ADVERTISEMENT

Underwood

I don't buy that a technical alone makes that much of a swing. But I can see where a technical and a coach overplaying its impact might bring down a group.
It was really a 4 pt play as we got a 2 pt fg in that same possession aqnd it sort of changed the direction things were going
 
I don’t think he was overly critical in the postgame — I thought he was appropriately critical. ‘We have to learn to get a shot in situations where there’s not time to draw one up’ (which is, you know, just about always). That seems a fair assessment.

During the game was an embarrassment, just as a being a human. I have no idea why any recruit would choose that.
Success at getting guys to the pros
 
Agree on the opinion of him. And maybe he’s also got some technical coaching deficiencies? Loyola certainly exposed them a few years ago in the NCAAs.
His success has been based of pretty significant talent.
 
Agree on the opinion of him. And maybe he’s also got some technical coaching deficiencies? Loyola certainly exposed them a few years ago in the NCAAs.
He is used to winning with talent. Hard to say it is because of his coaching.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: flight 33
t was really a 4 pt play as we got a 2 pt fg in that same possession aqnd it sort of changed the direction things were going
We missed one of the two free throws and we DID NOT score a field goal in that possession so it really had little to no impact on the outcome.
 
We missed one of the two free throws and we DID NOT score a field goal in that possession so it really had little to no impact on the outcome.
Maybe what I was thinking as the T was classified as an intentional but I thought the called it a flagrant 1. That was more of what I thought was a turning point. It was two and the ball and it was a big swing
 
Not saying it was the case or not. And coaches play a big role in momentum changes. But often it just happens. Magic happens.
 
Actually, CC said post game that Verhoeven's only hoop of the game a couple minutes later, which was our first field goal in the second half, was a momentum shifter. Made the score 43-38, I think, and was the start of our 22-2 run.
When Verhoeven hits a jumper, it’s a pretty good omen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaCat
This is kind of his thing. He is who he is, and in fairness to him, it's a formula that has worked for him pretty much everywhere he has gone (though he still doesn't have a deep NCAA tourney run on his record). But there's no doubt that it's a fine line to walk and some players just won't respond to that well.

I, for the record, don't care for the guy. In my professional life (though obviously a very different type of setting), I never see the point of resorting to going off on someone for a mistake or an error. I just don't believe most people respond to that well no matter what the setting is, and I think the long-term effects of it are more negative than positive. Maybe that partially explains why his teams have never made deep tourney runs (who knows?).
While it might not be best for long term motivation, you have to remember that a game is done in 2 hrs so you can't really use techniques that take a while to develop. Have to think he uses different methods in different situations. But in a game when you need an immediate change those techniques you might want to use that give you warm fuzzies, are not going to get the job done
 
Believe it or not, he got a shout-out from the announcers for being abnormally composed tonight. Maybe it’s Franco’s night
 
He may be a good coach, but this guy is such a whiny drama queen.
BTN interviewed him on this. He basically went in, lit up his team for coming out flat for 90 seconds or so, then told them they needed to get each other psyched up or get blown out, then walked back out on the court and let them work it out. THey came out good in the second half so can't hate on him for it.
 
BTN interviewed him on this. He basically went in, lit up his team for coming out flat for 90 seconds or so, then told them they needed to get each other psyched up or get blown out, then walked back out on the court and let them work it out. THey came out good in the second half so can't hate on him for it.
He makes it about himself though. Go stand in the hallway or sit in an office. Coming out and just sitting on the bench alone is the dramatic “make it about me” way to handle it.
 
He makes it about himself though. Go stand in the hallway or sit in an office. Coming out and just sitting on the bench alone is the dramatic “make it about me” way to handle it.
Say what you want about Underwood - he's too much of a hardass, he's whiny, he makes it about himself, he criticizes his players - NW fans, Illini fans, whomever - like him or dislike him - over the last 4 seasons including this one, he has led his team to more conference wins than any other coach. Up to date beginning with the 2019/2020 season he has 51 wins. The next closest is Painter with 47. Some of his players can handle him and some can't. He wants to win and he wants guys who want to win, and he'll push them as hard as he can to get them to play hardnose defense, rebound, and limit turnovers. So personally, I don't care if he comes off as a hardass as long as he doesn't turn into Bob Knight.

Since this thread was started he has toned down the yelling during timeouts - give him credit for adjusting to his team. It didn't bother Ayo or Kofi or Frazier but apparently this team is a little more sensitive. But of course, let's listen to a NW fan call him whiny after it took their coach 11 years to figure out that it might make sense to play a little tougher on defense. The Wildcats are having a nice year so kudos to that coaching staff and players but I think you might want to reconsider going after a guy with 51 wins the last 4 conference seasons when your coach has 22. Beat UM tonight please.
 
Say what you want about Underwood - he's too much of a hardass, he's whiny, he makes it about himself, he criticizes his players - NW fans, Illini fans, whomever - like him or dislike him - over the last 4 seasons including this one, he has led his team to more conference wins than any other coach. Up to date beginning with the 2019/2020 season he has 51 wins. The next closest is Painter with 47. Some of his players can handle him and some can't. He wants to win and he wants guys who want to win, and he'll push them as hard as he can to get them to play hardnose defense, rebound, and limit turnovers. So personally, I don't care if he comes off as a hardass as long as he doesn't turn into Bob Knight.

Since this thread was started he has toned down the yelling during timeouts - give him credit for adjusting to his team. It didn't bother Ayo or Kofi or Frazier but apparently this team is a little more sensitive. But of course, let's listen to a NW fan call him whiny after it took their coach 11 years to figure out that it might make sense to play a little tougher on defense. The Wildcats are having a nice year so kudos to that coaching staff and players but I think you might want to reconsider going after a guy with 51 wins the last 4 conference seasons when your coach has 22. Beat UM tonight please.
No argument that he is a good coach. It's actually the first thing I said in my post from Tuesday night. He is a good coach. That said, in my opinion, he's one of those coaches that if things aren't going well, that act can get old REALLY fast. The best example I can think of is Ozzie Guillen. When the Sox were winning, everyone LOVED him. But as soon as the losing started, the act got weird and wasn't nearly as charming. It didn't take long for the White Sox to pull the plug.

Not saying Underwood is like Ozzie (they're actually pretty different), just making a comparison of those types of coaches. Illinois is playing good ball now and more in the direction of their potential (still not there yet based on the talent they have on the roster IMO). I think we'll have a very hard time beating them a second time in a couple of weeks and would be quite surprised if we left Champaign with a victory. But time will tell.
 
Say what you want about Underwood - he's too much of a hardass, he's whiny, he makes it about himself, he criticizes his players - NW fans, Illini fans, whomever - like him or dislike him - over the last 4 seasons including this one, he has led his team to more conference wins than any other coach. Up to date beginning with the 2019/2020 season he has 51 wins. The next closest is Painter with 47. Some of his players can handle him and some can't. He wants to win and he wants guys who want to win, and he'll push them as hard as he can to get them to play hardnose defense, rebound, and limit turnovers. So personally, I don't care if he comes off as a hardass as long as he doesn't turn into Bob Knight.

Since this thread was started he has toned down the yelling during timeouts - give him credit for adjusting to his team. It didn't bother Ayo or Kofi or Frazier but apparently this team is a little more sensitive. But of course, let's listen to a NW fan call him whiny after it took their coach 11 years to figure out that it might make sense to play a little tougher on defense. The Wildcats are having a nice year so kudos to that coaching staff and players but I think you might want to reconsider going after a guy with 51 wins the last 4 conference seasons when your coach has 22. Beat UM tonight please.
Collins has always been a defense first coach. The fundamentals of the scheme hasn’t changed. Added a couple of twists and have the veteran Jimmie’s and Joes to run it. It’s tougher to get the Jimmie’s and Joes when you have actual academic requirements.
 
No argument that he is a good coach. It's actually the first thing I said in my post from Tuesday night. He is a good coach. That said, in my opinion, he's one of those coaches that if things aren't going well, that act can get old REALLY fast. The best example I can think of is Ozzie Guillen. When the Sox were winning, everyone LOVED him. But as soon as the losing started, the act got weird and wasn't nearly as charming. It didn't take long for the White Sox to pull the plug.

Not saying Underwood is like Ozzie (they're actually pretty different), just making a comparison of those types of coaches. Illinois is playing good ball now and more in the direction of their potential (still not there yet based on the talent they have on the roster IMO). I think we'll have a very hard time beating them a second time in a couple of weeks and would be quite surprised if we left Champaign with a victory. But time will tell.
Are you a borger?

(Ozzie reference is a free opportunity to post my favorite Ozzie article ever.)


Fung is winning and winning is fung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonny2TheP
Collins has always been a defense first coach. The fundamentals of the scheme hasn’t changed. Added a couple of twists and have the veteran Jimmie’s and Joes to run it. It’s tougher to get the Jimmie’s and Joes when you have actual academic requirements.
We can say that, but the step up in effort this season is palpable. NU has no dreams of playing at an Iowa pace this season — that wasn’t necessarily the case the previous five years.
 
We can say that, but the step up in effort this season is palpable. NU has no dreams of playing at an Iowa pace this season — that wasn’t necessarily the case the previous five years.
Look at the switch and doubling efforts in the post between Law, Lindsey, Lumpkin and Pardon and tell me there’s a massive change in effort or scheme. Compared to last couple years there is a much needed emphasis on the defense end this year. Adding a defensive first assistant coach and having your two best players completely bought in to defense first is the culture shift back to that. Adding a true post defender makes the scheme work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewjin
Look at the switch and doubling efforts in the post between Law, Lindsey, Lumpkin and Pardon and tell me there’s a massive change in effort or scheme. Compared to last couple years there is a much needed emphasis on the defense end this year. Adding a defensive first assistant coach and having your two best players completely bought in to defense first is the culture shift back to that. Adding a true post defender makes the scheme work.
We agree. He came in defense first, he made the tournament and decided he could score 90 a game, he did not score 99 a game and lost a bunch, somebody came in and reminded him to coach defense first.

Hilariously, that interior presence has been on the roster, just never got to see the court.

Defense-first is all about emphasis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewjin
We agree. He came in defense first, he made the tournament and decided he could score 90 a game, he did not score 99 a game and lost a bunch, somebody came in and reminded him to coach defense first.

Hilariously, that interior presence has been on the roster, just never got to see the court.

Defense-first is all about emphasis.
Nicholson wasn’t near the player last season he is this season… ridiculous. Collins didn’t decide he could score 90 a game lol. He recruited the best talent he could get and they didn’t buy in and/or didn’t have the skill set required for lock down defense. Nance was/is an excellent defender for the 4 and a good help defender at the 5 poor post defender at the 5. Young was a poor defender at the 5. Kopp is a poor defender. Buie had to develop into a decent-good defender. The culture collapsed post tourney season. It has been rebuilt this season. Collins always emphasized defense. Beran who is an excellent defender played more than Young for that reason. Much to the gripe of the board.

I’m not defending Collins or condemning him but to say he wasn’t always a defense first coach is not accurate. Condem him for record and recruiting mistakes and letting his tourney team lose chemistry. We don’t need to make things up to criticize his coaching tenure. It’s been a rollercoaster.
 
Every time I see Underwood on TV during a game, it seems like he's yelling at his players. His ass is redder than a Wisconsin dairy barn.

I don't know about crossing a line as we don't know what he said to his players, but continuous negative reinforcement is not a sustainable coaching strategy.
Bumping this Hungry post.

I watched a bit of the Illinois-Kentucky game. Underwood might be the angriest basketball coach I’ve ever seen - Bobby Knight may be #2 on my list. 😡
 
Bumping this Hungry post.

I watched a bit of the Illinois-Kentucky game. Underwood might be the angriest basketball coach I’ve ever seen - Bobby Knight may be #2 on my list. 😡
Where is Izzo on your list? He seems to be often angry if generally having less to be angry about than almost every other B1G coach in conference history.
 
I have changed my opinion of him. He was very gracious in defeat after the OT win in December and the Chuck Person-inspired faux punt of the ball at the end of the game today was hilarious.
 
Bumping this Hungry post.

I watched a bit of the Illinois-Kentucky game. Underwood might be the angriest basketball coach I’ve ever seen - Bobby Knight may be #2 on my list. 😡
Yah but Bobby Knight won.

There is no doubt that Underwood is successful in bringing in great talent. Just doesn't seem that good at getting a lot out of them
 
Where is Izzo on your list? He seems to be often angry if generally having less to be angry about than almost every other B1G coach in conference history.
Izzo wears a scowl in games, but he is pretty well known for allowing his players to argue back with him and make their points during games.

Besides, don't most coaches rant and rave on the sidelines?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ricko654321
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT