I went thru 29 games that we played in our NCAA tournament season, 2016-17. We played 6 non-conference games against quality opponents, 18 conference games, 3 Big Ten tournament games, 2 NCAA tournament games. Here are the results.
The numbers, such as 1.052, are the ratio of pts scored / pts allowed for each two player combo. The numbers in bold are that same ratio for all the minutes played by each player. So when McIntosh played we outscored our opponents by 6%. When he was on the court with Lindsey, we outscored our opponents by 10.8%, etc. A performance rating of 1.0 is the league average.
I had always wondered why the team "fell apart" the next year. Only Taphorn and Lumpkin had graduated. That was about 10.5 points per game. Everybody else was back, with Anthony Gaines and Aaron Falzon stepping in to help. It seemed like we'd be pretty good in 2017-18... Not having a home court hurt somewhat, of course...
We had played 2016-17 with a 9 man "rotation", but the roles were fairly well-defined. Benson came off the bench for Pardon. Skelly primarily came in for Lumpkin. Brown would play (inadequately) for McIntosh or Lindsey. Taphorn mainly came in for Law or Lindsey. Ash didnt play often, but was clearly well below average for a Big Ten player. Other than Ash and Brown, the roster played at or above the Big Ten average.
We played well when Taphorn and Lindsey were on the court together.
When Benson entered games, the team did well if Lumpkin was playing too.
But when Benson was teamed with Skelly we played poorly.
In fact, our returning 5 man lineups (those that included neither Taphorn nor Lumpkin) had played less than 17% of the available minutes during the tournament season. We had been outscored 337-305 in about 193 minutes of game time. That was a bad sign.
Gaines and Falzon would need to play at or above the Big Ten average to replace Lumpkin and Taphorn...
% of mins | McIntosh | Law | Lumpkin | Pardon | Lindsey | Skelly | Brown | Taphorn | Benson | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
McIntosh | 86.6 | 1.060 | 1.062 | 1.065 | 1.028 | 1.108 | 1.078 | 1.009 | 1.069 | 1.081 |
Law | 82.6 | 1.062 | 1.039 | 1.050 | 1.002 | 1.081 | 1.048 | 0.998 | 1.054 | 1.017 |
Lumpkin | 69.9 | 1.065 | 1.050 | 1.035 | 0.978 | 1.069 | 1.081 | 0.958 | 0.951 | 1.204 |
Pardon | 67.6 | 1.028 | 1.002 | 0.978 | 1.002 | 1.017 | 1.016 | 0.967 | 1.024 | ------- |
Lindsey | 66.1 | 1.108 | 1.081 | 1.069 | 1.017 | 1.077 | 1.127 | 0.915 | 1.252 | 1.172 |
Skelly | 41.6 | 1.078 | 1.048 | 1.081 | 1.016 | 1.127 | 1.043 | 0.917 | 1.158 | 0.879 |
Brown | 33.5 | 1.009 | 0.998 | 0.958 | 0.967 | 0.915 | 0.917 | 0.960 | 0.982 | 0.910 |
Taphorn | 29.6 | 1.069 | 1.054 | 0.951 | 1.024 | 1.252 | 1.158 | 0.982 | 1.063 | 1.051 |
Benson | 16.1 | 1.081 | 1.017 | 1.204 | ------- | 1.172 | 0.879 | 0.910 | 1.051 | 1.027 |
Ash | 6.5 | .739 | 0.689 | 0.804 | 0.719 | 0.824 | 0.750 | 0.649 | 1.171 | 0.491 |
The numbers, such as 1.052, are the ratio of pts scored / pts allowed for each two player combo. The numbers in bold are that same ratio for all the minutes played by each player. So when McIntosh played we outscored our opponents by 6%. When he was on the court with Lindsey, we outscored our opponents by 10.8%, etc. A performance rating of 1.0 is the league average.
I had always wondered why the team "fell apart" the next year. Only Taphorn and Lumpkin had graduated. That was about 10.5 points per game. Everybody else was back, with Anthony Gaines and Aaron Falzon stepping in to help. It seemed like we'd be pretty good in 2017-18... Not having a home court hurt somewhat, of course...
We had played 2016-17 with a 9 man "rotation", but the roles were fairly well-defined. Benson came off the bench for Pardon. Skelly primarily came in for Lumpkin. Brown would play (inadequately) for McIntosh or Lindsey. Taphorn mainly came in for Law or Lindsey. Ash didnt play often, but was clearly well below average for a Big Ten player. Other than Ash and Brown, the roster played at or above the Big Ten average.
We played well when Taphorn and Lindsey were on the court together.
When Benson entered games, the team did well if Lumpkin was playing too.
But when Benson was teamed with Skelly we played poorly.
In fact, our returning 5 man lineups (those that included neither Taphorn nor Lumpkin) had played less than 17% of the available minutes during the tournament season. We had been outscored 337-305 in about 193 minutes of game time. That was a bad sign.
Gaines and Falzon would need to play at or above the Big Ten average to replace Lumpkin and Taphorn...