Every year someone comes on this board and pulls some non-sense about Lebron being better than Jordan out their ass. Then someone else comes up with some "proof" that because Jordan had Pippen and Rodman or Grant on his team, he wasn't as good as Lebron. Jordan made Pippen a hall of famer. Pippen didn't make Jordan a champion. He was unreliable in late game situations. He crumbled with a headache against the pistons or the bulls would've had a championship a year soon. Jordan gets poisoned and drops 38. Pippen gets a headache and cowers. Give me a break. If you don't like me writing that every year and think reading it is a waste of time, then DON'T READ IT. Better yet, make sure everyone doesn't post the initial stuff like Lebron is better than Jordan or Jordan had Pippen so Lebron must be better.
Counter points to everything you said:
Chuck Daley didn't need anyone on that team. Let's get real. In the tournament of the Americas they won the opening round by 79 and the closet game was 38 points. In the Olympics, they beat Croatia by 32 and it wasn't that competitive. I've also heard someone closely involved with the dream team saying Charles Barkley was the key player. News flash, everyone on that team was pretty much better than everyone they played.
Yes, yes, the other 47:30 of a game matter... but according to Jalen Rose who's the most honest player I've heard talking, said that the measure of a player is who you want with the ball in his hands or on the ball with the game on the line.
Stats don't mean anything: winning does. Pippen was highly motivated when Jordan retired to prove himself and put up some numbers and he did. They also had a nice regular season but didn't really do anything in the playoffs. Great. The next season without Jordan, the bulls won 52% of their games before Jordan came back. After Jordan came back, they won 76% of their regular season games. See the big difference. Jordan took a .500 team ie mediocre and turned them into champions in a year. The difference between 93-94 and 94-95: Horace Grant left. Pippen was the top guy on a mediocre team, so that makes him above-average.
So Pippen says he didn't think he fouled Davis? That's supposed to matter? Pippen also said he made Michael Jordan, so clearly Pippen doesn't get a say. Did refs swallow whistles? They sure did. They shouldn't have, and that doesn't make a foul not a foul. Was Jordan's push off on Russell not a foul because no ref ever was going to call it? Yes, Jordan did it, he got away with it, but that doesn't mean he didn't do it.
Did I miss anything?
Yeah. You missed pretty much everything.
Arguing that Pippen was a great player doesn't diminish Jordan in any way. I am not sure why you have to rely on that in making your case. Wade in his prime was a better player than Pippen and a better teammate for Lebron. I think Pippen is a better teammate for Jordan.
Yes. Everyone on the floor was better than the competition in the Olympics. That's why Daley's opinion is meaningful. Among all those all-time great players, he wanted Pippen on the floor in situations that mattered. During the Dream Team practices, Daley called Scottie his second-best player and told David Halberstam, "You never really know how good a player he is until you coach him, but Pippen was a great surprise in Barcelona – the confidence with which he played and the absolutely complete nature of his game, both on offense and defense. No one else really expected it." According to Halberstam, MJ returned to Chicago after the Olympics and told Phil Jackson, ‘Scottie came in as just one of the other players, and none of the others knew how good he was, but then he kept playing, and by the end of the week it was clear that he was the top guard there – over Clyde and Magic and Stockton. It was great for people to see him in that setting and see how good he really was." You want a quote from Phil Jackson? "Scottie was our team leader. He was the guy that directed our offense and he was the guy that took on a lot of big challenges defensively
...the year that Michael retired, Scottie I think was the most valuable player in the league". How about Ron Harper? "‘Everybody talks about MJ first, but Pip had a more all-around game. Defense, offensive rebounds, defensive boards: Pip made the game easier for us to play." How about Bill Cartwright? Scottie "was as much a part of winning the championships as MJ. I don't think it would have gotten done without him." It's clear that you know more about basketball than Daley, Jackson and his teammates, but I thought I would throw those out there for the hell of it.
The Bulls had Jordan. They didn't need two guys taking the last shot. They needed a guy that did everything else.
Yes. Adding Michael Jordan made the Bulls a lot better in 94-95. If Michael played on that team without Scottie, do you really think that even he was going to take Luc Longley, B.J. Armstrong, Ron Harper, Dickie Simpkins and Kuckoc to the NBA Finals? Adding Scottie at the end of the year would have had a huge impact as well. When Scottie missed the first 35 games in 1998, the Bulls lost a lot games.
And the telling quote on the Davis play was from Davis not Pippen. He said you don't usually get that call. Kerr said that in the NBA at that time, you
never got that call. If you touched the guy after he released the shot, it was not a foul. I don't really care that you think it should be a foul. It mattered how the ref's called it, and in the mid-90's that was not a foul.