I'm not one to gloss over the fact that we started playing better after Roper got injured.
That doesn't necessarily mean much when comparing Martinelli to Roper. It could just mean that we had 3 guards who were better than Roper and his minutes were subtracting from their overall performance.
Or it could mean that Barnhizer's additional minutes were better than Roper's. Or it could mean that Nicholson was improving coincidentally. All of those things are possible.
In the last 10 games of last season, Martinelli had the best ratio of "NU Points / Opponent Points" of anyone on the team, so he had established his quality, in my opinion.
So far this year, that distinction goes to Luke Hunger.
That doesn't necessarily mean much when comparing Martinelli to Roper. It could just mean that we had 3 guards who were better than Roper and his minutes were subtracting from their overall performance.
Or it could mean that Barnhizer's additional minutes were better than Roper's. Or it could mean that Nicholson was improving coincidentally. All of those things are possible.
In the last 10 games of last season, Martinelli had the best ratio of "NU Points / Opponent Points" of anyone on the team, so he had established his quality, in my opinion.
So far this year, that distinction goes to Luke Hunger.