But I doubt I will convince you, so fair enough.

Fans of bad teams often have a way of rationalizing how close they are to being a contender (reference- the Bears for many many years, though there I actually think we finally may be getting close!).
 
My recollection of Garnett was that he played like a rookie his first year, albeit a 19 year old rookie, and made the leap year two into a solid NBA player with a 7-9 ppg jump.

The point of my post was more in the "we don't know" camp than it's now an absolute he'll be a star, or a bench player. But I'd point a big red arrow to the fact that he did what he did his first year at the age of 19-20. Amongst an oftentimes clueless group of guys (and coach) on the floor. Truly clueless.

If I had to bet money, I'd bet he's going to be a solid NBA player -- a starter -- for 10+ years.

Rick, I'd disagree with you on two points. The first is shooting opportunity. This Bulls team killed Lauri. Repeatedly clueless on offense. As they bring in NBA players and get rid of the chaff his offensive efficiency will go up, if not his scoring. On defense, I echo'd what you write about strength and quickness nine months ago and I was wrong. He's got enough of both, will get stronger, and will get better defensively.

Again, he's 20 on a really shitty team.
 
I think you guys are making the mistake of substituting offensive numbers for value to a team. Look at something like BPM instead, it is far from perfect but at least it considers both sides of the ball. Garnett was a gangly HS grad (yes Lauri isn't much older), and his value in his early years was on the defensive side of the floor. He gradually developed his offensive game over a number of years. If Lauri can develop his defensive abilities in the same way that KG developed his offense, then yes he will be a star. I don't see it happening though. But I doubt I will convince you, so fair enough.

Fans of bad teams often have a way of rationalizing how close they are to being a contender (reference- the Bears for many many years, though there I actually think we finally may be getting close!).

How closely have you watched Markannen this year? Lauri is a much better athlete than what you are giving him credit for. He is much quicker than what anybody thought and his frame is already showing the strength benefits of being under the watch of a strength and conditioning coach. He is also one of only 4 Bulls rookies to score at least 1000 points and get 500 or more rebounds in a season. The other three are Micheal Jordan, Elton Brand and David Greenwood.

As far as Garnett is concerned, he was not a very good defensive player either when he was young player. I watched him play multiple times as a senior in HS at Farragaut and he had no clue what good defense was then.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT