ADVERTISEMENT

My column: Explosive hazing allegations call Fitz, NU administration into question

The allegations date back to 2020. Riley Lees, who is now a graduate assistant, was a player at the time.

He is in a unique position as someone who was in the locker room as a player and now has visibility into the football office as a coach.

Yeah and he tweeted calling the Daily story a "hit piece" which is quite a position for an active member of the coaching staff to publicly stake out.
 
Yes, and it obviously isn't, especially now that we have multiple former staffers confirming its validity.
Confirming the validity of what? I am not disputing that something inappropriate happened here. What I am uncertain of is what exactly happened, whether it was systemic or isolated and whether the coaching staff turned a blind eye to it or even encouraged it as has been suggested. I need to hear and see the evidence before passing full judgement. An unpublished picture of some white board provided by the accuser without any further corroborated context is not going to cut it for me and it shouldn't for any NU fan who knows how many players lives Fitz has positively impacted through the years.
 
Confirming the validity of what? I am not disputing that something inappropriate happened here. What I am uncertain of is what exactly happened, whether it was systemic or isolated and whether the coaching staff turned a blind eye to it or even encouraged it as has been suggested. I need to hear and see the evidence before passing full judgement.

We've got the whistleblower providing what they claim is photographic evidence and we have journalists like Lou getting confirmation of the "running" and the "car washes" from multiple former staffers. Regardless of what you need to see and hear, it's beyond clear that the Daily story was worth running and not just a hit piece.
 
We've got the whistleblower providing what they claim is photographic evidence and we have journalists like Lou getting confirmation of the "running" and the "car washes" from multiple former staffers. Regardless of what you need to see and hear, it's beyond clear that the Daily story was worth running and not just a hit piece.
Like I said, let's see the photographic evidence. The way it has been described so far leaves a lot to be desired. Not publicly released and described as a "photo of a white board that the accuser says was in the NU locker room". Sorry but I am going to need a lot more than that to find this whiteboard part of this credible.

Also, don't be surprised if more info about the accuser comes out in the next couple of days. If past incidents are any indication, It's not going to be too hard to figure out who this is and at that point we may have a better sense for motivation/credibility issues.

I'll cite the recent Matt Araiza incident as a cautionary tale. A college punter from San Diego State drafted by the Bills who was cut after the Bills/NFL conducted what they described as a thorough investigation into the allegations by a then 17 year old girl who said Araiza and two other teammates raped her at a college party. The kid's career and reputation were probably irreparably ruined after it was determined that he was not even in at the party at the time the alleged rape took place. If an investigation conducted by the NFL got it wrong, I am not going to take the findings of the NU newspaper as gospel.
 
Last edited:
You should too, especially considering you don't find the letter released by the team as something that was credibly signed by every player on the team (I agree by the way). Your evidentiary standards should apply both ways if you are a truly impartial observer to this situation.
 
Like I said, let's see the photographic evidence. The way it has been described so far leaves a lot to be desired. Not publicly released and described as a "photo of a white board that the accuser says was in the NU locker room". Sorry but I am going to need a lot more than that to find this whiteboard part of this credible.

Also, don't be surprised if more info about the accuser comes out in the next couple of days. If past incidents are any indication, It's not going to be too hard to figure out who this is and at that point we may have a better sense for motivation/credibility issues.

I'll cite the recent Matt Araiza incident as a cautionary tale. A college punter from San Diego State drafted by the Bills who was cut after the Bills/NFL conducted what they described as a thorough investigation into the allegations by a then 17 year old girl who said Araiza and two other teammates raped her at a college party. The kid's career and reputation were probably irreparably ruined after it was determined that he was not even in at the party at the time the alleged rape took place. If an investigation conducted by the NFL got it wrong, I am not going to take the findings of the NU newspaper as gospel.
The report will be released eventually (I think sooner than later). Names will be redacted but there should be specific dates, locations, and people involved (redacted). If there was a white board, it would be in the report. All of it will come out eventually.
 
Have you ever considered that it could be just that?
mel gibson film GIF
 
I completely disagree.

If the daily story is 100% accurate the university’s reputation would be severely damaged. No place like Northwestern takes a chance and manipulates a law firm to hide or cover up facts.
Well, they are using architectural firms and so-called experts to publish incomplete and misleading information about about the sound and parking logistics of the new, proposed stadium and concerts. Don’t be naive. You run an investigation as part of a crisis management plan.
 
How does it feel? This incident has finally enabled you to come out of the closet. Is it liberating for you to show your Fitz hatred out in the open for everyone to see?
How does this feel? It feels terrible. I bleed purple and personally like Fitz. In another thread, I described this as a nightmare.

Going 0-12 wouldn’t feel as bad as this.

But there are consequences for our actions, or lack thereof. Depending on what happens, this could spell the end of Fitz’s tenure.

You are a delusional person, so I’m not surprised that you subscribe to conspiracy theories.
 
First of all...just...wow.

Here's how I'm seeing things:

* The firm produced a report that we may never see that included interviews/statements by the Daily's anonymous source. So the Daily and the firm are basically working with the same information, but may choose to interpret and report it differently for obvious reasons.

* It is clear the source believes that Fitz knew something was going on. For whatever this is worth, I believe it's possible Fitz may not have known the gory details of what was happening in the showers, but if that is the case there is almost definitely willful ignorance in the most generous sense of that term. The firm could not conclude with *certainty* that he knew (i.e. he wasn't present, never discussed it), and thus, if you can't legally prove it, you legally move forward with that in mind.

* Most of us non-lawyer types are governed more by common sense, and I think even Fitz's fiercest defenders would agree the head coach of a program for nearly 20 years either has control, or he doesn't...so is it better to be an idiot or a liar?

* The existence of the "Runsgiving" whiteboard is pretty damning, but I'd love to hear a sound, logical explanation for it.

* Schill's response here is interesting. I have no reason to believe any new information has come out since he reviewed the report. So he either literally didn't bother reading the report, or he's basically getting caught with his pants down here grossly under-reacting to the report, never expecting the contents to be revealed by some junior Medill students.
Schill is a joke. He is a very weak, very new president who was only hired after the original selection fell gravely ill. Clearly he is being swayed by public opinion. Fitz has lots of defenders, including the university’s largest donor, Pat Ryan. If Morty was still president, Fitz would be gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zanycat
How does this feel? It feels terrible. I bleed purple and personally like Fitz. In another thread, I described this as a nightmare.

Going 0-12 wouldn’t feel as bad as this.

But there are consequences for our actions, or lack thereof. Depending on what happens, this could spell the end of Fitz’s tenure.

You are a delusional person, so I’m not surprised that you subscribe to conspiracy theories.
I don’t hate Fitz. I like him and loved the success he’s brought to the field until the last couple years. I bleed purple and wish him nothing but the best, but this type of sexual hazing crosses a line that should be unacceptable at any school, but especially NU. He’s done amazing work given NU’s unique challenges with recruiting, plus we’ve led D1 with academic all americas. That’s pretty impressive. Still, this lack of institutional control is unacceptable and he needs to be gone.
 
Something is amiss

The investigation was done by a reputable law firm. They spoke to everyone.

The daily writes a story.

If the law firm is accurate the situation is over with.

If the daily story is in anyway different or has new information that the lawyers did now. Fitz won’t coach again.


This doesn’t smell right.

Probably the Daily Northwestern reporting an exaggerated or distorted story as the straight truth. Seen that done before by them.
 
Wouldn’t it stand to reason if you endured this humiliation as a freshman that you would leave the program. I know if I had I would leave. The timing would take some thought. I don’t know how many true freshmen left during the year. However the transfer portal indicates two in the past couple of years. I can’t say they were or were not affected or whether even knowledge of this provided them with reason to leave.
 
Wouldn’t it stand to reason if you endured this humiliation as a freshman that you would leave the program. I know if I had I would leave. The timing would take some thought. I don’t know how many true freshmen left during the year. However the transfer portal indicates two in the past couple of years. I can’t say they were or were not affected or whether even knowledge of this provided them with reason to leave.
You would but that’s not the case here. Reach your own conclusions.
 
First of all...just...wow.

Here's how I'm seeing things:

* The existence of the "Runsgiving" whiteboard is pretty damning, but I'd love to hear a sound, logical explanation for it.

Well, it's endorsed by the NU Football Leadership council.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alaskawildkat
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT