I'm going to use an oldie but a goodie here; Carmody sucks.
Ohhhhhhhhhh! We got a Carmody mention here! Aren't you one of the geniuses who accuses others of bringing him into conversations?!?!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm going to use an oldie but a goodie here; Carmody sucks.
Carmody still sucks.Ohhhhhhhhhh! We got a Carmody mention here! Aren't you one of the geniuses who accuses others of bringing him into conversations?!?!
What’s funny is that the roster next year will have more top 100 players than ever before.Carmody still sucks.
Carmody sucks.NU has never had two top 100 players on the same roster before? Hmmmmm...
Is this going to be one of those "new math" counts where Barrett Benson was a "top 100 recruit?" Or is it the recruits currently rated 180 and 300 nationally by the one major service and only three-star players by the other?
This is the kind of manufactured reality (and history) I reference.
Maybe I’m dumb, but which rosters from the past are you thinking had multiple players rated top 100 in the nation?NU has never had two top 100 players on the same roster before? Hmmmmm...
Is this going to be one of those "new math" counts where Barrett Benson was a "top 100 recruit?" Or is it the recruits currently rated 180 and 300 nationally by the one major service and only three-star players by the other?
This is the kind of manufactured reality (and history) I reference.
Can you provide links on those?Right off the top of my head: Joe Harmsen and Evan Eschmeyer in the mid to late 90s. Harmsen was top 50 in some rankings at the time and when Eschmeyer was a senior, Bob Gibbons had him as a top 50 player. Gibbons was THE recruiting guru at the for many years.
Another example: Jitim Young and Ben Johnson.
Another example: JerShon Cobb and Drew Crawford.
The issue here is people like you bloviating and throwing out declarations when you have no idea what you're talking about.
Maybe I’m dumb, but which rosters from the past are you thinking had multiple players rated top 100 in the nation?
Benson was 118 on rivals and 151 on 247, so don’t think anyone is making that case.
Can you provide links on those?
Drew Crawford doesn’t register as a nationally ranked player on Rivals. Cobb came in at 103.
Honestly don’t know about the others but is your argument that we had more talent back then? Next year we will have 4 top 100 on the roster....is that not more than ever before?
I have absolutely 0 clue what you mean by “new math”. Happy to use Rivals rankings straight up.There are not four on the roster next year. You only produce that, as I said, by doing the "new math," where no. 180 is actually no. 80 and so forth. The usual games I've observed here.
I'm willing to admit if Crawford was not a consensus top 100 player, but I certainly recall him appearing in at least one top 100 list.
NU team I recall with the most talent? Probably when they had Shurna, Coble, Thompson, et al. NU rarely has guys who can create offense off the dribble, but they actually had some guys then who could do that. No, this year's team does not have that talent and next year's will be worse because the job did not get done recruiting. More guys with less than spectacular recruiting lists and rankings in that 150-300 range. That's a big letdown after getting some really good prospects in Nance and Kopp (and Lathon at one point). This type of class won't get it done. You can't label every recruit in that range a "sleeper" and a player all the big boys missed. It doesn't work like that. Inexcusable not to be seriously upgrading athleticism with all of Chicago right outside the front door. Many programs would kill for that sort of local recruiting environment.
I have absolutely 0 clue what you mean by “new math”. Happy to use Rivals rankings straight up.
Robbie Beran: 97
Miller Kopp: 66
Pete Nance: 67
Aaron Falzon: 92
There are not four on the roster next year. You only produce that, as I said, by doing the "new math," where no. 180 is actually no. 80 and so forth. The usual games I've observed here.
I'm willing to admit if Crawford was not a consensus top 100 player, but I certainly recall him appearing in at least one top 100 list.
NU team I recall with the most talent? Probably when they had Shurna, Coble, Thompson, et al. NU rarely has guys who can create offense off the dribble, but they actually had some guys then who could do that. No, this year's team does not have that talent and next year's will be worse because the job did not get done recruiting. More guys with less than spectacular recruiting lists and rankings in that 150-300 range. That's a big letdown after getting some really good prospects in Nance and Kopp (and Lathon at one point). This type of class won't get it done. You can't label every recruit in that range a "sleeper" and a player all the big boys missed. It doesn't work like that. Inexcusable not to be seriously upgrading athleticism with all of Chicago right outside the front door. Many programs would kill for that sort of local recruiting environment.
Falzon was also 75 on ESPN.I'll give you Beran, but finding one service that placed Falzon in the top 100, while the rest had him outside it shouldn't qualify.
I also have no idea where he is getting that Drew was a top 100 player. He was a 3* and ESPN didn’t have him nationally ranked and 247 had him at 221, while Rivals didn’t have him ranked in their 250 either....Falzon was also 75 on ESPN.
There are not four on the roster next year. You only produce that, as I said, by doing the "new math," where no. 180 is actually no. 80 and so forth. The usual games I've observed here.
I'm willing to admit if Crawford was not a consensus top 100 player, but I certainly recall him appearing in at least one top 100 list.
NU team I recall with the most talent? Probably when they had Shurna, Coble, Thompson, et al. NU rarely has guys who can create offense off the dribble, but they actually had some guys then who could do that. No, this year's team does not have that talent and next year's will be worse because the job did not get done recruiting. More guys with less than spectacular recruiting lists and rankings in that 150-300 range. That's a big letdown after getting some really good prospects in Nance and Kopp (and Lathon at one point). This type of class won't get it done. You can't label every recruit in that range a "sleeper" and a player all the big boys missed. It doesn't work like that. Inexcusable not to be seriously upgrading athleticism with all of Chicago right outside the front door. Many programs would kill for that sort of local recruiting environment.