That’s a lot of projecting. It’s the reason why I said people are going out of their way to shit on him.
Nope. He’s 100% spot on.
That’s a lot of projecting. It’s the reason why I said people are going out of their way to shit on him.
Has he? I'm not sure I see that trend. Don't get me wrong, I'm not out on Lausch or pessimistic on him, but we've seen a pretty clear trend of pretty bad play vs good teams and strong play vs bad teams, so I'm not sure I see any kind of overall trend line within that, or any trend that correlates with time independent of the quality of opponent. I am hopeful we'll see some things in the remaining games to demonstrate that more tangibly.
I see you landing on an island with Wi-FI.And a chance to go bowling
It kills me that people can’t see the difference between Iowa’s OL and ours.That’s a lot of projecting. It’s the reason why I said people are going out of their way to shit on him.
Now you're starting to get it. Iowa is my least favorite team in the BIG after Ped State. It dates back to when I was in school many years ago. They were always the most obnoxious fans. If a guy transfers to Iowa, then he deserves all the crap he gets on this board.181 QB rating? 42 points? I’d say that’s a solid performance. Unless you’re a bitter old man holding a pointless grudge…
That may be more to do with the OL.Has he? I'm not sure I see that trend. Don't get me wrong, I'm not out on Lausch or pessimistic on him, but we've seen a pretty clear trend of pretty bad play vs good teams and strong play vs bad teams, so I'm not sure I see any kind of overall trend line within that, or any trend that correlates with time independent of the quality of opponent. I am hopeful we'll see some things in the remaining games to demonstrate that more tangibly.
I agree. I'm not down on him, I just dispute those trying to project improvement out of each of his ups and downs. It doesn't seem reasonable to me from what I've seen to assume the Purdue game means anything for the next three games given how we've seen him YoYo as his competition changes.That’s… basically what you’d expect from a QB who we know is still a developmental guy.
I don't disagree. The two hot topics on offense are Lausch and Lujan. Both deserve a lot of criticism, but both are only parts of the overall problem, and probably not even the biggest part in either case. The line, Porter's lack of health when he was out, the receievers... all problems at least as large as the big talkers.That may be more to do with the OL.
I live far from Iowa, but I still know talent when it’s obvious. Clark goes without saying. I’m only discussing Sully because it gets under the skin of the few you hate him for no apparent reason.It kills me that people can’t see the difference between Iowa’s OL and ours.
Between this and Caitlyn Clark, tell me you live in Iowa without telling me you live in Iowa.
And now you’re just like them. Congrats.Now you're starting to get it. Iowa is my least favorite team in the BIG after Ped State. It dates back to when I was in school many years ago. They were always the most obnoxious fans. If a guy transfers to Iowa, then he deserves all the crap he gets on this board.
I 1000% believe we beat Duke with Sullivan.A few Sullivan thoughts:
I don't think we'd be any better of a team with him as our #1 QB. I truly believe we'd still be a 4-5 team at this point.
He's a good fit for what Iowa is and what they are doing on offense this year. They have a pretty lousy receiving corps (yes, I wish Gill was still in purple, but he's arguably their best receiver, which is not a good thing) and actually don't have a great TE for once. But they do have a good offensive line and a solid running bak room, led by a really good RB. He's not asked to do too much passing the ball and the threat he brings running the ball makes their running game even better. It's really a nice fit for what they want to do offensively.
Iowa doesn't play any great defensive teams until at least their bowl game - they only have UCLA, Maryland and Nebraska left. He should still be able to operate like he has been and not be asked to do too much passing the ball for the rest of the year. He also won't have to play in any tough environments, so he's got a pretty nice situation ahead of him.
Multiple things can be true.
1) I'm okay with him moving on.
2) He is a QB that is limited in what he can bring to the table...
3) ...but he does make Iowa better compared to McNamara and any other option that they have. He's done a nice job for them.
We probably beat them with Lausch too thoughI 1000% believe we beat Duke with Sullivan.
Who knows? Maybe? 1000% is a lot of percent - like 900% more than the max. That feels like a lot. I think you're thinking about what Sullivan is now with the Iowa players and the Iowa system. He's really not that much different than what he was the last two years though. Not a bad QB, but not one that makes a big difference.I 1000% believe we beat Duke with Sullivan.
No Jim, I don’t hate Sully and never have. I just dispute the notion that we would be better with him. In fact, I didn’t see anything in that Wisconsin game that Lausch can’t do.I live far from Iowa, but I still know talent when it’s obvious. Clark goes without saying. I’m only discussing Sully because it gets under the skin of the few you hate him for no apparent reason.