Why don't you just be straightforward about it and admit you don't like CC?
Because that would be untrue - but would explain your particular fetish with me. I think removing BC and bringing on CCC was the correct move. Absent an established coach like Shaka, who wasn't about to come to NU, CCC was a great choice. Blue blood lines with Duke as player and coach, having his old man around another bonus and a Chicago connection, to boot. He has come in and been much more open than PF - a man I have known dating back before his days at NU. I love the CCC hire, his recruiting success and his potential. But I don't think he is god-like, or perfect, or the best coach in bball history - maybe not even the best in NU history.
I'm not sold on his X's and O's. I think he waits too long to adapt - as evidence, two years in a row, he embraced man to man too long. I think he may have a bit of an ego problem and with the evidence so far, I think the Vassar thing is an example. And while he has taken recruiting to new levels, I am curious whether its him, or the story he sells. And if NU doesn't do something soon, that story will grow stale. Maybe CCC is simply a great recruiter - who knows...yet....
So, I truly am happy that CCC is the coach. While I have begun to question whether I like PF as HC - stubborn as he is, I have no question yet re CCC in that vein. I also find circle jerks not to my flavor. I rather discuss topics that may draw different opinions. So, talking about Vassar is interesting to me. Pondering different personnel choices, sets, strategies is intriguing. And when something happens that I predicted, I enjoy the warm feeling. And when it fails, then I have no problem being humbled.
Ignore is your friend. If you don't want to chat and cannot help yourself, put me on Ignore. Some of the greatest members of the board - mikey and shakes - have done so and all our lives are richer for it.