ADVERTISEMENT

Remain calm

CappyNU

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Mar 3, 2004
4,754
4,616
113
Chicago
Yes, the start to conference play hasn't gone great. But as I mentioned the other week, our schedule to open conference play is absolutely brutal. Is 1-4 good? Of course not. But consider this:

We lost on a prayer against an Iowa team that beat Indiana by 25 and lost at Michigan by just 2 points
We beat an Illini team that beat Oregon on the road by 32 points
We got screwed by the refs against a Penn State team who beat Purdue by 11 at home and lost to Oregon at home by just 1
We got beat by a Purdue team that beat Nebraska by 36 points at home
We got beat by an MSU team that beat Nebraska by 37 points and Washington by 34 points at home

We are not as bad as we seem.

Next up, we get a Maryland team that is 0-3 on the road and only beat Minnesota by 6 tonight at home.

There is plenty of season left.
 
All true. We should win against Maryland, that would be normal.

But also true is that we are now under immense pressure. We mess up the MD game and we are easily talking about 1-6 as winning in Ann Arbor is extremely unlikely. MI is hot and I will be providing the kiss of death by attending the game.
 
I'm with ya on remaining calm. I was expecting 2-3 when we started B1G play, so we were a 30 foot prayer away from that. But, yes, 1-4 reduces the margin for error. kenpom rated the first 5 games of the schedule the toughest Conf SOS.

The next five games are maybe not as tough, but I wouldn't say its a reprieve:
  • Home vs. Turtles. Testudo has been meh on the road, though 2 of those losses are on the vaunted west coast road trip.
  • @ Michigan. Wolverines go to Williams Arena on Thursday, so who knows if the Gophs can take some bite outta them before we get them at Crisler. Maybe they look past us because Purdue looms on the schedule, but let's be real, Dusty May is gonna want revenge. This'll be rough.
  • Home vs. Hoosiers. IU is 4-2, but those wins were against Minny, Rutgers, PSU and USC. Meanwhile they got torched on the road by Nebby and Iowa. If they are true to form, then this should be a Cats win at Welsh-Ryan, as the supertalented Hoosiers continue to be an enigma under Woodson.
  • @Illinois. The return date at State Farm Center. Hoo boy, Illinois will be out for blood as kenpom predicts a 21 point ass-kicking.
  • Rutgers. They just grimy-ed out a game against a reeling UCLA at Jersey Mike's tonight, but they remain offensively challenged. Plus, they ain't great on the road with double digit losses @ Indiana and Ohio State

If Brooks remains a high volume shooter, then the 'Cats can't afford nights where he's putting up 20%+ of the team's shots, but his Offensive Rating is 52 (MSU), 62 (Purdue). He had a 66 against Illinois, but the 'Cats played tremendous defense in only giving up 0.88 PPP. My hope that this is the floor, and he will get more efficient and as a result, the offense will follow. What would help is that if he could get to the FT line - through 5 B1G games he's gotten to the line 15 times, and on pace for 60 over 20 games . Last year he had 82 FTA over 20 games. However, this year he's got career highs in %Poss (28.1) and %Shots (27.7). Per Torvik, he's 33/63 shots "at the rim" through 5 B1G games, and through 20 games last year he was 66/124. So he's attacking the paint - he's just not getting rewarded for it.

Also, NU is 4th best in the league with ball security, only giving it up 16.2% of the time, and that was after facing league best ballhawks PSU (forced 21.3%), 3rd best Purdue (20.0) and 5th best Iowa (19.3) and 8th best MSU (17.7). Maryland are handsy, as they are 2nd best in B1G/20.0, but the remainder of opponents aren't as keen to steal: Indiana is 14th/16.0, Rutgers is 16th/14.1, Illinois is 17th/14.0, and Michigan is last/12.3. So from that perspective, we should be under slightly less duress on offense.

Conversely, NU has forced TOs on their opponents 17.6% of the time (10th) - Michigan gives it up 19.5% (17th) and Rutgers fumbles it away 17.7% (13th), so perhaps there's some easier transition buckets to be had in those games.

So, there are some edges to work in the next five games. If we can scratch out 3-2 and get to 4-6 at the break (and of course stay healthy), then there's a fighting chance for .500.
 
We are going to have to shoot much better from 3 to win many more games. Minnesota stayed close to Maryland tonight by hitting 7 3s in the first half and then they got beat by their Freshman big who went off for 27 points. Like many Big Ten teams, they have several shot blockers to inhibit our inside game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deeringfish
We are going to have to shoot much better from 3 to win many more games. Minnesota stayed close to Maryland tonight by hitting 7 3s in the first half and then they got beat by their Freshman big who went off for 27 points. Like many Big Ten teams, they have several shot blockers to inhibit our inside game.

26.3% from 3FG in B1G play is dead last in the league. I hope that it can't get any worse.

Looking at the team's 3PT performance against Tier A+B teams (kenpom) last year:
PlayerGames3FGM3FGA3FG%
Barnhizer21236933.3
Martinelli2193228.1
Leach21911.1
Berry13357646.1
Hunger1952520
Mullins111250

Aligned with you that 3FG gotta improve - if anything, just to create more space inside for our preferred paint attacking strategy.


Here's how we're looking Tier A+B in '25:

PlayerGames3FGA3FGM3FG%
Barnhizer652321.7
Martinelli782040
Leach772924.1
Berry772924.1
Hunger6050
Mullins71119.1
Ciaravino671643.8
Windham541625

Yeah, the kids are gonna have to help out with 3, or hope that Leach/Berry can find their form. I'm happy that Nick has stepped up his 3FGA and seems to have improved against top 100 competition.
 
26.3% from 3FG in B1G play is dead last in the league. I hope that it can't get any worse.

Looking at the team's 3PT performance against Tier A+B teams (kenpom) last year:
PlayerGames3FGM3FGA3FG%
Barnhizer21236933.3
Martinelli2193228.1
Leach21911.1
Berry13357646.1
Hunger1952520
Mullins111250

Aligned with you that 3FG gotta improve - if anything, just to create more space inside for our preferred paint attacking strategy.


Here's how we're looking Tier A+B in '25:

PlayerGames3FGA3FGM3FG%
Barnhizer652321.7
Martinelli782040
Leach772924.1
Berry772924.1
Hunger6050
Mullins71119.1
Ciaravino671643.8
Windham541625

Yeah, the kids are gonna have to help out with 3, or hope that Leach/Berry can find their form. I'm happy that Nick has stepped up his 3FGA and seems to have improved against top 100 competition.
Gotta remember that Barnhizer was injured for a long while also, He missed the first 4 games and that was after being in a boot for a long time, It might have something to do with his 3 pt dropoff. Berry's struggles have been pretty well documented but Barnhizer has had his issues there as well. He just has so many other parts to his game that it gets missed
 
I'm okay with finding the silver lining.... but the fact is we got slaughtered by both Purdue and Michigan State. Back to back.
They both did the same thing against us defensively and we struggled.

We missed Hunger in the MSU game. I really hope he is able to go against Maryland.
Queen and Reese are both strong rebounders for the Terps - I could see that being an issue.
Nicholson will have to stay out of foul trouble - and Queen is going to get a lot of touches, so that will be a challenge..
Maryland has 5 guys averaging 11+ points, but at least their guards are big and don't appear to be quicker than ours.
That should help immensely.

Could be a physical game. Would be nice to get Queen and Reese in foul trouble, not the other way around.
 
How do you think we missed Hunger? I'm not sure adding his 0 for 4 shooting, 2 rebounds, and 3 fouls into the mix would change much.
 
How do you think we missed Hunger? I'm not sure adding his 0 for 4 shooting, 2 rebounds, and 3 fouls into the mix would change much.

I'm among the few on this board who doesn't crap on Hunger consistently. That's because at his size, agility and fearlessness (in terms of taking shots and being physical), he can make a meaningful contribution as a backup.

Last year:
  • vs. Michigan State - 10 on 6 shots (2/3 from 3FG), 4 reb, 1 ast, 1 blk, 1 stl in 19 min
  • vs OSU - 11 on 6 (1/3 from 3FG), 3 reb, 1 ast in 23 min
  • vs Michigan - 8 on 5, 2 reb in 18 min
then after Nicholson went down:
  • vs. Wisconsin at BTT - 6 on 3, 4 reb, 2 ast in 32 min
  • vs. FAU (NCAA rd 1) - 8 on 6 (6/8 from FT), 8 reb, 4 ast in 29 min
This year his best B1G performance was vs Iowa: 7 on 5, 4 reb, 1. ast, in 22 min. Nicholson is the better defender, for sure - and I'd advocate Nix getting 22-25 minutes a game - but Hunger can add another wrinkle - he's definitely got a smooth mid-range jumper, and he can upfake and drive against less mobile 5s. It's been tough to get that consistently out of him this year so far, but I think it's there.
 
I think Luke is a great, high character guy who plays hard, does his best, and shows a positive outlook in game.
I appreciate that we have him as a backup on the team.
I am interested in giving a few of his minutes to Keenan going forward, see how that goes.

Per ESPN this is his 2024-2025 line thru 15 games:

GPMINFG%3P%FT%REBASTBLKSTLPFTOPTS
1515.938.16.783.33.11.70.10.12.10.73.6

Matt is the better defender, but Luke's offense isn't showing up so much - and that's with mostly non-conference foes. Luke is the best free throw shooter of the three of them by far, no contest, but he doesn't draw fouls - six free throws so far this season.

Matt, who is generally treated as an offensive black hole:

GPMINFG%3P%FT%REBASTBLKSTLPFTOPTS
1622.760.80.047.64.91.31.20.61.80.65.1
 
  • Like
Reactions: NUCat320
How do you think we missed Hunger? I'm not sure adding his 0 for 4 shooting, 2 rebounds, and 3 fouls into the mix would change much.

because Fitzmorris played 18 minutes or whatever.

There are those on the board who say "Trust Collins, he's infallible"
Fitzmorris is/was 3rd string. Therefore he is much worse than Hunger.
No way around that logic - its like a cult around here sometimes.
Until it is proven wrong and then the story is re-written.

I'm being facetious, but Fitzmorris doesn't look, move or act like a good Big Ten center.
However, I'm all about the results... and so far Fitzmorris, for a guy who previously got zero game experience with his new teammates, has to be a pleasant surprise. Not that he's good - but he doesn't suck like most assumed, based on where he sat on the bench.
 
We did not miss Hunger that badly. Fitzmorris didn’t bring anything to the table I haven’t seen from Hunger. Read into that how you will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EagerFan
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT