ADVERTISEMENT

Prater and Siemian Update

Katatonic

Well-Known Member
Oct 23, 2004
12,146
1,443
113
Don't know how much action Prater saw but had 1 reception for 19 yds.

Really hope Prater at least ends up on the PS, but that's going to be tough with so many players fighting for what positions are available at wide-out for the Saints.


Siemian played the 4th Q against the Seahawks and did well - 5 of 6 for 90 yds, including a 41 completion that was the long for the game.

Bronco fans are climbing aboard the Siemian bandwagon.

Still early, but like Siemian's chances of at least landing on the PS; feel bad for the QB ahead of him on the depth chart, Dysert, as fans are already waiting for him to be shipped out.
 
Don't know how much action Prater saw but had 1 reception for 19 yds.

Really hope Prater at least ends up on the PS, but that's going to be tough with so many players fighting for what positions are available at wide-out for the Saints.


Siemian played the 4th Q against the Seahawks and did well - 5 of 6 for 90 yds, including a 41 completion that was the long for the game.

Bronco fans are climbing aboard the Siemian bandwagon.

Still early, but like Siemian's chances of at least landing on the PS; feel bad for the QB ahead of him on the depth chart, Dysert, as fans are already waiting for him to be shipped out.


Way to go Trevor !! Good Job Kyle ! So far the NU players in the NFL are showing up very well. Proud of them.

Go Cats !
 
Way to go Trevor !! Good Job Kyle ! So far the NU players in the NFL are showing up very well. Proud of them.

Go Cats !
Gee these guys are from the two most criticized positions on last seasons team. Could it be coaching? I'll duck and wait for your responses.
 
Gee these guys are from the two most criticized positions on last seasons team. Could it be coaching? I'll duck and wait for your responses.

There's an old adage that if your looking for skeletons in a closet, you'll find them whether they're there or not. Is it at all possible that Prater was injured for most of his college career and that as he healed near the end of his senior season he started to excel? Is it possible the Trevor was also injured and that his skill set was not ideal for NUs offense?

Cmon Willy
 
Gee these guys are from the two most criticized positions on last seasons team. Could it be coaching? I'll duck and wait for your responses.
As to Siemian, it seems clear he got good coaching from McCall. That is why the Broncos people are already praising his "presence" and intelligence on the field. His occasional struggles at NU had little to do with his position coaching, IMHO. I'll leave it at that.
 
I agree that Trevor was coached well,has a strong arm and is adequately mobile. I also believe that he was not 100% last year and the O-line did not perform very well. What I dont understand is why we kept playing him under those circumstances and either did not put Oliver in...go to the spread with Alviti....or give THorson his baptism? And maybe after a couple of weeks along Trevor could have come back at 100% or maybe we even would have discovered that we could be successful with the spread and even have gotten the other 3 qbs some experience. As it was we got none of those and didnt get to a bowl game. Did we have so little faith in the other 3 at that point that we kept playing an injured,immobile quarterback behind a mediocre O-line as our best option?
 
I agree that Trevor was coached well,has a strong arm and is adequately mobile. I also believe that he was not 100% last year and the O-line did not perform very well. What I dont understand is why we kept playing him under those circumstances and either did not put Oliver in...go to the spread with Alviti....or give THorson his baptism? And maybe after a couple of weeks along Trevor could have come back at 100% or maybe we even would have discovered that we could be successful with the spread and even have gotten the other 3 qbs some experience. As it was we got none of those and didnt get to a bowl game. Did we have so little faith in the other 3 at that point that we kept playing an injured,immobile quarterback behind a mediocre O-line as our best option?

If we were to change your last sentence to "So little faith in the other two" (as it absolutely wasn't worth burning Clayton's redshirt late in the season) then I would say yes. That's why you stay with your best option until you can't anymore.
 
I agree that Trevor was coached well,has a strong arm and is adequately mobile. I also believe that he was not 100% last year and the O-line did not perform very well. What I dont understand is why we kept playing him under those circumstances and either did not put Oliver in...go to the spread with Alviti....or give THorson his baptism? And maybe after a couple of weeks along Trevor could have come back at 100% or maybe we even would have discovered that we could be successful with the spread and even have gotten the other 3 qbs some experience. As it was we got none of those and didnt get to a bowl game. Did we have so little faith in the other 3 at that point that we kept playing an injured,immobile quarterback behind a mediocre O-line as our best option?

Because Trevor was continuing to consistently make good throws despite the OL issues. The WRs and their drops were the bigger reason our pass game struggled last season.
 
Gee these guys are from the two most criticized positions on last seasons team. Could it be coaching? I'll duck and wait for your responses.
Actually, I recall the board being very positive with regard to Prater. He was hurt when he got to Evanston but was clearly the best of the bunch last year.
 
Because Trevor was continuing to consistently make good throws despite the OL issues. The WRs and their drops were the bigger reason our pass game struggled last season.
Gocatsgo +1 I was a fervent backer of Trevor. I don't think many folks understand just how many of those dropped passes effected the outcome of games. Often when things like that happen, then the QB tries to make PERFECT throws so they get caught and not dropped. In these times they may try to guide the ball like a pitcher who is struggling does. The result is that instead of doing things innately (i.e.) gripping it and ripping it they try to be to perfect and then struggle.
Another factor was the line that was poor, but the coaching from McCall even worse. I believe the best example of that was the Michigan game when color commentator Ed Cunningham who was an offensive lineman in the NFL, all but said that McCall was an idiot. His comments that he felt sorry for Trevor and that the line was not meant to block the way it was being asked to. You'll recall that finally after Cunningham harped for three quarters about the line play, in the fourth quarter, McCall began moving Trevor and suddenly the offense started to move the ball and we should have won the game. The next game against ND we did win with more movement and an awesome game from Trevor. Purdue was more of the same until he got hurt.
So in a long winded answer because of injuries, a poor line, receivers who routinely dropped passes and an OC who appeared to be utterly clueless at times last year, Trevor struggled until the ND game when he really turned it up. As a point of fact, even in the ND game TJ dropped two sure TD passes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJCat83588
Even if I give you Trevor consistently throwing the ball well,( which I dont, and believe he was finally getting healthy at ND), and we add poor receivers to the litany of issues with the passing game, why did we not move to a more mobile running qb earlier and allow TS to get healthier sooner? I have to think the only answer was the staff did not think the others were ready as of yet(not that they arent now) or that at least Trevor could keep it close enough that the D could carry the day to get us to 6 wins....and that was almost correct. In the end it was a plan that did not work and we will never know about the other options.
 
Even if I give you Trevor consistently throwing the ball well,( which I dont, and believe he was finally getting healthy at ND), and we add poor receivers to the litany of issues with the passing game, why did we not move to a more mobile running qb earlier and allow TS to get healthier sooner? I have to think the only answer was the staff did not think the others were ready as of yet(not that they arent now) or that at least Trevor could keep it close enough that the D could carry the day to get us to 6 wins....and that was almost correct. In the end it was a plan that did not work and we will never know about the other options.

Because he was clearly the best option at QB. We can keep going in circles if you'd like.
 
Gee these guys are from the two most criticized positions on last seasons team. Could it be coaching? I'll duck and wait for your responses.

Yes and no.


Is it at all possible that Prater was injured for most of his college career and that as he healed near the end of his senior season he started to excel? Is it possible the Trevor was also injured and that his skill set was not ideal for NUs offense?

Prater really came on strong late in the season - catching for over 80 yds in each of the games against UM, ND and PU; and this was w/ a receiving group w/o the Shuler, who was the one speed threat.

Some of those catches were things of beauty - really tough, clutch catches on 3rd down.

Don't think it was a coincidence that Prater's production rose (his one other 80+ yds reception game was against NIU) once the coaches started moving the pocket and let Siemian buy time w/ his legs.

I disagree about Siemian's skill set in not being ideal for NU's O.

When healthy (meaning being able to move scramble/roll out), Siemian really got the O humming even w/ the deficiencies at O-line and receivers.

The renewed passing threat is also what got Jackson and Green their long runs towards the end of the season as opposing DCs would call a play against the pass and NU would counter w/ a delayed draw (Green's longest run of the season).


Actually, I recall the board being very positive with regard to Prater. He was hurt when he got to Evanston but was clearly the best of the bunch last year.

If Prater had Christian Jones on the other side to attract some attention and a healthy TS who could buy some time w/ his legs, think the 2 would have put up some big nos.


As to Siemian, it seems clear he got good coaching from McCall. That is why the Broncos people are already praising his "presence" and intelligence on the field. His occasional struggles at NU had little to do with his position coaching, IMHO. I'll leave it at that.

The 3 things they like (and not just from the 1 quarter in pre-season play but from camp) are Siemian's arm strength, touch/accuracy and poise.

As for coaching, who know who gets the credit for that - probably a mix of Siemian's HS coaches, McCall, Jeff Christensen (the Midwest QB Guru) and Baz (think Siemian got in on some of the workouts Baz had during his time tenure w/ the Bears, but Kafka and Persa getting the most work w/ Baz), but McCall didn't always do Siemian favors w/ his playcalling.


I agree that Trevor was coached well,has a strong arm and is adequately mobile. I also believe that he was not 100% last year and the O-line did not perform very well. What I dont understand is why we kept playing him under those circumstances and either did not put Oliver in...go to the spread with Alviti....or give THorson his baptism?

Did we have so little faith in the other 3 at that point that we kept playing an injured,immobile quarterback behind a mediocre O-line as our best option?

Basically speaks ill of the readiness of the QBs behind TS.

But even so, Siemian should not have been in the game against Western where TS was clearly in pain and really limited when it came to planting his leg for throws.

Also, in the 4th Q against UNL when the NU receiving corps had been decimated, there was little point in keeping TS in there - Siemian basically had little time to throw and had to throw precise darts (for not much gain) - a miss by few inches and would have resulted in an INT and probably a pick-6.

And when the coaching staff did finally put in Oliver against Iowa, didn't see the point as they had Oliver sitting back there like a statue - which is what Siemian could have done (but he took enough of a beating as it was).



Gocatsgo +1 I was a fervent backer of Trevor. I don't think many folks understand just how many of those dropped passes effected the outcome of games. Often when things like that happen, then the QB tries to make PERFECT throws so they get caught and not dropped. In these times they may try to guide the ball like a pitcher who is struggling does. The result is that instead of doing things innately (i.e.) gripping it and ripping it they try to be to perfect and then struggle.

Not surprisingly, saw the same struggles w/ Hackenberg and the PSU O last season and in both cases, the inexperienced receivers would run incorrect routes or run the routes poorly w/ the flack going to the QB from the less discerning fans (this is why Prater became Siemian's go-to guy - ran the correct routes).


Another factor was the line that was poor, but the coaching from McCall even worse. I believe the best example of that was the Michigan game when color commentator Ed Cunningham who was an offensive lineman in the NFL, all but said that McCall was an idiot. His comments that he felt sorry for Trevor and that the line was not meant to block the way it was being asked to. You'll recall that finally after Cunningham harped for three quarters about the line play, in the fourth quarter, McCall began moving Trevor and suddenly the offense started to move the ball and we should have won the game. The next game against ND we did win with more movement and an awesome game from Trevor. Purdue was more of the same until he got hurt.

Not going to expand on this since I've talked about it enough already.


So in a long winded answer because of injuries, a poor line, receivers who routinely dropped passes and an OC who appeared to be utterly clueless at times last year, Trevor struggled until the ND game when he really turned it up. As a point of fact, even in the ND game TJ dropped two sure TD passes.

But for dropped passes, TS would have had over 300 yds passing in both the Cal and NIU games as well.

And TS was healthy back then - one has to seriously wonder why the coaching staff didn't move the pocket/have TS roll out and put added pressure on the opposing D (while Jackson had some productive runs, had limited carries and Green averaged 2.8 and 2.6 ypc).

Even w/ the problems on the O-line and receiver, Siemian's leg injury really made things that much worse on O.

