I’m going top 10 all time but no higher. However, if this kept us out of the tourney this year… would have been top 3 for sure. Brutal.
Given the state of the team right now, this one doesn’t feel that bad to me.I’m going top 10 all time but no higher. However, if this kept us out of the tourney this year… would have been top 3 for sure. Brutal.
Oh come on. I knew this wasn't over at halftime. Nebraska is a veteran team on its way to the dance and we are down to playing two very inexperienced players at the most important position: point guard. They dug out of a big halftime hole at Washington a week ago and won with ease, I can think of dozens more games more heartbreaking than this one, but I feel bad for the team that left it all out there on the floor today. Going in, I thought this might be a blowout loss. I doubt this team can win another game this year, but they keep battling.I’m going top 10 all time but no higher. However, if this kept us out of the tourney this year… would have been top 3 for sure. Brutal.
Honestly don’t think this is even a top 3 tough loss this season. Iowa, Michigan, PSU all harder to take because we had the full squad and a lot more on the line at that point in the season. Sucks to lose a big lead but this game didn’t mean much in the long run and the team as currently constructed is unfortunately probably the worst in the league right now.I’m going top 10 all time but no higher. However, if this kept us out of the tourney this year… would have been top 3 for sure. Brutal.
You are up by 20 at home to a mediocre team. Good grief. Nebraska was on a roll of layups and dunks for a long time. Love Matt but he is no better than he was 2 years ago. Just part of the problem.Cmon we have a generic line up and bench. What do you expect?
Nicholson’s regression - or at least lack of progression - has been insanely disappointing. I thought that UCLA game in the R32 was going to springboard him forward. He’s just average at best. Sad.You are up by 20 at home to a mediocre team. Good grief. Nebraska was on a roll of layups and dunks for a long time. Love Matt but he is no better than he was 2 years ago. Just part of the problem.
It's terrible any way you slice itThe reason this doesn’t sting that badly is because winning or losing is pretty meaningless right now.
Was anything on the line this would have been quite the historical stinker.
Yes. Regardless of who is on the floor. We should be past this at this point. Simply unacceptable.We blew a 15 point halftime lead and a 41-21 lead with 19 minutes to play.
We gave up 47 points in the last 19 minutes.
Thats pretty hard to do at home.
Bad play, bad coaching.
But we're not past it because we had such bad recruiting classes prior to last year, so therefore no depth. You lose two of your top three and have no bench, you suddenly become a bad team. The key going forward is whether recruiting is becoming more consistent after the second wave of success. We'll see. The first class has some promise with KJ and Gelo, but no real studs. The second class looks interesting, but we'll know more next fall.Yes. Regardless of who is on the floor. We should be past this at this point. Simply unacceptable.
Is there a college team that would be viable after losing 2 of their best 3 players? I am thinking the answer is no. Take wolf and goldin off of Michigan, kj and Ivisic off of Illini, and Bailey and Harper off of Rutgers. See what happens. The injuries happened, you’re gonna lose. Perhaps an argument for depth can be made if you lose your 4th and 6th best player, but 2 of top 3, not much can be done.But we're not past it because we had such bad recruiting classes prior to last year, so therefore no depth. You lose two of your top three and have no bench, you suddenly become a bad team. The key going forward is whether recruiting is becoming more consistent after the second wave of success. We'll see. The first class has some promise with KJ and Gelo, but no real studs. The second class looks interesting, but we'll know more next fall.
Yeah, I agree with that. But still… you cannot blow an 18 point lead.Is there a college team that would be viable after losing 2 of their best 3 players? I am thinking the answer is no. Take wolf and goldin off of Michigan, kj and Ivisic off of Illini, and Bailey and Harper off of Rutgers. See what happens. The injuries happened, you’re gonna lose. Perhaps an argument for depth can be made if you lose your 4th and 6th best player, but 2 of top 3, not much can be done.
20 point lead, but I digress...Also, 12 other teams have blown bigger leads just this year alone! Hell, we're the 8th team this year to blow a 20 point lead. Texas A&M is a tourney team, they blew a 22 point lead at Texas and lost by 1 in regulation. No one tops Bucknell though, as they overcame a 21 point deficit in November to beat Richmond at home in double OT, and then blew a 20 point lead in January on the road at Lehigh to lose in OT!Yeah, I agree with that. But still… you cannot blow an 18 point lead.
Fair enoughIs there a college team that would be viable after losing 2 of their best 3 players? I am thinking the answer is no. Take wolf and goldin off of Michigan, kj and Ivisic off of Illini, and Bailey and Harper off of Rutgers. See what happens. The injuries happened, you’re gonna lose. Perhaps an argument for depth can be made if you lose your 4th and 6th best player, but 2 of top 3, not much can be done.
People are conflating "losing 2 of your starters" with "blowing a 20 point lead."Yeah, I agree with that. But still… you cannot blow an 18 point lead.
Yes. This is how I feel. There’s simply no excuse to blow an 18 point lead regardless of circumstances. Not to mention this is not pre-2017 or even pre-2022. Ty, Matt, Mart have all seen clutch wins (even in this miserable year!) and can’t let that happen. Man the F up and close the deal.People are conflating "losing 2 of your starters" with "blowing a 20 point lead."
You lose 2 of your starters - of course you're not as good...
But blowing a 20 point lead is choking.
Two halves to a game. Nebraska shot horribly in the first half and was not likely to do that all game. Anyone who knows NU knew we would blow our chances to keep them out of reach and we would let them back in the game. We lose leads all the time. It’s not choking. It’s playing the game.People are conflating "losing 2 of your starters" with "blowing a 20 point lead."
You lose 2 of your starters - of course you're not as good...
But blowing a 20 point lead is choking.
Good lord man, tone down the implications our players suck. It's old by now. Any group of players who blows a 20 pt lead without being choking is a terrible group. We are not good, but we are not terrible. Vegas only saw us as a 1.5 pts underdog.It’s not choking. It’s playing the game.
Please face reality that there are two halves to a game. No one said they suck. Stop your preaching to me, young fella.Good lord man, tone down the implications our players suck. It's old by now. Any group of players who blows a 20 pt lead without being choking is a terrible group. We are not good, but we are not terrible. Vegas only saw us as a 1.5 pts underdog.
Choking is when the pressure of a situation overcomes the player. That is not what happened in the Nebraska game.Please face reality that there are two halves to a game. No one said they suck. Stop your preaching to me, young fella.
Agreed. Btw - we also make comebacks in the second half all the time.Choking is when the pressure of a situation overcomes the player. That is not what happened in the Nebraska game.