ADVERTISEMENT

Opening Line Vs. Ball State

All I know is to take the under, whatever it is. We haven't even been close yet. I guess that's what happens when your defense gives up 16 total points in three games. Take the under.

Speaking of which, what'll the o/u be for next week's game against Minny? Gotta be like 25 or something. If it's anywhere near 40, I'm headed to Vegas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rmndcat
All I know is to take the under, whatever it is. We haven't even been close yet. I guess that's what happens when your defense gives up 16 total points in three games. Take the under.

Speaking of which, what'll the o/u be for next week's game against Minny? Gotta be like 25 or something. If it's anywhere near 40, I'm headed to Vegas.

I think NU beats Minny 2-0 as the defense sacks Leidner in the 4th quarter for the only points of the game, setting back college football over 100 years to the days of the flying wedge.......

Yes, play the under no matter how low the over/under line goes......
 
People considered last year's Michigan game to have set College Football back because the final score was 10-9. I don't remember much of it because it was so disgusting to watch I blocked it out but we seem to be much happier with the low-scoring games this year - maybe because we're winning? Or is it because the low scores are the result of great defense vs sloppy offense?
 
People considered last year's Michigan game to have set College Football back because the final score was 10-9. I don't remember much of it because it was so disgusting to watch I blocked it out but we seem to be much happier with the low-scoring games this year - maybe because we're winning? Or is it because the low scores are the result of great defense vs sloppy offense?
I was about to comment that football is already back to the 1910's following the NU Michigan game last year. Putting it back another 100 years would put it in the 1810s. That's pre-rugby.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT