ADVERTISEMENT

Please change up this lineup for the love of God

For the love of God why don't we just trust the coaching staff that has given us our only three NCAA appearances in our bball history?
They have the hand that they have and it is a roster that in order to win, they have to win ugly. New guys are developing nicely but not there yet and while Tye is back it is pretty apparent that he is missing something. My guess, half a step and some strength and conditioning which also have prevented him from getting in the thousands of practice shots he needs. We have a very thin margin for success.

Tye was an elite defender but I would guess that has slipped a bit with his loss of speed, strength and conditioning (as seen with the ticky tach fouls and foul trouble) and since on D they work so much together that one chink hurts us more than we know. And with him really inconsistent on his 3s, (Barhizer is as well likely from being in the boot for a long time. Just noticed less because of all the other parts of his game) it turns us into a 25-30% from 3 team (this year) rather than 30-35% (last year) and that makes it hard to win a lot of games. The young guys show promise but reality is they are not ready for a major role yet

CCC has the roster he has for this year. It has a very thin margin for success (getting us back to the promised land of NCAA tourney) Hopefully they can pull it together but that needs to start pretty quickly
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: macarthur31
The young guys show promise but reality is they are not ready for a major role yet
If thats the reality, then we are toast. (I disagree with your assessment)

Windham and Ciaravino are both better right now than Mullins, who is the first sub off the bench for 4 positions.
Both freshmen can create their own shot. We only have 2 other guys on the roster who can say that with confidence.
Windham and Ciaravino are both willing, athletic, inexperienced defenders.

For the time being it may be better to play Mullins when Hunger is on the court - to shore up the defense.
But I can't make a case for putting Mullins out there with Nicholson.
 
If thats the reality, then we are toast. (I disagree with your assessment)

Windham and Ciaravino are both better right now than Mullins, who is the first sub off the bench for 4 positions.
Both freshmen can create their own shot. We only have 2 other guys on the roster who can say that with confidence.
Windham and Ciaravino are both willing, athletic, inexperienced defenders.

For the time being it may be better to play Mullins when Hunger is on the court - to shore up the defense.
But I can't make a case for putting Mullins out there with Nicholson.

Leach is ahead of the freshmen right now when it comes to creating his own shot. It’s not just about the offensive moves. It’s also about what the defense has to prepare for. When you're a focal point of the defense's game plan, it’s that much harder to score. Leach, at this stage, is better equipped for that challenge.

The difference in terms of defensive impact between Mullins and the freshmen is more noticeable than the gap offensively. Now, let’s set the record straight on Mullins. This whole idea that he’s not quick enough is off base. He’s our most athletic guy, hands down. His length, his speed, his hops, his basketball IQ... it all makes him an elite defender. He’s not the flashiest scorer, but he’s a willing, smart passer. Yeah, he had a couple of lazy passes in the MSU game, but that happens. But when it comes to defense, Mullins is an elite. He creates turnovers, makes timely switches, communicates like a vet, and is second only to Barnhizer on the defensive end. That’s why he's getting major minutes, because he can lock it down defensively.

As for the freshmen, being willing on defense doesn’t mean you’re good on defense. They’ve got the tools, Windham especially can be really good down the road, but right now, they’re still making mistakes. Miscommunications, bad switches, getting bullied by stronger players, that’s normal for freshmen. But that’s also why freshmen typically aren’t relied on for heavy minutes early in their career. If you’re ranking them over Mullins, it tells me you're prioritizing shooting over defense and ball movement, and that’s not the whole picture.

Berry and Leach have a higher ceiling than anyone on the bench, but the problem is they don’t hit that ceiling often enough. That’s why the freshmen are getting more minutes, they’re showing flashes of something really good down the line. But if this team wants to get back to the tournament, it needs more out of Berry and Leach at that ceiling level. The freshmen aren't at that level yet, and that's fine, they shouldn’t be expected to be. They're not ready to consistently impact games without making mistakes that hurt us, especially on defense. They’ve got a lot of potential, but right now, that’s all it is at the moment potential. I am not saying that there won’t be a game or two where one of them will get red hot and make a huge impact on a game. I just don’t think they are ready to do that consistently yet.

Bottom line: we need more consistency from the upperclassmen if we're going to make a run. The freshmen can help, but they’re not the foundation yet. We should be expecting more out our seniors at this point. They need to step up.
 
Last edited:
Now, let’s set the record straight on Mullins. This whole idea that he’s not quick enough is off base. He’s our most athletic guy, hands down. His length, his speed, his hops
Yes. By far. Seeing him warm up love it stands out.

The problem is that he executes at pretty much the same speed. He does not change it up. All at the same speed. Makes him much easier to guard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThatkidfromHolland
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT