Aren’t you the participation trophy guy?Point being that no one is complaining that Clayton and Mullins have schollies. Also that Smith will be viewed better than both in the portal and we know Mullins got a schollie when he transferred.
So my point is that we may land another Langborg or another Mullins. Could get a VH or an Audige. No real way to know how the transfer will translate in B1G play. Smith is a known factor.
If Smith were to leave and we landed another Mullins, I, among others, would rightly complain this is a bad mark on the CCC record as he let talent escape so he could buy a lottery ticket.
So let me get this argument straight, the argument is our Freshman and Mullins stink, they are on Scholarship, Smith is better, he is not on Scholarship, so to make things “fair” Smith deserves a Scholarship?
Ever hear the term “throwing good money after bad”? Me thinks your personal experience of being considered a walk on at some programs back in the day is impacting your inconsistencies. Aren’t you the “ nice guys finish last” dude.
This is simple, you fill the spots with the 3 best players you can secure! If Smith is one of them, he gets the scholarship, if he isn’t he doesn’t. If he does not receive a scholarship and leaves for a better opportunity, we all thank him for his contributions and wish him luck. There is no culture conflict. Players want to play. Players that do play want to win! Please tell me you don’t dispute this last paragraph?