ADVERTISEMENT

The NCAA field.

PurpleWhiteBoy

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2021
5,204
5,878
113
SOUTHSOUTHEASTEASTMIDWESTMIDWESTWESTWEST
SeedTeamPWB SeedTeamPWB SeedTeamPWB SeedTeamPWB Seed
1Auburn1 (3)Duke*1 (2)Houston*1 (4)Florida*1 (1)
2Michigan St2 (7)Alabama2 (5)Tennessee2 (6)St. John's*2 (8)
3Iowa State3 (12)Wisconsin3 (12)Kentucky4 (15)Texas Tech3 (9)
4Texas A&M5 (17)Arizona4 (16)Purdue6 (22)Maryland3 (10)
5Michigan*6 (21)Oregon8 (30)Clemson5 (19)Memphis11 (43)
6Mississippi6 (24)BYU5 (20)Illinois6 (23)Missouri4 (14)
7Marquette8 (31)St. Mary's7 (26)UCLA7 (27)Kansas7 (28)
8Louisville5 (18)Miss St.7 (25)Gonzaga*4 (13)UConn9 (34)
9Creighton10 (38)Baylor8 (32)Georgia8 (29)Oklahoma9 (33)
10New Mexico9 (36)VanderbiltPI (46)Utah St.out (52)Arkansas10 (40)
11N. Carolina10 (39)VCU*10 (37)Xavier11 (42)Drake*12 (54)
12UC San Diego*9 (35)Liberty*12 (59)McNeese*13 (67)Colorado St.*11 (41)

*denotes automatic qualifier

I had Ohio State as the #44 team - and deserving of an invite if all that matters is computer ratings.
The NCAA made it pretty clear that logic was not going to be a deciding factor - that KenPom would be trusted instead of logic.
I think my numbers are better than KenPom's and I would never rely strictly on my numbers when selecting the field.
The biases in Ken Pom, Bart Torvik (or any similar system, including mine) are well known and they favor mediocre teams from conferences that run up the score in the non-conference.
That is the definition of the SEC's approach.
But I would never take a team that was 6-12 in its conference. Never. Its probably time to go back to 64 teams, like rational human beings.
But any rational person also knows that a team with a 6-12 record in conference play is not a good team and has no claim whatsoever to the national championship.

For what its worth, I had North Carolina in the field at #39.
Ohio State followed by Texas (#45), Vanderbilt and San Diego State should have been the play-in teams (If you have to have play-in games).
Utah State at #52 was the only team outside of my rankings to receive a bid - at Ohio State's expense.

But, thats only if you are foolish enough to believe that wins and losses don't count.
Lets toss Oklahoma and Texas for being 6-12. In no universe should they be in the tournament field.
Why do we need play in games again? Okay, sure let the extra 16 seeds play in. But nobody else.
There. Problem solved.

It is pretty shocking that Gonzaga was given an 8 seed when they probably deserved a 4. That only happens to the lesser conferences. It is essentially fraud.
Obviously, Gonzaga took offense (justifiably so) and annihilated Georgia.
Oregon, on the other hand, deserved an 8 and got a 5 seed. Hard to figure that one out - unless there were bribes involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loyolacat
There are plenty of teams in this tournament on the 12 line and below we would've been an upgrade to replace.
 
SOUTHSOUTHEASTEASTMIDWESTMIDWESTWESTWEST
SeedTeamPWB SeedTeamPWB SeedTeamPWB SeedTeamPWB Seed
1Auburn1 (3)Duke*1 (2)Houston*1 (4)Florida*1 (1)
2Michigan St2 (7)Alabama2 (5)Tennessee2 (6)St. John's*2 (8)
3Iowa State3 (12)Wisconsin3 (12)Kentucky4 (15)Texas Tech3 (9)
4Texas A&M5 (17)Arizona4 (16)Purdue6 (22)Maryland3 (10)
5Michigan*6 (21)Oregon8 (30)Clemson5 (19)Memphis11 (43)
6Mississippi6 (24)BYU5 (20)Illinois6 (23)Missouri4 (14)
7Marquette8 (31)St. Mary's7 (26)UCLA7 (27)Kansas7 (28)
8Louisville5 (18)Miss St.7 (25)Gonzaga*4 (13)UConn9 (34)
9Creighton10 (38)Baylor8 (32)Georgia8 (29)Oklahoma9 (33)
10New Mexico9 (36)VanderbiltPI (46)Utah St.out (52)Arkansas10 (40)
11N. Carolina10 (39)VCU*10 (37)Xavier11 (42)Drake*12 (54)
12UC San Diego*9 (35)Liberty*12 (59)McNeese*13 (67)Colorado St.*11 (41)

*denotes automatic qualifier

I had Ohio State as the #44 team - and deserving of an invite if all that matters is computer ratings.
The NCAA made it pretty clear that logic was not going to be a deciding factor - that KenPom would be trusted instead of logic.
I think my numbers are better than KenPom's and I would never rely strictly on my numbers when selecting the field.
The biases in Ken Pom, Bart Torvik (or any similar system, including mine) are well known and they favor mediocre teams from conferences that run up the score in the non-conference.
That is the definition of the SEC's approach.
But I would never take a team that was 6-12 in its conference. Never. Its probably time to go back to 64 teams, like rational human beings.
But any rational person also knows that a team with a 6-12 record in conference play is not a good team and has no claim whatsoever to the national championship.

For what its worth, I had North Carolina in the field at #39.
Ohio State followed by Texas (#45), Vanderbilt and San Diego State should have been the play-in teams (If you have to have play-in games).
Utah State at #52 was the only team outside of my rankings to receive a bid - at Ohio State's expense.

But, thats only if you are foolish enough to believe that wins and losses don't count.
Lets toss Oklahoma and Texas for being 6-12. In no universe should they be in the tournament field.
Why do we need play in games again? Okay, sure let the extra 16 seeds play in. But nobody else.
There. Problem solved.

It is pretty shocking that Gonzaga was given an 8 seed when they probably deserved a 4. That only happens to the lesser conferences. It is essentially fraud.
Obviously, Gonzaga took offense (justifiably so) and annihilated Georgia.
Oregon, on the other hand, deserved an 8 and got a 5 seed. Hard to figure that one out - unless there were bribes involved.
SEC is showing that they were over rated and no way should they have had 14 of 16 teams in the tourney. I think BIG is 8-0 for the first round, Big deserved at least one more if not two and SEC should have had 1-2 less
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT