I just went through four threads and found posts by handles I have never seen before.
A check showed many are registered just recently. As in last week, or the week or two before.
Some are pro Fitz (a few, not many but a few) but many, seem very anti Fitz. In fact those posts seem to have almost a legalish elemant to their substance. " Well we will see in depostiions under oath what X has to say".
Beware guys that we are not being bombarded with posts from law firms here.
Not saying you have to be pro-Fitz. Nor is he some Saint who didn't make some mistakes. I don't know what went on, I wan't there. He has the guys in the Daily article saying bad things and an equal amount saying "nothing like that happened or if Fitz had known he would have ended it right then and there".
Just....check the "date registered, date of first post" for some people and think about why these people became huge Wildcat fans after a lawsuit was filed.
Hey, could be wrong or whatever! Just pointing something out!
Oh, and some could be Law Enforcement too!
A check showed many are registered just recently. As in last week, or the week or two before.
Some are pro Fitz (a few, not many but a few) but many, seem very anti Fitz. In fact those posts seem to have almost a legalish elemant to their substance. " Well we will see in depostiions under oath what X has to say".
Beware guys that we are not being bombarded with posts from law firms here.
Not saying you have to be pro-Fitz. Nor is he some Saint who didn't make some mistakes. I don't know what went on, I wan't there. He has the guys in the Daily article saying bad things and an equal amount saying "nothing like that happened or if Fitz had known he would have ended it right then and there".
Just....check the "date registered, date of first post" for some people and think about why these people became huge Wildcat fans after a lawsuit was filed.
Hey, could be wrong or whatever! Just pointing something out!
Oh, and some could be Law Enforcement too!