Comparing apples to oranges. Ok, they are both fruits but you seem to think it's great that a Mac school beats a Big Ten program, once every four or five years.
It's happened to for 10 consecutive years, man. I believe it's now eleven.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Comparing apples to oranges. Ok, they are both fruits but you seem to think it's great that a Mac school beats a Big Ten program, once every four or five years.
They're still occasional. The Big Ten has a sizable lead in the series. How did the MAC do in week 1 vs the Big Ten? One win by one point.Well, the MAC has now been pulling off those occasional upsets for 11 straight seasons.
They're still occasional. The Big Ten has a sizable lead in the series.
There's absolutely new silver lining or consolation in losing to a MAC team. At home. Coming off 10 wins.
Stop being an apologist. Stop pretending this was perfectly fine.
Just off the top of my head, the MAC has beaten the following BIG (they've beaten other P5 schools too) program in the past 10 years:
Illinois
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Northwestern
Purdue
Rutgers
It's an annual thing.
Stanford 2015 aside, it's very unlikely that we will contend for a conference title if we can't take care of any unranked team at home. And if we are not trying to win the conference, what is the point of the Taj Ma-Fitz?I don't believe anyone here is saying it's fine to lose to WMU. Some are just being more level headed and understand that these things happen, even to good programs.
Time will tell whether NU 2016 is one of them, but one non conference loss does not make a season.
Stanford 2015 aside, it's very unlikely that we will contend for a conference title if we can't take care of any unranked team at home. And if we are not trying to win the conference, what is the point of the Taj Ma-Fitz?
So what? They're winning very few match ups annually.
There's nothing wrong with showing a little passion. And there's nothing 'ridiculous' about crediting a player or coach for openly taking a loss hard.
Pat is usually very animated on the sideline but he wasn't on Saturday. I took it to mean that he wasn't really surprised by the defense.
Oh and by the way, this is the second time in three years that you totally and embarrassingly crapped the bed. Remember when you said NIU had no chance against us? We lost. Now WMU. I guess those predictions by you were 'ridiculous.'
FWIW, Massey and S&P+ both have Illinois as 1 point favorite in that game. I'm guessing it'll be pretty close to a pick-em. I guess its time to load your account up with the lock of the year.
I think a lot of folks were happy with the play of the offense. I would say the defense played terribly, but the offense exceeded expectations.
I 'll ask a third time, who do you want running the program?
I've already posted that I am incredibly disappointed by the WMU game. I still don't think WMU was all that good. NU played a terrible game and was still in position to win.
Lol. I didn't go to NU. argument.
Clearly, he assumed that there would be no further scoring by either team, and that a three-point advantage would be crucial so that an unexpected late field goal would only send the game to OT.Speaking of coaching decisions, why does FSU go for 2 vs Ole Miss at 9:17 of the third quarter? Is Ron Zook coaching the Noles?
Let's see who is available at the end of the season.
By giving football the best remaining real estate on our entire campus, NU will definitely not remain satisfied with mediocrity. He will have to win or changes will be dictated. If he wants to quit rather than be disloyal to his buddies, then he can coach at Rutgers or UConn or some ACC school and we will see how good of a coach he really is....
It's one game. But it has created a very real vision that we are in for a rough season. Something has to be fixed.
Is this for real or am I getting punked?Why wait? Art Briles is bored at home! I'll play this game because xyzbobxyz will enjoy it.
Hypothetical universe. Jim Phillips demands that Pat fire some assistants. Pat resigns rather than be pressured to part with his soulmate, Adam Cushing.
Names that have been whispered among NU boosters I know?
Bob Stitt. Would not sell tickets, but his name comes up a lot in idle talk...... Ken Niumatalolo, a Mormon, turned down BYU, so I doubt he would leave Navy for NU..... Among MAC coaches (a frequent NU poaching ground), Illinois native P.J. Fleck would undoubtedly depart for a higher profile job at his soonest opportunity. How will Lance Leipold do in year 2 at Buffalo? Rod Carey has NIU pointed in the wrong direction, with fewer wins and more losses in each of the last three seasons...... If I had a vote, it would be for Fleck because the guy can recruit a hen to a fox's lair. You have to be able to recruit really well given the limited recruit pool at NU. Failing that, you have to be one helluva tactician like Stitt or a motivator like Leipold or a guy with a "system" like Niumatalolo.
Stats are for losers Ma'am .I'll tell you why I think you're wrong. It's not one game. It's 3 years plus + game.
For the last three years, our offense has been ranked #10, #12 and #13 in the Big Ten. That's 3rd to last, 3rd to last and next to last.
Tell that to ColumbusCatFan1. I think he might work for the Mid American Conference publicity department.
By keeping assistant coaches who consistently underperform, the message Fitz is sending is that he's ok with us being "good enough." For us, that is defined by winning at least six games in most years, making bowl games that we usually lose but might occasionally win, and always getting a pat on the head for "doing more with less."
As defeatist as this may sound, I can live with this, but I don't want to hear Fitz claim to want to compete for Big Ten championships, because he's not committed to doing what it takes to get there. He's committed to running a clean program and staying loyal to his boys which is both admirable and frustrating.
This was true before the WMU loss.
That's not a straw man. It is a legitimate question. Agreed that you never said you could make a better choice so it would appear that the man of straw has been set up; yet a straw man deliberately takes one away from a solid point. His question is the point.Is that the best you can do, create a straw man? I never said that *I* could identify a better head coach. I'm pretty sure that NU could hire someone very good, though.
We had one of best in Parseghian and Waldorf was well regarded in his day. Barnett was such a hot commodity that he turned down Notre Dame and UCLA. Green led Stanford and two NFL teams. Walker helped to change college football by bringing the spread to the Big Ten and his coaching tree includes an NFL head coach and several NCAA head coaches.
So to say that we would be hopeless and lost without Pat demonstrates a lack of historical perspective, my little purple kool aid youngling.
Again, kindly avoid straw man arguments. They just show you went to NU when admissions standards were too relaxed.
Broadcast? I was at the game supporting the NU football team. Where were you?Sure thing Willy.
Maybe try paying attention to the broadcast next time...
Broadcast? I was at the game supporting the NU football team. Where were you?
I heard/read about a new rec and athletics complex - where are they putting it and do you guys know details about practice facilities? In any case, as I said before, I think Big 10 titles are unrealistic goals. Unless we drastically drop our admissions standards (or have we already?) which I am strongly against.
The funny thing is I don't think a B1G title is out of reach, especially since the conference is now split into two divisions - winning the west is very achievable in any given year and then we'd just need to pull an upset (or what would be considered an upset in most years) to take out the East Division champs.
I don't think that requires us to modify our academic standards, and I don't think *most* NU fans would advocate for such changes...but I do think it requires us to have a wholesale upgrade in coaching talent. Right now Fitz is basically trying to win at the highest level with one hand tied behind his back, and it isn't going to happen.
Are you familiar with "The Problem of Fitz?" The "Fake by the Lake?" These are weighty issues that Wildcat Nation has been grappling with for some time now.If you want a Big10 title I think you better start by upgrading Fitz.
He's committed to running a clean program and staying loyal to his boys which is both admirable and frustrating.
Don't think that there is much that any of us can do in getting Fitz to move on but just maybe when Phillips moves up to Big Ten commissioner there might be a chance. Fitz for AD could work. After all it is said that he's the face of the university and I would agree with that. He has the personality and the energy to glad hand with the "big boy" donors and sell the university and it's athletic programs. Otherwise might as well settle for a good season every 4 or 5 years, maybe a bowl win every ten or so years and assistant coaches who are at best mediocre but and not coveted by other programs. Maybe Dave Wannstedt would be interested.Pat Fitzgerald, for all his flaws, barring some really unforeseen craziness going down, likely has the HC job at NU for as long as he wants it. Please note that while he was my favorite college player of all time, and while his name/number is my posting handle, I have been very open about my feelings that Fitz leaves a lot to be desired as far as Xs and Os, and that his loyalty to his assistants is a weakness, and that NU might be better served with a different HC. That said, we may as well just resign ourselves to it, because it's not going to change.
And if you might say, "Well, no! That's unacceptable!" I ask, what exactly can we do, or even better, what are *you* willing to do, to get a message across that we do not accept it?
Wasn't Stanford pretty highly ranked last year? Maybe not top 5 when we beat them but much more importantly they were in the mix and highly ranked at the end of the year. Based on what you saw with LSU, do you really feel they will be there late in the year?What a laugh. Claeys hasn't been Minny's head man for a full season yet but you just know he's inferior? (Im inclined to agree with you, but what's the basis other than Fitzgerald has been a head coach longer?) Jury is out on Lovie too.
Chryst just beat LSU. Weren't they #4? When is the last time Pat beat a top 5 team? BY MY COUNT, 7 YEARS AGO.
Riley has won 100 college games and is 7-2 in bowls. What is Pat's record in bowls?
Saying any of these guys would fail at NU is another straw man. That's not what the other poster said and it's completely unprovable that they would have a poorer record at NU than Pat does.
Is this for real or am I getting punked?
Bob Stitt. Won't sell tickets is an understatement? 95% of our fans and players/recruits won't even know who he is? Has he ever even been an Assistant in D1? Lance Leipold? Either those boosters are watching too many short features on ESPN or they are smoking the pipe. Winning in D3 is quite a bit different than winning in D1. Guys in their 50's having getting their first P5 snot with little to no experience at D1 even as an Assistant will not happen. Might be good coaches throughout their career at their level, but that ship has sailed.
Niumatalolo works great for where he is at. Hard to prepare for his O unless you see it EVERY year. Nice guy, seems to do things the right way, but his best bet is to stay where he is at. Fleck at least has shown the ability to recruit ( for a MAC level) and turn a program around. He will get his shot after this season. Purdue? He will likely be able to turn a program to a potentially mid tier P5. Compete with Urban, Harballs, Dantonio, I very much doubt it. I only bring them up because you hammer on Fitz for his record against them. If you or any booster think Fleck gets us to titles in the B1G at NU, I can't help you.
Maybe Dave Wannstedt would be interested.
Wasn't Stanford pretty highly ranked last year? Maybe not top 5 when we beat them but much more importantly they were in the mix and highly ranked at the end of the year. Based on what you saw with LSU, do you really feel they will be there late in the year?
I think Stanford was in the top 25 but definitely not top 5 when we played them. Fitzgerald has only beaten one team that was in the top 5 at the time we played them and that was SEVEN years ago.
... might as well settle for a good season every 4 or 5 years, maybe a bowl win every ten or so years and assistant coaches who are at best mediocre but and not coveted by other programs.
That's not surprising. We aren't good enough to be beating Top 5 teams except once in a blue moon.
Glen Mason had the best overall record at Minnesota since Murray Warmath despite playing off campus in that awful dome. His successor Tim Brewster put the program in the tank despite having a new stadium to dangle in front of recruits. Just sayin'Fitzgerald has shown that is exactly the best that he can do. He has been more consistent than Walker or Barnett but do you know who Fitz really reminds me of?
Fitz is our Glen Mason.