Not with the coach, but with the program the coach has built. They put in four good years and realized that their goals weren’t attainable.
And Kopp realized that he wasn’t good enough to be The Guy on a team, so he went somewhere he didn’t have to be.
In all three cases, the players made good choices for themselves. Only RY maybe had a problem with how he was used.
But, if you’ve got starters and sixth men leaving the program, committed players who have put in the work and shown to be loyal soldiers, and they simply realize that their goals aren’t achievable, it takes a lot of twisting and turning to point to it as a good thing.
The majority of mid-tier to low-tier programs have contributors who start for 2/3/4 years. At NU, a relatively high percentage of those players choose to leave before 3/4/5.
Adding contributors like Gaines or Benson or Ash here definitely constitutes a trend even if, in all cases, we can understand why they would leave. If NU were succeeding, they wouldn’t *want* to leave.