ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Wow, what a mess at Stanford

1830sherman

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
442
566
93
And they don't even have an AD to clean it up. This might be just the job for Graggoyle.

from the Mercury News:

What hasn’t gone wrong for Stanford lately?

— The football program is coming off back-to-back 3-9 seasons under Taylor and faces a slew of challenges just to attain an acceptable level of mediocrity.

— The men’s basketball program, while led by a first-rate coach in Kyle Smith, hasn’t participated in the NCAA Tournament since March 2014.

— The women’s basketball program just experienced its worst season since 1987.

— The Cardinal’s new home, the ACC, is implementing a revenue distribution model that seemingly will make it more difficult for Stanford to compete in the major sports.

— The situation is no better financially, largely due to revenue woes. In the 2024 fiscal year, the Cardinal needed a $47 million subsidy from campus in order to balance their books, according to Stanford’s annual report.

— There is no athletic director, no interim athletic director and no timeline for naming a permanent athletic director.

— Meanwhile, president Jonathan Levin, who has been on the job since August, just implemented a hiring freeze and is undoubtedly preoccupied with the potential loss of hundreds of millions in federal funding.

(Regrets if this is paywalled)
 
And they don't even have an AD to clean it up. This might be just the job for Graggoyle.
1. You answered your own question. If they don't have an AD, then no one is sticking their neck out to sort it all. As a total outsider it wouldn't surprise me to see Luck inserted into the position, given his high profile (but if I'm him, I would just say no thanks).

2. Graggoyle...first time I ever heard that. Made me laugh.
 
Glad we avoided Taylor as football head coach. Remember his name being mentioned on this board as a potential Fitz replacement. He's been under multiple investigations for bullying employees and NCAA infractions. I couldn't help but chuckle at this damning quote in the ESPN article below: One of the sources who spoke with ESPN on condition of anonymity said that, while Taylor is an "equal opportunity a--hole," his behavior more often targeted women.

 
  • Wow
Reactions: mickbula
Maybe they (and Berkeley) would've been better off staying in the rebuilt Pac-12 conference.

College sports will be a healthier place when we reach an endgame of a football superconference (maybe with Premier League-style relegation and elevation?) and a return to regional conferences for everything else.
 
Wondering how the federal funding freeze will affect NU? If academic programs need to be slashed, what do we expect will happen to athletic programs?
 
Stanford used to be noted for their top athletics program across the board in terms of quality and quantity. Their athletics program was a real leader. Now that they have fallen on rough times program cutbacks will happen there and with programs across the country. Dire times ahead for all universities with research freezes and cutbacks coming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yeswecat
I have found the gross Federal contract amounts with select schools astonishing. Penn has $400 mil and Columbia has $100 mil in "contracts". Now I don't know whether these amounts represent annual revenue or are gross contract amounts with varying durations but still that's a chunk.
 
I have found the gross Federal contract amounts with select schools astonishing. Penn has $400 mil and Columbia has $100 mil in "contracts". Now I don't know whether these amounts represent annual revenue or are gross contract amounts with varying durations but still that's a chunk.
Johns Hopkins is out $800 million, from USAID funding. Laying off 2000 employees. NU's over $1 billion in Grant funding is almost all federal dollars.
 
And they don't even have an AD to clean it up. This might be just the job for Graggoyle.

from the Mercury News:

What hasn’t gone wrong for Stanford lately?

— The football program is coming off back-to-back 3-9 seasons under Taylor and faces a slew of challenges just to attain an acceptable level of mediocrity.

— The men’s basketball program, while led by a first-rate coach in Kyle Smith, hasn’t participated in the NCAA Tournament since March 2014.

— The women’s basketball program just experienced its worst season since 1987.

— The Cardinal’s new home, the ACC, is implementing a revenue distribution model that seemingly will make it more difficult for Stanford to compete in the major sports.

— The situation is no better financially, largely due to revenue woes. In the 2024 fiscal year, the Cardinal needed a $47 million subsidy from campus in order to balance their books, according to Stanford’s annual report.

— There is no athletic director, no interim athletic director and no timeline for naming a permanent athletic director.

— Meanwhile, president Jonathan Levin, who has been on the job since August, just implemented a hiring freeze and is undoubtedly preoccupied with the potential loss of hundreds of millions in federal funding.

(Regrets if this is paywalled)
When I learned the NU whistleblower hailed from a Cardinal family I wondered if there would be any karma repercussions.
 
Hadn't heard that number for NU. Really staggering as NU is not really strong in applied science. It doesn't have the labs that many major universities have. Johns Hopkins has the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and likely other major facilities I am unaware of. These facilities are fundamentally large US Government research facilities and their annual budgets are many multiples of millions.

I need to research how Hopkins tapped into the USAID pot. That agency was largely an operation to win hearts and minds for DOD and the intelligence community interests. Some food and medicines thrown in but not as much as thought.

PS Here's an article that will make your eyes pop. On Hopkin's Federal contracts. Turns out clinical trials are enormous business:

 
Last edited:
Most of NU's grant finding is in the medical school, which is where the big money is at most universities. Schools with med schools have big money, others not so much. NIH $$.
 
  • Like
Reactions: corbi296
Seems to me that Stanford’s pain is NU’s gain, at least in the short run. Geography will always be an issue in recruiting west coast athletes but with Stanford on its heels, NU should devote more resources to west coast recruiting. Until Stanford sorts out its problems, academically-oriented student athletes may say “no thanks” to the s-show in Palo Alto and say “I’m all in” to NU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cedricmelons
I am not interested in getting into a political discussion. My observations are more general, expressing surprise at the level of Federal funding of so many major universities. The Feds are as influential if not more so than the BOTs. If the Feds were to meaningfully cut funding, there will be a big time impact to employment.
 
Johns Hopkins is out $800 million, from USAID funding. Laying off 2000 employees. NU's over $1 billion in Grant funding is almost all federal
It’s dire times for universities esp research dependent of Federal grants. We are heading towards Dark Ages. Lots of cutting edge research to be lost which will not be easy to recover. Future generations researchers will be lost too.
 
It’s dire times for universities esp research dependent of Federal grants. We are heading towards Dark Ages. Lots of cutting edge research to be lost which will not be easy to recover. Future generations researchers will be lost too.
Hopefully it’s a temporary dark period.. Have to reverse course and come back to our senses in November 2027.
 
Hadn't heard that number for NU. Really staggering as NU is not really strong in applied science. It doesn't have the labs that many major universities have. Johns Hopkins has the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and likely other major facilities I am unaware of. These facilities are fundamentally large US Government research facilities and their annual budgets are many multiples of millions.

I need to research how Hopkins tapped into the USAID pot. That agency was largely an operation to win hearts and minds for DOD and the intelligence community interests. Some food and medicines thrown in but not as much as thought.

PS Here's an article that will make your eyes pop. On Hopkin's Federal contracts. Turns out clinical trials are enormous business:

I believe/suspect that John Hopkins does a lot of medical research in diseases that are more of an issue outside the US with USAID money.
 
I have found the gross Federal contract amounts with select schools astonishing. Penn has $400 mil and Columbia has $100 mil in "contracts". Now I don't know whether these amounts represent annual revenue or are gross contract amounts with varying durations but still that's a chunk.
I think it is more than that. Kept hearing that Columbia had $400 million on the chopping block.
 
Hadn't heard that number for NU. Really staggering as NU is not really strong in applied science. It doesn't have the labs that many major universities have. Johns Hopkins has the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and likely other major facilities I am unaware of. These facilities are fundamentally large US Government research facilities and their annual budgets are many multiples of millions.

I need to research how Hopkins tapped into the USAID pot. That agency was largely an operation to win hearts and minds for DOD and the intelligence community interests. Some food and medicines thrown in but not as much as thought.

PS Here's an article that will make your eyes pop. On Hopkin's Federal contracts. Turns out clinical trials are enormous business:

I thought JPL was an offshoot of Cal Tech
 
And they don't even have an AD to clean it up. This might be just the job for Graggoyle.

from the Mercury News:

What hasn’t gone wrong for Stanford lately?

— The football program is coming off back-to-back 3-9 seasons under Taylor and faces a slew of challenges just to attain an acceptable level of mediocrity.

— The men’s basketball program, while led by a first-rate coach in Kyle Smith, hasn’t participated in the NCAA Tournament since March 2014.

— The women’s basketball program just experienced its worst season since 1987.

— The Cardinal’s new home, the ACC, is implementing a revenue distribution model that seemingly will make it more difficult for Stanford to compete in the major sports.

— The situation is no better financially, largely due to revenue woes. In the 2024 fiscal year, the Cardinal needed a $47 million subsidy from campus in order to balance their books, according to Stanford’s annual report.

— There is no athletic director, no interim athletic director and no timeline for naming a permanent athletic director.

— Meanwhile, president Jonathan Levin, who has been on the job since August, just implemented a hiring freeze and is undoubtedly preoccupied with the potential loss of hundreds of millions in federal funding.

(Regrets if this is paywalled)
What it really boils down to is all those silicon valley billionaires stopped sending them money for their athletic programs and they have to stand more on their own, Maybe harder to justify when the PAC isn't their conference anymore and even if it was it is a shadow of it's former self
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT