Here's a look at what NU lineups have been able to accomplish this season when Ty Berry was not on the court...
I am using 17 games... all the Big Ten games plus Dayton, Mississippi State, DePaul and Arizona State.
This includes the entire book on how Clayton has been used...
Most importantly, the starting lineup is -11 for the season. Thats a reminder of the old, painful Nance/Beran days. Okay probably not that grim, but not good.
We have been better with Hunger at the 5 with the current (non-Berry) starters.
The sample sizes for Clayton are almost all very small. Not a lot of game time was given to developing Plan B (what if one of my 5 non-centers gets hurt?).
What we see is that Clayton has been able to sub in for Martinelli and Langborg without giving up too much ground.
The minutes he has played for Barnhizer have been productive.
The minutes Clayton has played for Buie, we have not been able to score.
With so little data on Clayton, its a bit of a crapshoot.
Meanwhile, Luke Hunger stands ready, willing and able to sub in for anybody who weighs 20 lbs less than he does.
I am using 17 games... all the Big Ten games plus Dayton, Mississippi State, DePaul and Arizona State.
This includes the entire book on how Clayton has been used...
Center | PF | SF | SG | PG | Minutes | NU Pts | Opp Pts | NU Pace | Opp Pace |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nicholson | Martinelli | Barnhizer | Langborg | Buie | 91 | 141 | 152 | 62.1 | 66.9 |
Hunger | Martinelli | Barnhizer | Langborg | Buie | 35 | 69 | 53 | 79.4 | 61.1 |
Preston | Martinelli | Barnhizer | Langborg | Buie | 23 | 45 | 42 | 77.0 | 71.9 |
Nicholson | Martinelli | Barnhizer | Clayton | Buie | 10 | 22 | 24 | 84.9 | 92.6 |
Hunger | Martinelli | Barnhizer | Clayton | Buie | 4 | 2 | 4 | --- | --- |
Preston | Martinelli | Barnhizer | Clayton | Buie | 1 | 2 | 3 | --- | --- |
Nicholson | Barnhizer | Langborg | Clayton | Buie | 4 | 7 | 7 | --- | --- |
Hunger | Barnhizer | Langborg | Clayton | Buie | 8 | 14 | 14 | 68.3 | 68.3 |
Preston | Barnhizer | Langborg | Clayton | Buie | 3 | 5 | 3 | --- | --- |
Nicholson | Martinelli | Langborg | Clayton | Buie | 1 | 0 | 0 | --- | --- |
Hunger | Martinelli | Langborg | Clayton | Buie | 4 | 9 | 4 | --- | --- |
Preston | Martinelli | Langborg | Clayton | Buie | 9 | 14 | 11 | 65.4 | 51.4 |
any of the 3 | Martinelli | Barnhizer | Langborg | Clayton | 10 | 6 | 16 | 25.3 | 67.5 |
Most importantly, the starting lineup is -11 for the season. Thats a reminder of the old, painful Nance/Beran days. Okay probably not that grim, but not good.
We have been better with Hunger at the 5 with the current (non-Berry) starters.
The sample sizes for Clayton are almost all very small. Not a lot of game time was given to developing Plan B (what if one of my 5 non-centers gets hurt?).
What we see is that Clayton has been able to sub in for Martinelli and Langborg without giving up too much ground.
The minutes he has played for Barnhizer have been productive.
The minutes Clayton has played for Buie, we have not been able to score.
With so little data on Clayton, its a bit of a crapshoot.
Meanwhile, Luke Hunger stands ready, willing and able to sub in for anybody who weighs 20 lbs less than he does.