Still, would have been nice to have had say, Indiana's O-line from last year (despite no passing threat once Sudfeld went down and opposing Ds keying on the run, the IU O-line managed to open big holes for Coleman.

Imagine what Siemian and Jackson could have done behind that O-line (never mind that for UW, Minny, dOSU, MSU, etc.).

And once Jones went down, the WR group became real thin w/ 2 transfers, Prater and Shuler being key members (until they went down w/ injuries themselves).

These 2 positions in particular have had issues w/ recruiting and/or player development of late.

Previously, it had been the DBs and at RB w/ the DT position not getting the depth it needs (but that's been a long standing problem).

Anyhow, both IC (5 tackles) and Lawrence (3 grabs for 25 yds) had pretty good showings as well on Friday.

On a side note, Happ in his 2nd start for the Pirates pitched pretty well, giving up 1 ER in 5.1 innings against the Mets.
 
Last edited:
Yes and no.




Prater really came on strong late in the season - catching for over 80 yds in each of the games against UM, ND and PU; and this was w/ a receiving group w/o the Shuler, who was the one speed threat.

Some of those catches were things of beauty - really tough, clutch catches on 3rd down.

Don't think it was a coincidence that Prater's production rose (his one other 80+ yds reception game was against NIU) once the coaches started moving the pocket and let Siemian buy time w/ his legs.

I disagree about Siemian's skill set in not being ideal for NU's O.

When healthy (meaning being able to move scramble/roll out), Siemian really got the O humming even w/ the deficiencies at O-line and receivers.

The renewed passing threat is also what got Jackson and Green their long runs towards the end of the season as opposing DCs would call a play against the pass and NU would counter w/ a delayed draw (Green's longest run of the season).




If Prater had Christian Jones on the other side to attract some attention and a healthy TS who could buy some time w/ his legs, think the 2 would have put up some big nos.




The 3 things they like (and not just from the 1 quarter in pre-season play but from camp) are Siemian's arm strength, touch/accuracy and poise.

As for coaching, who know who gets the credit for that - probably a mix of Siemian's HS coaches, McCall, Jeff Christensen (the Midwest QB Guru) and Baz (think Siemian got in on some of the workouts Baz had during his time tenure w/ the Bears, but Kafka and Persa getting the most work w/ Baz), but McCall didn't always do Siemian favors w/ his playcalling.




Basically speaks ill of the readiness of the QBs behind TS.

But even so, Siemian should not have been in the game against Western where TS was clearly in pain and really limited when it came to planting his leg for throws.

Also, in the 4th Q against UNL when the NU receiving corps had been decimated, there was little point in keeping TS in there - Siemian basically had little time to throw and had to throw precise darts (for not much gain) - a miss by few inches and would have resulted in an INT and probably a pick-6.

And when the coaching staff did finally put in Oliver against Iowa, didn't see the point as they had Oliver sitting back there like a statue - which is what Siemian could have done (but he took enough of a beating as it was).





Not surprisingly, saw the same struggles w/ Hackenberg and the PSU O last season and in both cases, the inexperienced receivers would run incorrect routes or run the routes poorly w/ the flack going to the QB from the less discerning fans (this is why Prater became Siemian's go-to guy - ran the correct routes).




Not going to expand on this since I've talked about it enough already.




But for dropped passes, TS would have had over 300 yds passing in both the Cal and NIU games as well.

And TS was healthy back then - one has to seriously wonder why the coaching staff didn't move the pocket/have TS roll out and put added pressure on the opposing D (while Jackson had some productive runs, had limited carries and Green averaged 2.8 and 2.6 ypc).

Even w/ the problems on the O-line and receiver, Siemian's leg injury really made things that much worse on O.

Still, would have been nice to have had say, Indiana's O-line from last year (despite no passing threat once Sudfeld went down and opposing Ds keying on the run, the IU O-line managed to open big holes for Coleman.

Imagine what Siemian and Jackson could have done behind that O-line (never mind that for UW, Minny, dOSU, MSU, etc.).

