ADVERTISEMENT

NBA Mock Draft

These things are dumb, but they have Brooks going at #59 to my Cleveland Cavaliers......

His best path if he plays in US (drafted or not) will be to have a good showing at Las Vegas Summer League and get a two-way deal. He would get g-league experience and be able to play up to 50 games in NBA. And it makes just short of $600k. Next best route is getting an exhibit 10 deal which basically is a non-guaranteed deal to be on a preseason NBA roster. They usually are immediately cut but the player gets a $75k bonus to play for their g-league team. Frequently, a good showing in g-league leads to a two-way spot. This is the route Buie took and it eventually led to a two-way deal with Knicks. Non-US is an option to especially for more money in the near term. Former Illini C Kofi Cockburn went (after a disastrous summer league) this route to Japan and now Korea. He makes good money and puts monster numbers against smaller and less skilled competition.
 
His best path if he plays in US (drafted or not) will be to have a good showing at Las Vegas Summer League and get a two-way deal. He would get g-league experience and be able to play up to 50 games in NBA. And it makes just short of $600k. Next best route is getting an exhibit 10 deal which basically is a non-guaranteed deal to be on a preseason NBA roster. They usually are immediately cut but the player gets a $75k bonus to play for their g-league team. Frequently, a good showing in g-league leads to a two-way spot. This is the route Buie took and it eventually led to a two-way deal with Knicks. Non-US is an option to especially for more money in the near term. Former Illini C Kofi Cockburn went (after a disastrous summer league) this route to Japan and now Korea. He makes good money and puts monster numbers against smaller and less skilled competition.
Barney can make the league. He has more talent than Spencer.
 
Spencer ultimately has more upside; better athlete.
I loved Spencer but I don’t understand this take at all. It’s not the Decathlon, it’s basketball. Spencer is the best LaCrosse player in the league, but he isn’t even in the top half of athletes in the NBA. Spencer is a smart player, but Barney’s Basketball IQ is off the charts. That matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NUCat320
I loved Spencer but I don’t understand this take at all. It’s not the Decathlon, it’s basketball. Spencer is the best LaCrosse player in the league, but he isn’t even in the top half of athletes in the NBA. Spencer is a smart player, but Barney’s Basketball IQ is off the charts. That matters.
And where is Barney in the NBA athlete ranking - near the bottom. His IQ is great, and it matters to some extent, but it’s much less appreciated and valued in the NBA than in college. And his 3-point shooting is the worst part of his game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hdhntr1
SGA is pretty nasty in the midrange, but generally yes, the 3 point shot has really screwed up the game
By "pretty nasty" you mean pretty much unstoppable in the midrange and driving to the basket, and well on his way to winning the MVP. What a bore.

Last year's MVP is a center who shoots fewer than four 3-pointers a game and yet may average a triple double for this entire season. Shrug.

And then there's Wemby, who shoots and makes three pointers from near midcourt and will probably record his first quadruple double within the next couple of years. Ho hum.

The NBA is so screwed up. Wretched. Where is the next Bill Laimbeer?
 
By "pretty nasty" you mean pretty much unstoppable in the midrange and driving to the basket, and well on his way to winning the MVP. What a bore.

Last year's MVP is a center who shoots fewer than four 3-pointers a game and yet may average a triple double for this entire season. Shrug.

And then there's Wemby, who shoots and makes three pointers from near midcourt and will probably record his first quadruple double within the next couple of years. Ho hum.

The NBA is so screwed up. Wretched. Where is the next Bill Laimbeer?
Have you watched a game? Not many are anymore. Because of the wretched amount of 3s…..!
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJCat
By "pretty nasty" you mean pretty much unstoppable in the midrange and driving to the basket, and well on his way to winning the MVP. What a bore.

Last year's MVP is a center who shoots fewer than four 3-pointers a game and yet may average a triple double for this entire season. Shrug.

And then there's Wemby, who shoots and makes three pointers from near midcourt and will probably record his first quadruple double within the next couple of years. Ho hum.

The NBA is so screwed up. Wretched. Where is the next Bill Laimbeer?
Does Nicholson have Laimbeer goon potential?
 
Troll much?
The closest person NU has probably ever had to a "Laimbeer" type was an early sixties cornerback named Fred Williamson who played in the very first Super Bowl. His nickhame was The Hammer because he laid guys out on crossing patterns for no reason at all. He eventually got concussed himself. After his career he became a prolific leading man in numerous Blaxploitation films.
 
Midrange shots are dumb and inefficient, so no, there isn't. And hasn't been for years.
In the aggregate, the stats may argue that, but situationally, there are times when a midrange game can be lethal such as when defenses keep trying to drop cover the high pick and roll.

I know the numbers show that because three points is more than two, you can tolerate a much lower three-point shooting percentage and still come out ahead. But as a fan, it is still miserable to watch teams miss 65-70% of their shots all game long. As a Celtics' fan, while it's hard to complain coming off an NBA title, it can be unbearable at times when they aren't making their 3's (as in this weird 3 week stretch they are in right now). The Celtics will pass up 3 foot shots to kick it back out for a three and then miss that 70% of the time (more like 75-80% these past few weeks).
 
Isn't the "step back 3" a traveling violation most of the time?
I mean, I see a lot of guys drive inside the arc, pick up the ball, step back left foot, step back right foot, then shoot.

If they re-located by hopping, the refs would (presumably?) (hopefully?) (occasionally?) call it.

Or am I still hallucinating.
 
In the aggregate, the stats may argue that, but situationally, there are times when a midrange game can be lethal such as when defenses keep trying to drop cover the high pick and roll.

I know the numbers show that because three points is more than two, you can tolerate a much lower three-point shooting percentage and still come out ahead. But as a fan, it is still miserable to watch teams miss 65-70% of their shots all game long. As a Celtics' fan, while it's hard to complain coming off an NBA title, it can be unbearable at times when they aren't making their 3's (as in this weird 3 week stretch they are in right now). The Celtics will pass up 3 foot shots to kick it back out for a three and then miss that 70% of the time (more like 75-80% these past few weeks).
What's the NBA equivalent of MLB banning the shift in response to baseball becoming dreadful to watch?
 
I loved Spencer but I don’t understand this take at all. It’s not the Decathlon, it’s basketball. Spencer is the best LaCrosse player in the league, but he isn’t even in the top half of athletes in the NBA. Spencer is a smart player, but Barney’s Basketball IQ is off the charts. That matters.
Spencer had more upside because he spent his time in another sport and then was still good enough to get to the league in basketball where now he can spend 100% of his time focusing on developing BB skills,. His skill set (more of a PG and better outside shot) is better fit in NBA. Barney has been spending his time in BB and has a better understanding of everything and likely barely makes it so hard to say he has much upside. He is more of a tweener,

Spencer has room to grow. He was away from BB for long enough that he has a lot of ways to get better, BB can make minor tweaks but it is not like he can suddenly get to another level
 
Last edited:
Spencer had more upside because he spent his time in another sport and then was still good enough to get to the league in basketball where now he can spend 100% of his time focusing on developing BB skills,. His skill set (more of a PG and better outside shot) is better fit in NBA. Barney has been spending his time in BB and has a better understanding of everything and likely barely makes it so hard to say he has much upside. He is more of a tweener,

Spencer has room to grow. He was away from BB for long enough that he has a lot of ways to get better, BB can make minor tweaks but it is not like he can suddenly get to another level
BB is a talented basketball player, but he is not terribly athletic and he is not a very good outside shooter. That pretty much dooms his chances for the NBA I'd think.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT