I understood "Tap 2.0" to mean three point threat....and that's about it.
Which is why I noted that it wasn't exactly a good analogy as Falzon's production shooting beyond the arc wasn't close to that of Tap.
Falzon started over Tap because he could do more on the floor....the team could play man with Falzon on the floor....it had to play zone with Tap on the floor
Well, wouldn't exactly say that the man-D was operating at peak efficiency w/ Falzon.
Also, Tap was hampered by foot ailments much of his career.
There were fewer games Falzon was able to play this year than games he could not. His injuries are chronic and more significant than most of the players you described. The debilitating nature of his injuries are similar to those of Jershon Cobb....a player prior to Cobb's last year who Collins suggested was a pro prospect. Falzon's NU bball career was wrecked by injury.
Well, Falzon was supposedly healthy (as much as he was going to be) for a period of time but saw limited minutes as the 2 frosh were ahead of him on the depth chart (which is why CC tried to keep Falzon's spirits up by telling him to keep ready and that he'll get his chance).
That chance came in IU on 1/22 (when Nance wasn't available due to mono), where Falzon went off for 21 points.
Falzon's next most productive game was his last one on 3/13 - scoring 11 pts against UI.
OK, let's say that Falzon wasn't as productive btwn those 2 games due to his chronic injuries, but still, he should have a few games of greater production than he did have.
Cobb's issues flared about again his last season and while he saw limited time, he still managed to shoot 40.4% from the field and 36.4% from 3 pt range and Cobb wasn't exactly a 3 pt specialist.