And once Jones went down, the WR group became real thin w/ 2 transfers, Prater and Shuler being key members (until they went down w/ injuries themselves).

These 2 positions in particular have had issues w/ recruiting and/or player development of late.

Previously, it had been the DBs and at RB w/ the DT position not getting the depth it needs (but that's been a long standing problem).

Anyhow, both IC (5 tackles) and Lawrence (3 grabs for 25 yds) had pretty good showings as well on Friday.

On a side note, Happ in his 2nd start for the Pirates pitched pretty well, giving up 1 ER in 5.1 innings against the Mets.
 
Gocatsgo +1 I was a fervent backer of Trevor. I don't think many folks understand just how many of those dropped passes effected the outcome of games. Often when things like that happen, then the QB tries to make PERFECT throws so they get caught and not dropped. In these times they may try to guide the ball like a pitcher who is struggling does. The result is that instead of doing things innately (i.e.) gripping it and ripping it they try to be to perfect and then struggle.
Another factor was the line that was poor, but the coaching from McCall even worse. I believe the best example of that was the Michigan game when color commentator Ed Cunningham who was an offensive lineman in the NFL, all but said that McCall was an idiot. His comments that he felt sorry for Trevor and that the line was not meant to block the way it was being asked to. You'll recall that finally after Cunningham harped for three quarters about the line play, in the fourth quarter, McCall began moving Trevor and suddenly the offense started to move the ball and we should have won the game. The next game against ND we did win with more movement and an awesome game from Trevor. Purdue was more of the same until he got hurt.
So in a long winded answer because of injuries, a poor line, receivers who routinely dropped passes and an OC who appeared to be utterly clueless at times last year, Trevor struggled until the ND game when he really turned it up. As a point of fact, even in the ND game TJ dropped two sure TD passes.
Well said bro. Trevor was the least of NU's problems last season
 
Wrasses called Trevor the best pure passer in the BT and a certain pro prospect! Congrats! Not sure if Kyle has the speed for the NFL,possibly,good spirited kid! I hope he makes it.
 
Well said bro. Trevor was the least of NU's problems last season
If Shuler catches that perfect throw from Siemian for the TD in the first half vs. NIU, we probably would have won that game (needed to get ahead of them). Then maybe he doesn't get the ankle injury late in that game. He didn't looked healthy again until Michigan, another game we should have won. He was not the main problem last year and he has a decent chance for a pro career. AND, I will always remember Trevor for leading us to the much-needed Gator Bowl win!
 
If Shuler catches that perfect throw from Siemian for the TD in the first half vs. NIU, we probably would have won that game (needed to get ahead of them). Then maybe he doesn't get the ankle injury late in that game. He didn't looked healthy again until Michigan, another game we should have won. He was not the main problem last year and he has a decent chance for a pro career. AND, I will always remember Trevor for leading us to the much-needed Gator Bowl win!

Agree on all points. The highlight of his career for me was the Syracuse game a couple of years ago. He was on fire. Hope he can stick with Denver.
 
why would anyone be surprised about Siemian's performances in the NFL. The guy is smart as they come, and can make any pass. With any OL to protect him and with no injuries, he was the best NFL caliber QB in the BIG, even ahead of the 3 OSU guys coming out next year. He is a gunslinger and makes some poor decisions but so be it. He will be a NFL fixture for 15 years.

OTOH, Prater could have been good but I don't see him as anything more than a marginal practice squad player.
 
I agree that Trevor was coached well,has a strong arm and is adequately mobile. I also believe that he was not 100% last year and the O-line did not perform very well. What I dont understand is why we kept playing him under those circumstances and either did not put Oliver in...go to the spread with Alviti....or give THorson his baptism? And maybe after a couple of weeks along Trevor could have come back at 100% or maybe we even would have discovered that we could be successful with the spread and even have gotten the other 3 qbs some experience. As it was we got none of those and didnt get to a bowl game. Did we have so little faith in the other 3 at that point that we kept playing an injured,immobile quarterback behind a mediocre O-line as our best option?
Trevor was coached well. You have to be kidding. The guy was aweful after Colter left and will never play in a meaingful NFL game.
 
Trevor was coached well. You have to be kidding. The guy was aweful after Colter left and will never play in a meaingful NFL game.

To be fair, the people who drafted Siemian are John Elway and Gary Kubiak, neither of whom know much about the quarterback position
 
Trevor was coached well. You have to be kidding. The guy was aweful after Colter left and will never play in a meaingful NFL game.
The guy has talent. I think he will be no less than practice squad. But he really has potential over a career. And i wouldnt be surprised if he makes the roster at some point this year. Eventually he will start in the NFL. He simply had no wide outs last year nor any infrastructure to protect him. Amazingly after getting the hell knocked out of him for two years, he was still standing strong and not scared. One tuff kid.
 
To be fair, the people who drafted Siemian are John Elway and Gary Kubiak, neither of whom know much about the quarterback position
I agree with this but in a weird way it makes me really discouraged about the offense. If Trevor was actually good, then the rest of the team sucked. He had the ball on every play but had no one to help him or had a miserable game plan to attack with. So we may have had an NFL level QB and were one of the worst offenses in college football.
His success so far post graduation is great and I wish him the best but I don't like what it says about our program outside of QB development.
 
Gee these guys are from the two most criticized positions on last seasons team. Could it be coaching? I'll duck and wait for your responses.
They also had careers pot marked with injuries. Prater was finally starting to be used last year when he went down again. TS started the season injured, started to recover and went down again.
 
They also had careers pot marked with injuries. Prater was finally starting to be used last year when he went down again. TS started the season injured, started to recover and went down again.
So that make me think that the biggest problem last season was the drop off from QB1 to QB2. If Trevor's injuries slowed him up that much the coaches should have had someone capable of performing as well as an injured Trevor while he recovered. The result may not have been any better but Trevor would have had a week off and number 2 would have gotten some game experience which would benefit us this year.
 
So that make me think that the biggest problem last season was the drop off from QB1 to QB2. If Trevor's injuries slowed him up that much the coaches should have had someone capable of performing as well as an injured Trevor while he recovered. The result may not have been any better but Trevor would have had a week off and number 2 would have gotten some game experience which would benefit us this year.

WR and OL were the much larger issues.
 
"... As for coaching, who know who gets the credit for that - probably a mix of Siemian's HS coaches, McCall, Jeff Christensen (the Midwest QB Guru) and Baz (think Siemian got in on some of the workouts Baz had during his time tenure w/ the Bears, but Kafka and Persa getting the most work w/ Baz), but McCall didn't always do Siemian favors w/ his playcalling ..."

More so than dropped passes, offensive line woes, or mobility/injury issues, play calling served as the prime culprit retarding Trevor's college career. Look at the Michigan 2-point play. The opposition actually disclosed openly that they knew the play in advance. Many of Trevor's pick-sixes - I hate that expression by the way - also transpired from the transparency of those plays.

The highly lethargic, "hurry up," no huddle offense doesn't disadvantage anyone but NU; this effeminate ploy is nothing more than a mockery and cheap imitation of those vanguard and innovative Walker offenses and a slow motion diagram to defenses showcasing the next play call.

And to a degree, even the coaching staff concedes to the unimaginative nature of its the offensive play calling and execution, although they've looked everywhere for excuses except at themselves. Closed practices won't renew the mystique of NU's offense.
 
So that make me think that the biggest problem last season was the drop off from QB1 to QB2. If Trevor's injuries slowed him up that much the coaches should have had someone capable of performing as well as an injured Trevor while he recovered. The result may not have been any better but Trevor would have had a week off and number 2 would have gotten some game experience which would benefit us this year.
Oliver was number 2 and had even less mobility than TS injured. He was not a great fit for our OL. the way they were playing. With the problems TS was having, ZO would not seem to be a good option. With a better OL... I think they wanted the OL to gel before putting in Oliver and unfortunately, it really never did. Alviti was a RS Frosh and it would be a difficult place to put him in. IMO, the dropoff in QBs had as much or more to do with the poor OL play as it did with their development.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT