Denied a 6th year of NCAA Division 1 eligibility....will play at D-2 level in 2017. Sounds like a tough break for the kid. I wish him the best. And oh yeah, screw the NCAA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here is Park's explanation from his Twitter page: "Due to an injury I sustained last spring, I was unable to complete during the 2016 season. I did not qualify for a medical redshirt because I did not miss two full seasons due to injury. Missing this year meant that I exhausted my eligibility at Northwestern and the Division 1 level."
I didn't know about the requirement that you miss two full seasons due to injury to obtain a medical redshirt for a sixth year. That is a terrible rule. If you miss a season because of injury, you should be allowed to obtain a medical redshirt regardless of it is your fifth or sixth year. That rule simply punishes kids who redshirt their freshman season.
There was a time every Saturday that the Slippery Rock football score would always be mentioned on national TV coverage. With a wink and a grin they would pay homage to the coolest named university on the planet. We'll be giving more attention to those scores again this coming fall. Wishing Ian nothing but the best in all he does.
No, it's not the bureaucracy of the NCAA that did this to him. The NCAA is "us". The rules are not made by the folks in Indianapolis; they are made and voted on by the member institutions. I agree the rule that prohibited Ian from playing another year at NU is a stupid rule, but that is what the Division I committee and member institutions decided. I was part of the folks who voted at the Division II level to have more reasonable, student-friendly rules. The folks in Indy get dumped on a lot, but many times they think the rules are stupid too, but they are required to enforce them - just like attorneys sometimes have to defend people they know are guilty.Yes, doesn't seem to make sense. Ian's a good kid who is getting hosed by the bureaucracy of the NCAA.
No, it's not the bureaucracy of the NCAA that did this to him. The NCAA is "us". The rules are not made by the folks in Indianapolis; they are made and voted on by the member institutions. I agree the rule that prohibited Ian from playing another year at NU is a stupid rule, but that is what the Division I committee and member institutions decided. I was part of the folks who voted at the Division II level to have more reasonable, student-friendly rules. The folks in Indy get dumped on a lot, but many times they think the rules are stupid too, but they are required to enforce them - just like attorneys sometimes have to defend people they know are guilty.
Totally agree. Several years ago Division II folks went through their rules and regulations and cleaned things up; I think we cut the book by a third. But every time we came to a rule that seemed stupid, there was always a story behind why it was introduced and passed - some institutions (often DI institutions) would do crazy stuff to cheat. They felt the chance of getting caught was low and the penalties not that bad (and head coaches were not held responsible for what went on in their programs, and they figured they will have moved on by the time the school is caught and penalized; in theory that has changed now with head coaches being responsible for anything that happens and penalties can travel with a coach - in theory, of course). Serious penalties for the real cheaters would help, but I just don't see it happening.Then "we" need to change them. Every year there are countless examples of things that make no logical sense. Most of these dumb rules are put in place to close loop holes so institutions don't use those loop holes to their advantage. I remember back in the Stone Age not being able to get a job because somebody hired a bunch of student athletes to "work" at a car dealership where they were paid excessively or paid for not even showing up. Here's an idea for the NCAA, how about some meaningful penalties for the rogue violations that actually act as a deterrent.
It is crazy that they have a limit on when and how often you can use a medical redshirt. To me, you should have an unlimited number of medical redshirt years available. If you have a documented injury and cannot play whether that be your first or sixth year, then you should not lose a year of eligibility because of that. And if that means a guy uses multiple medical redshirt years, then I don't see what the problem is.
A 25 year old man competing against 18 and 19 year olds.
Do you mean like at BYU?
A 25 year old man competing against 18 and 19 year olds.
What is the difference in physical stature between a 21 yo senior and a 25 yo? Everyone is fully grown by that time. There are no upper age limit rules for NCAA participation, are there? And what incentive would there be for an athlete to stick around that long just to game the system? I could see some shady programs trying to get kids through this system somehow so they were a couple years older when using up their eligibility but it would be very hard to prove the medical need for it, and hard to see kids going along with it.
Will he be a dominant player at Slippery Rock? How much does the competition fall off? Will he get any NFL or CFL recognition? or does he just want to play one more season?
No not everyone is "fully grown" as a 21 year old. Four more years of high-level strength and conditioning make a HUGE difference.
The most common type of examples at 25 will be guys that served in the military, may have tried another sport like baseball and failed, or came from Austraila to punt. 25 year old players with extended playing gaps or limited experience aren't just going to fall out of trees and be difference makers.