True. But employees still can follow executives around. They just cannot be solicited by the executive after he/she has left.In the corporate world a "non-compete" clause is pretty standard these days...at least in my industry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True. But employees still can follow executives around. They just cannot be solicited by the executive after he/she has left.In the corporate world a "non-compete" clause is pretty standard these days...at least in my industry.
Don't think most have even seen the campus. They aren't going there to play no school.I would take a Minny degree over a WMU degree in a heartbeat.
Don't think most have even seen the campus. They aren't going there to play no school.
I would take playing football at Minnesota over WMU in a heart beat too. Who cares that Minnesota is pulling 6 kids who's best offers were MAC programs?Don't think most have even seen the campus. They aren't going there to play no school.
I was just about to ask the same. Did Minny have 6 or more available scholarships or were six committed recruits "creamed"?
I would take playing football at Minnesota over WMU in a heart beat too. Who cares that Minnesota is pulling 6 kids who's best offers were MAC programs?
Why is it any worse than not extending an offer to these kids? For all we know the next WMU coach might run the triple option and maybe these kids as players would be totally unsuited for that style? When people change jobs there are ripple affects - it happens all the time and people learn to adapt.The WMU players that helped recruit them and who Fleck spun his family BS too.
I don't think they are recruits that have many B1G offers, some I don't think had any. The balance of power isn't shifting, I know.
Personally, I am not worried about Fleck building a power like some seem to be. IMO he has an enormous ego and his no respect schtick is tiresome.
I just think it is a crappy thing to do to your former players when you harp on we are all in this together.
Why is it any worse than not extending an offer to these kids? For all we know the next WMU coach might run the triple option and maybe these kids as players would be totally unsuited for that style? When people change jobs there are ripple affects - it happens all the time and people learn to adapt.
If you're telling me these kids at WMU or being recruited to WMU didn't realize fleck would be gone once the first major offer came his way, then I think you're a little naive. Everyone at WMU knew this was just a matter of time.
Maybe that is why Fleck got the job, he could promise 6 replacement players and start with a pretty clean slate after the scandal. Win WinI don't know, but with the 10 suspended players undergoing University eligibility review, I think it's a good bet that some of them won't return.....
I hope so, considering both he and Minnesota took it to NU this year.Let's just say I can't wait to spank his smug ass at Ryan Field next year.
You might disagree with the transfers, but to try to say this is a negative academically is not even close to accurate. If you take a look at the academic comparison if WMU to Minn. they aren't even close.The fact the kids flip to Minny without even seeing the school tells you the idea of student athlete is laughable.
Most P5 schools simply use NCAA Clearinghouse requirements.
It is pretty standard, and that's why it's allowed to happen over and again. It should be outlawed, in that a coach can only take a player to a new school if that player already had an offer from the new school prior to the new coach taking it over. Just BS. The kids who chose Western Michigan this year, 15-20 kids or so, still have options and if they chose WMU for Fleck, they did it for the wrong reasons and should have to reconsider their own recent choices. Instead, Fleck is allowed to flip them, kids WMU paid to recruit through its own recruiting budget, and completely f--- WMU, the entire current team who will be significantly weakened for years by having a depleted '17 class, and its fans and donors. Just deplorable IMO, commonplace or not. Walker wouldn't do it, if you remember, and turned recent Miami of Ohio recruits away who asked to follow him to NU.
Then that is sad for the B1G. I am. Not surprised Minny did this as they have taken chances on marginal qualifiers that other P5 schools turned down (not implying any of these flips are marginal). However it is a sad statement - and I would say pretty unfair to the admissions process as a whole - to immediately accept six verbals from kids who could not possibly have gone through the admissions process in less than 24 hours (it was mentioned that none were recruited by Minny prior to Fleck).
Why don't you stop reading it or start your own thread on some scintillating topic?This is such an annoying thread
Fleck did NOTHING WRONG
I think it's only six because those six made qualifications.Does anyone really think that these six flips were all vetted scholastically by Minny? I don't think it speaks well for Minny's academic standards for its' athletic program. Fleck apparently has carte-blanche.
What is the over/under on when Minny goes on probation?I think it's only six because those six made qualifications.
I think that some posters see disingenuousness in a coach that goes all in for the school and recruits all in the for the school when, in reality, he might leave for a better offer at any time. I think that they believe he should wear a t-shirt with a warning label on it when he visits recruits that says "WARNING: If I get an offer that doubles my salary and increases my chances to compete at the highest level, I may change jobs without notice."Am I reading this correctly? Let's punish unsigned student-athletes who want to play for Fleck because a Fleck takes another job? A school takes priority over the wishes of the player? Why? Because the fans don't want their precious football team to suffer? Boo hoo. That should be lowest priority, IMO, and yeah, I know they were recruited on the first school's dime. Tough! That school chose to play in this athletics circus sideshow, even though it is not a part of their mission.
What do people want? Zero mobility for coaches? Force students to choose schools rather than coaches, even though only about 4.31% players actually select schools on the basis of their academics. How can most athletes even evaluate other aspects of the school aside from the football program anyway? Many don't even know what they want to major in. There is simply no fair way to handle a coaching change that is far to athletes. Former NU players wanted to play for Barnett so badly they burned some of their eligibility.
Then the silly academic standards and vetting thing, as if Minny has any higher standards for athletes than a MAC school. Considering how many JUCO players they take, Minny may have even lower standards than a few MAC programs. It's amazing how low schools go to cash in on NCAA athletics.
Maybe I need another cup of coffee and a pinch of snuff to understand this thread.
As we all know, there are a lot of instances of decommits right before signing day. At least WMU has some time frame to go in another direction.
I think that some posters see disingenuousness in a coach that goes all in for the school and recruits all in the for the school when, in reality, he might leave for a better offer at any time. I think that they believe he should wear a t-shirt with a warning label on it when he visits recruits that says "WARNING: If I get an offer that doubles my salary and increases my chances to compete at the highest level, I may change jobs without notice."
How many people on this board have said something like "I want to settle down and make a career with your company." And then left four years later.
There is nothing wrong with this.
Poaching unsigned recruits? A little tacky but still not really wrong. If they want to play for the coach and the new school and they have not signed, then they have that right.
I think people forget the other side of this. A new coach at WMU does not have to honor any verbal commits given to the past coach. There are countless cases of kids who have committed to schools that have seen the coach fired and then they are out in the cold. In this case, we are talking MAC and B1G and MAC schools understand this. They lose committed recruits all the time when a last minute spot opens near signing day at a B1G school and they throw a late offer to a MAC player. I don't think anyone is getting hurt with this move.
I believe that Tim Lester has some openings at WMU.What about the 5 commits that Claeys had at Minny that have been "forced" to decommit when PJ didn't honor Claeys offer?
I believe that Tim Lester has some openings at WMU.
1. A new coach comes in and sits down with a commit. He explains that the commit's abilities do not align with the incoming style of play. The commit will almost certainly never make the two deep and will never play. Discuss it and come to a mutual agreement. They leave. Incoming coach is evil?
2. A new coach comes in and realizes the previous regime had very different standards as regards player character and sees potential problems in the background checks of some of the present commits. He explains to them clearly what will be expected of them and that they will be under zero-tolerance starting right now. Discuss it and come to mutual agreement. They leave. Incoming coach is evil?
I have no knowledge of any facts regarding Minnesota. I am just postulating some scenarios where it is appropriate for an incoming coach to make changes among his commits.
What about the 5 commits that Claeys had at Minny that have been "forced" to decommit when PJ didn't honor Claeys offer?
It's true that this type of stuff happens at a loot of Power 5 schools but it doesn't make it right. Having a talk with cmmittted recruits regarding possible playing time is one thing but just kicking them to the curb is another. Yes, Fleck may have different character standards then the previous HC but seems like his might present even more problems. He ain't no Mr. Clean.I believe that Tim Lester has some openings at WMU.
1. A new coach comes in and sits down with a commit. He explains that the commit's abilities do not align with the incoming style of play. The commit will almost certainly never make the two deep and will never play. Discuss it and come to a mutual agreement. They leave. Incoming coach is evil?
2. A new coach comes in and realizes the previous regime had very different standards as regards player character and sees potential problems in the background checks of some of the present commits. He explains to them clearly what will be expected of them and that they will be under zero-tolerance starting right now. Discuss it and come to mutual agreement. They leave. Incoming coach is evil?
I have no knowledge of any facts regarding Minnesota. I am just postulating some scenarios where it is appropriate for an incoming coach to make changes among his commits.
http://minnesota.247sports.com/Season/2017-Football/DecommitsDo you have a link to a list of the forced decommitts? I'd be interested to see the names. Thx
Whats the big deal ? If he has any success at Minn . he will be gone in 3 to 4 years anyway,
I believe he lost two young children to congenital heart problems. No one should go through that.I did not realize that Fleck lost a very young child to a heart condition.
That's a road I wish no one would ever have to travel. I wish him the best.
I believe he lost two young children to congenital heart problems. No one should go through that.