ADVERTISEMENT

NU vs EIU Game Thread

As an offensive threat, Big Matt is Ozymandia ("Look upon my hands, ye fans, and despair). But is defensive value is unassailable. I was a bit surprised that EIU's big Argentine guy got off a few shots on him, but Matt was a real presence on D. EIU's speed really flummoxed our perimeter defense, but the paint was well protected when Matt was in.

No real secret why the OT rotation was Matt, Mullins, Gelo, Mart and Leach. That was a defense-first lineup.
 
Does KenPom and the like distinguish between a 9-point win in OT vs. regulation? Genuinely don’t know.

Thought Cappy might respond about KenPom, because he didn't, so here's my take...

For Ken Pom (and Bart Torvik) an overtime game is essentially a game with more possessions. Ken Pom is all about points scored and allowed per possession. He determines "pace" by measuring possessions vs time played.

Just as a note of comparison, when I created my own ratings, one of many things I did was reduce the margin of victory by half if the game went into OT. If It went to double OT, I reduced the margin of victory by 75%. Clunky but realistic.

As for the impact of the game on our rating, the 9 point win is definitely better than a 1 point win. But if all the good teams in the Big Ten are beating Eastern Illinois by 30, it will still cost us maybe 5 spots in KenPom's ranking at tournament time.

Unless he has modified his method, a 1 point loss is basically the same as a 1 point win. (no giggling).
 
  • Like
Reactions: macarthur31
Not sure how some people gush about how great our coaching staff is "developing our bigs" and others put all the blame on the individual player for not being able to do some basic, fundamental things.

It can't be both.
It can.
 
Nick "struggled" because they collapsed around him when he got the ball in the paint. I think we will see this frequently in the future.
Getting Brooks back hopefully soon and having Ty getting his stroke back will help against that kind of D. Make the defense pay when they collapse like that will keep them honest. We missed quite a few 3's last night. Jalen knocking down some 3's will also give the opposing defense something to game plan about.
 
Weird game all around for Nicholson. There was a 5 minutes stretch when he looked like trash. But he played really well much of the game. Played the full overtime, I think.

Not sure how some people gush about how great our coaching staff is "developing our bigs" and others put all the blame on the individual player for not being able to do some basic, fundamental things.

It can't be both.
I believe it can, with the much larger responsibility on the player himself to develop his individual offensive game. A head coach’s / leader’s role is to put guys in position to succeed. An assistant’s is largely to fill in where the head coach cannot do everything. We can list all of these many duties and responsibilities they both have, but think it’s very far down on the list that they are teaching someone how to dribble, catch and/or shoot a ball better. Boo Buie developed into a great player by a long and hard road of individual physical, mental and technical self-improvement all within a series of schemes that he learned over time from his coaches.
 
Weird game all around for Nicholson. There was a 5 minutes stretch when he looked like trash. But he played really well much of the game. Played the full overtime, I think.

Not sure how some people gush about how great our coaching staff is "developing our bigs" and others put all the blame on the individual player for not being able to do some basic, fundamental things.

It can't be both.
If you look at where Nicholson started as a freshman compared to where he is now, that’s the definition of development. You can’t just teach "touch" around the basket at the college level. Touch is something that’s developed from a young age, with a little bit of natural ability mixed in. There’s only so much you can teach a player who doesn’t have that natural feel for finishing in tight spaces.

Now, if Nicholson had the ability to score in traffic like some players, trust me, they’d be using that every chance they get against competition like last night. But every player has limitations, and as a coach the job is to find ways to get the most out of players despite those limitations. And that's where I give Nicholson and the coaching staff credit. He's about as sound a player as he can be, considering what he has to work with. That’s a credit to both Matt and the staff. Matt has developed into a really solid player, and his improvement has been no accident.

He’s incredibly smart. He worked on his passing, on his spacing; he adapted his game to compensate for what he couldn’t do. On top of that, he’s the anchor defensively, which is the foundation for everything else NU does as a team. So, he’s been a huge part of the success.

Development in the end is mostly on the player. It’s the player's work, their mentality but, when you see repeated examples of players improving consistently, you can see that the coaches have created an environment where that development comes easy. And this staff, make no mistake, does a fantastic job of developing players.

TLDR: It can.
 
Weird game all around for Nicholson. There was a 5 minutes stretch when he looked like trash. But he played really well much of the game. Played the full overtime, I think.

Not sure how some people gush about how great our coaching staff is "developing our bigs" and others put all the blame on the individual player for not being able to do some basic, fundamental things.

It can't be both.
The explanation for that is Dererk Pardon. He turned out better than I think most anticipated, so the idea we are somehow great developing bigs was born.

Benson? Meh

Nance? Could not play big

Young? Got stapled to the bench

Nicholson?

That is not to say we are not competent at developing our bigs. But I don’t know that we are better or worse than with any other position.

Want a counter? The 🐐. Bam. We are great at developing guards.
 
The explanation for that is Dererk Pardon. He turned out better than I think most anticipated, so the idea we are somehow great developing bigs was born.

Benson? Meh

Nance? Could not play big

Young? Got stapled to the bench

Nicholson?

That is not to say we are not competent at developing our bigs. But I don’t know that we are better or worse than with any other position.

Want a counter? The 🐐. Bam. We are great at developing guards.
Nance and Young transferring to blue bloods certainly doesn’t hurt the argument that we can develop bigs.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT